Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V22

views
     
azriel
post Nov 16 2016, 01:39 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
Otokar - Altay Main Battle Tanks Field & Snow Testing.


pcboss00
post Nov 16 2016, 02:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 16 2016, 12:32 PM)
IMHO Hydrographic surveying is an auxiliary duty at best anyway, so we don't actually need dedicated naval vessels for it if we don't have the money. Contracting a civilian survey firm for this duty is totally acceptable.
*
True. 120 crew per ship really surprised me. Compare to other class ship, almost as much as our frigate.
atreyuangel
post Nov 16 2016, 02:43 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(pcboss00 @ Nov 16 2016, 02:09 PM)
True. 120 crew per ship really surprised me. Compare to other class ship, almost as much as our frigate.
*
kedah30 org je nk operate
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 16 2016, 03:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Nov 16 2016, 02:43 PM)
kedah30 org je nk operate
*
Minimal number of crew? Wiki says current full complement is 78 (as an OPV), if full missile weapons systems the number of crew will be 98.

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Nov 16 2016, 03:17 PM
atreyuangel
post Nov 16 2016, 03:20 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 16 2016, 03:09 PM)
Minimal number of crew? Wiki says current full complement is 78 (as an OPV), if full missile weapons systems the number of crew will be 98.
*
correct min number of crew needed to fully operate the Kedah is 30 personnel.
the tacticos system is very modern and complicated and yet very modular
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 16 2016, 03:38 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Nov 16 2016, 03:20 PM)
correct min number of crew needed to fully operate the Kedah is 30 personnel.
the tacticos system is very modern and complicated and yet very modular
*
Seriously, what is the problem with the Kedah-class not equipped with missiles? At least the Exocets if not the SeaRAM?

IIRC the RMN has a good number of Exocets. In the grand scope of things, is it so costly to install a few on the Kedah-class? A ship only needs 8 missiles anyway (assuming the on-board FCS can already support them). confused.gif
azriel
post Nov 16 2016, 04:15 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
Indonesian President Jokowi visits the Indonesian Army Kostrad 1st Infantry Division Headquarter with the Leopard 2RI & Leopard 2A4 MBTs on the background. Credit to Penkostrad.

user posted image
duHwaN
post Nov 16 2016, 04:26 PM

Nope
******
Senior Member
1,644 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Penang
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 16 2016, 03:38 PM)
Seriously, what is the problem with the Kedah-class not equipped with missiles? At least the Exocets if not the SeaRAM?

IIRC the RMN has a good number of Exocets. In the grand scope of things, is it so costly to install a few on the Kedah-class? A ship only needs 8 missiles anyway (assuming the on-board FCS can already support them). confused.gif
*
Put in the launchers, it would technically be a corvette d. Nice catalyst to start a regional arms race. Anyway, hardpoints are already there... so

This post has been edited by duHwaN: Nov 16 2016, 04:27 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 16 2016, 04:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(duHwaN @ Nov 16 2016, 04:26 PM)
Put in the launchers, it would technically be a corvette d. Nice catalyst to start a regional arms race. Anyway, hardpoints are already there... so
*
What arms race? The RMN is as bare bones as it is.

TNI arming up like crazy and I have yet to see any kind of arms race.
Oneil88
post Nov 16 2016, 04:42 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Feb 2016
M113 TNI Swim in Natuna

keown83
post Nov 16 2016, 04:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: penang wit love

QUOTE(duHwaN @ Nov 16 2016, 04:26 PM)
Put in the launchers, it would technically be a corvette d. Nice catalyst to start a regional arms race. Anyway, hardpoints are already there... so
*
i did took this bait befur..but looking at how Indonesia & Singapore progress on their navy modernization program, i could not take this kind of 'prevent arm race' bullshit anymore
atreyuangel
post Nov 16 2016, 05:07 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 16 2016, 03:38 PM)
Seriously, what is the problem with the Kedah-class not equipped with missiles? At least the Exocets if not the SeaRAM?

IIRC the RMN has a good number of Exocets. In the grand scope of things, is it so costly to install a few on the Kedah-class? A ship only needs 8 missiles anyway (assuming the on-board FCS can already support them). confused.gif
*
because right now it will only served as Patrol Vessel role only
SUSKLboy92
post Nov 16 2016, 05:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 16 2016, 03:38 PM)
Seriously, what is the problem with the Kedah-class not equipped with missiles? At least the Exocets if not the SeaRAM?

IIRC the RMN has a good number of Exocets. In the grand scope of things, is it so costly to install a few on the Kedah-class? A ship only needs 8 missiles anyway (assuming the on-board FCS can already support them). :confused:
*
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Nov 16 2016, 05:07 PM)
because right now it will only served as Patrol Vessel role only
*
As ever, I believe its budget issue as well as operational requirements
6 Kedahs x 8 missiles x about EUR 1m each = Rm224 million

Thats not chump change. Even if we arm just 2 Kedahs at a time, thats Rm75M... its the choice between up gunning the Kedahs with token* antiship weapons or buying another 1.5 LMS platforms... choose.

*with the vast array of SAMs and CIWS in existence the best antship weapon is a sublaunched torpedo. Thats the Western doctrine anyway.

P.s. RAM missile is the same price and come in 21 round launcher... you figure that price out I already rclxub.gif

QUOTE(waja2000 @ Nov 16 2016, 11:50 AM)
agree, it will cost more, and not happen soon, at lease ofter SGPV is built. i think LMS can past to 2nd tier ship yard to built.
also BM5/BM6/Tun Azizan after Lahad Datu standoff,it  add role as mobile sea base, but it not really good solution.

Muhibbah Enginerring propose mobile offshore base see on DSA 2016 much better solution。future Mindef can consider it. put 2 in semporna 1 in Sandakan offshore。

user posted image

user posted image
*
Damn it looks big!

The ships are old. If it saves money to decom then, we should. Similar to UK Armed Forces, suck up a capability gap for 5-10 years then come back into the game with a bigger wallet

This post has been edited by KLboy92: Nov 16 2016, 05:33 PM
duHwaN
post Nov 16 2016, 05:46 PM

Nope
******
Senior Member
1,644 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Penang
QUOTE(keown83 @ Nov 16 2016, 04:58 PM)
i did took this bait befur..but looking at how Indonesia & Singapore progress on their navy modernization program, i could not take this kind of 'prevent arm race' bullshit anymore
*
Exactly the race we are talking about.

At the moment, there is no immediate scenario for confrontation in the region, so arming the ships will just incur a higher running cost (possibly reducing available budget in the future) without a immediate need. If there is a need, it would not take long anyway to do the fittings.

Different story if you think having those ships is a mistake in the first place.
Fat & Fluffy
post Nov 16 2016, 05:53 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Jan 2016
From: Hong Kong



QUOTE(waja2000 @ Nov 16 2016, 02:08 PM)
BTW yesterday some good news: laugh.gif
RMN Receives MV Aishah Aims 4 For Hydrographic Survey

PELABUHAN KLANG, Nov 15 (Bernama) -- The Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) today received the MV Aishah Aims 4 vessel which is capable of carrying out a broad and comprehensive hydrographic data survey of the country's territorial waters.

RMN chief Admiral Datuk Seri Ahmad Kamarulzaman Ahmad Badaruddin said the vessel was obtained through a lease contract to replace the RMN's two existing hydrographic survey vessels, 'KD Mutiara' and 'KD Perantau', which would be phased out in stages.

"For instance, the function of the 40-year-old KD Mutiara cannot be optimised fully as it requires high operational and maintenance costs. The annual expenditure to operate KD Mutiara and KD Perantau costs between RM25 million and RM30 million.....

user posted image
*
as expected... entah siapa earlier tok kok
ayanami_tard
post Nov 16 2016, 06:38 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Nov 16 2016, 06:30 PM)
As ever, I believe its budget issue as well as operational requirements
6 Kedahs x 8 missiles x about EUR 1m each = Rm224 million

Thats not chump change. Even if we arm just 2 Kedahs at a time, thats Rm75M... its the choice between up gunning the Kedahs with token* antiship weapons or buying another 1.5 LMS platforms... choose.

*with the vast array of SAMs and CIWS in existence the best antship weapon is a sublaunched torpedo. Thats the Western doctrine anyway.

P.s. RAM missile is the same price and come in 21 round launcher... you figure that price out I already rclxub.gif
Damn it looks big!

The ships are old. If it saves money to decom then, we should. Similar to UK Armed Forces, suck up a capability gap for 5-10 years then come back into the game with a bigger wallet
*
We have plenty of exocet stockpile laying about and MBDA offers upgrade for MM38 to MM40 block 2

SUSKLboy92
post Nov 16 2016, 07:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Nov 16 2016, 06:38 PM)
We have plenty of exocet stockpile laying about and MBDA offers upgrade for MM38 to MM40 block 2
*
I dunno, if atreyu can explain why we do not use them if they are "lying around"...?

Wild-ass guess here: perhaps they have an operational lifespan, if we take them out of store and install that means they start to depreciate already, in a few years will need to buy replacement? hmm.gif
MilitaryMadness
post Nov 16 2016, 07:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Nov 16 2016, 06:38 PM)
We have plenty of exocet stockpile laying about and MBDA offers upgrade for MM38 to MM40 block 2
*
I'm reaching out on a limb here, but is it possible to take out the Exocet launch units from the old missile boats that we're about to retire on arrival of the LMS and install them on the Kedah-class OPVs? IIRC Exocet systems are pretty modular anyway. If the FCS is already installed and all it takes is for to activate it is the installation of launch units why not go for it? laugh.gif

It still doesn't solve the Kedah-class' current lack of anti-air capabilities, but hey, at least it's better than nothing.
yinchet
post Nov 16 2016, 07:57 PM

If you wish for peace, prepare for war
Group Icon
Elite
1,157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Petaling Jaya

QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Nov 16 2016, 05:30 PM)
As ever, I believe its budget issue as well as operational requirements
6 Kedahs x 8 missiles x about EUR 1m each = Rm224 million

Thats not chump change. Even if we arm just 2 Kedahs at a time, thats Rm75M... its the choice between up gunning the Kedahs with token* antiship weapons or buying another 1.5 LMS platforms... choose.

*with the vast array of SAMs and CIWS in existence the best antship weapon is a sublaunched torpedo. Thats the Western doctrine anyway.

P.s. RAM missile is the same price and come in 21 round launcher... you figure that price out I already rclxub.gif
Damn it looks big!

The ships are old. If it saves money to decom then, we should. Similar to UK Armed Forces, suck up a capability gap for 5-10 years then come back into the game with a bigger wallet
*
Lms have higher priority as they are to replace the old laksamana class.
As for arming kedah class that will have to wait for opportunity during midlife upgrade.


ayanami_tard
post Nov 16 2016, 08:06 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Nov 16 2016, 08:31 PM)
I dunno, if atreyu can explain why we do not use them if they are "lying around"...?

Wild-ass guess here: perhaps they have an operational lifespan, if we take them out of store and install that means they start to depreciate already, in a few years will need to buy replacement? hmm.gif
*
These missiles are self contained

118 Pages « < 115 116 117 118 >
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0295sec    0.79    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 09:13 AM