Military Thread V22
Military Thread V22
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 01:39 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
Otokar - Altay Main Battle Tanks Field & Snow Testing.
|
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 02:09 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 16 2016, 12:32 PM) IMHO Hydrographic surveying is an auxiliary duty at best anyway, so we don't actually need dedicated naval vessels for it if we don't have the money. Contracting a civilian survey firm for this duty is totally acceptable. True. 120 crew per ship really surprised me. Compare to other class ship, almost as much as our frigate. |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 02:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
|
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 03:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
|
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 03:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 16 2016, 03:09 PM) Minimal number of crew? Wiki says current full complement is 78 (as an OPV), if full missile weapons systems the number of crew will be 98. correct min number of crew needed to fully operate the Kedah is 30 personnel.the tacticos system is very modern and complicated and yet very modular |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 03:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Nov 16 2016, 03:20 PM) correct min number of crew needed to fully operate the Kedah is 30 personnel. Seriously, what is the problem with the Kedah-class not equipped with missiles? At least the Exocets if not the SeaRAM?the tacticos system is very modern and complicated and yet very modular IIRC the RMN has a good number of Exocets. In the grand scope of things, is it so costly to install a few on the Kedah-class? A ship only needs 8 missiles anyway (assuming the on-board FCS can already support them). |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 04:15 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
Indonesian President Jokowi visits the Indonesian Army Kostrad 1st Infantry Division Headquarter with the Leopard 2RI & Leopard 2A4 MBTs on the background. Credit to Penkostrad.
![]() |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 04:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,644 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Penang |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 16 2016, 03:38 PM) Seriously, what is the problem with the Kedah-class not equipped with missiles? At least the Exocets if not the SeaRAM? Put in the launchers, it would technically be a corvette d. Nice catalyst to start a regional arms race. Anyway, hardpoints are already there... soIIRC the RMN has a good number of Exocets. In the grand scope of things, is it so costly to install a few on the Kedah-class? A ship only needs 8 missiles anyway (assuming the on-board FCS can already support them). This post has been edited by duHwaN: Nov 16 2016, 04:27 PM |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 04:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
QUOTE(duHwaN @ Nov 16 2016, 04:26 PM) Put in the launchers, it would technically be a corvette d. Nice catalyst to start a regional arms race. Anyway, hardpoints are already there... so What arms race? The RMN is as bare bones as it is.TNI arming up like crazy and I have yet to see any kind of arms race. |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 04:42 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Feb 2016 |
M113 TNI Swim in Natuna
|
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 04:58 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
172 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: penang wit love |
QUOTE(duHwaN @ Nov 16 2016, 04:26 PM) Put in the launchers, it would technically be a corvette d. Nice catalyst to start a regional arms race. Anyway, hardpoints are already there... so i did took this bait befur..but looking at how Indonesia & Singapore progress on their navy modernization program, i could not take this kind of 'prevent arm race' bullshit anymore |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 05:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 16 2016, 03:38 PM) Seriously, what is the problem with the Kedah-class not equipped with missiles? At least the Exocets if not the SeaRAM? because right now it will only served as Patrol Vessel role onlyIIRC the RMN has a good number of Exocets. In the grand scope of things, is it so costly to install a few on the Kedah-class? A ship only needs 8 missiles anyway (assuming the on-board FCS can already support them). |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 05:30 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
189 posts Joined: Aug 2015 From: Cherasboy |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 16 2016, 03:38 PM) Seriously, what is the problem with the Kedah-class not equipped with missiles? At least the Exocets if not the SeaRAM? IIRC the RMN has a good number of Exocets. In the grand scope of things, is it so costly to install a few on the Kedah-class? A ship only needs 8 missiles anyway (assuming the on-board FCS can already support them). :confused: QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Nov 16 2016, 05:07 PM) As ever, I believe its budget issue as well as operational requirements6 Kedahs x 8 missiles x about EUR 1m each = Rm224 million Thats not chump change. Even if we arm just 2 Kedahs at a time, thats Rm75M... its the choice between up gunning the Kedahs with token* antiship weapons or buying another 1.5 LMS platforms... choose. *with the vast array of SAMs and CIWS in existence the best antship weapon is a sublaunched torpedo. Thats the Western doctrine anyway. P.s. RAM missile is the same price and come in 21 round launcher... you figure that price out I already QUOTE(waja2000 @ Nov 16 2016, 11:50 AM) agree, it will cost more, and not happen soon, at lease ofter SGPV is built. i think LMS can past to 2nd tier ship yard to built. Damn it looks big!also BM5/BM6/Tun Azizan after Lahad Datu standoff,it add role as mobile sea base, but it not really good solution. Muhibbah Enginerring propose mobile offshore base see on DSA 2016 much better solution。future Mindef can consider it. put 2 in semporna 1 in Sandakan offshore。 ![]() ![]() The ships are old. If it saves money to decom then, we should. Similar to UK Armed Forces, suck up a capability gap for 5-10 years then come back into the game with a bigger wallet This post has been edited by KLboy92: Nov 16 2016, 05:33 PM |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 05:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,644 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Penang |
QUOTE(keown83 @ Nov 16 2016, 04:58 PM) i did took this bait befur..but looking at how Indonesia & Singapore progress on their navy modernization program, i could not take this kind of 'prevent arm race' bullshit anymore Exactly the race we are talking about.At the moment, there is no immediate scenario for confrontation in the region, so arming the ships will just incur a higher running cost (possibly reducing available budget in the future) without a immediate need. If there is a need, it would not take long anyway to do the fittings. Different story if you think having those ships is a mistake in the first place. |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 05:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
397 posts Joined: Jan 2016 From: Hong Kong |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Nov 16 2016, 02:08 PM) BTW yesterday some good news: as expected... entah siapa earlier tok kokRMN Receives MV Aishah Aims 4 For Hydrographic Survey PELABUHAN KLANG, Nov 15 (Bernama) -- The Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) today received the MV Aishah Aims 4 vessel which is capable of carrying out a broad and comprehensive hydrographic data survey of the country's territorial waters. RMN chief Admiral Datuk Seri Ahmad Kamarulzaman Ahmad Badaruddin said the vessel was obtained through a lease contract to replace the RMN's two existing hydrographic survey vessels, 'KD Mutiara' and 'KD Perantau', which would be phased out in stages. "For instance, the function of the 40-year-old KD Mutiara cannot be optimised fully as it requires high operational and maintenance costs. The annual expenditure to operate KD Mutiara and KD Perantau costs between RM25 million and RM30 million..... ![]() |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 06:38 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Nov 16 2016, 06:30 PM) As ever, I believe its budget issue as well as operational requirements We have plenty of exocet stockpile laying about and MBDA offers upgrade for MM38 to MM40 block 26 Kedahs x 8 missiles x about EUR 1m each = Rm224 million Thats not chump change. Even if we arm just 2 Kedahs at a time, thats Rm75M... its the choice between up gunning the Kedahs with token* antiship weapons or buying another 1.5 LMS platforms... choose. *with the vast array of SAMs and CIWS in existence the best antship weapon is a sublaunched torpedo. Thats the Western doctrine anyway. P.s. RAM missile is the same price and come in 21 round launcher... you figure that price out I already Damn it looks big! The ships are old. If it saves money to decom then, we should. Similar to UK Armed Forces, suck up a capability gap for 5-10 years then come back into the game with a bigger wallet |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 07:31 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
189 posts Joined: Aug 2015 From: Cherasboy |
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Nov 16 2016, 06:38 PM) I dunno, if atreyu can explain why we do not use them if they are "lying around"...?Wild-ass guess here: perhaps they have an operational lifespan, if we take them out of store and install that means they start to depreciate already, in a few years will need to buy replacement? |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 07:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Nov 16 2016, 06:38 PM) I'm reaching out on a limb here, but is it possible to take out the Exocet launch units from the old missile boats that we're about to retire on arrival of the LMS and install them on the Kedah-class OPVs? IIRC Exocet systems are pretty modular anyway. If the FCS is already installed and all it takes is for to activate it is the installation of launch units why not go for it? It still doesn't solve the Kedah-class' current lack of anti-air capabilities, but hey, at least it's better than nothing. |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 07:57 PM
|
|
Elite
1,157 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Petaling Jaya |
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Nov 16 2016, 05:30 PM) As ever, I believe its budget issue as well as operational requirements Lms have higher priority as they are to replace the old laksamana class.6 Kedahs x 8 missiles x about EUR 1m each = Rm224 million Thats not chump change. Even if we arm just 2 Kedahs at a time, thats Rm75M... its the choice between up gunning the Kedahs with token* antiship weapons or buying another 1.5 LMS platforms... choose. *with the vast array of SAMs and CIWS in existence the best antship weapon is a sublaunched torpedo. Thats the Western doctrine anyway. P.s. RAM missile is the same price and come in 21 round launcher... you figure that price out I already Damn it looks big! The ships are old. If it saves money to decom then, we should. Similar to UK Armed Forces, suck up a capability gap for 5-10 years then come back into the game with a bigger wallet As for arming kedah class that will have to wait for opportunity during midlife upgrade. |
|
|
Nov 16 2016, 08:06 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Nov 16 2016, 08:31 PM) I dunno, if atreyu can explain why we do not use them if they are "lying around"...? These missiles are self containedWild-ass guess here: perhaps they have an operational lifespan, if we take them out of store and install that means they start to depreciate already, in a few years will need to buy replacement? |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0295sec
0.79
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 09:13 AM |