QUOTE(xtemujin @ Sep 16 2016, 12:01 PM)
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 16 2016, 06:09 PM)
Thank you for notifying me about this. I have updated the links accordingly.
Military Thread V22
|
|
Sep 17 2016, 02:26 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jun 2014 From: Pulau Pinang, Malaysia |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2016, 06:43 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
i know there is possibility of navy getting prc ships
ima fine on getting their hulls but not their weapons/sensor/radar QUOTE Indonesian president watches failed firings of Chinese-made C-705 missiles at naval exercise Key Points -Attempts to launch C-705 missiles from two Indonesian warships during an exercise has failed -Failures come against the backdrop of increased spending on Chinese-made weapon systems by Jakarta The Indonesian Navy's (Tentara Nasional Indonesia - Angkatan Laut, or TNI-AL's) attempt to successfully launch Chinese-made C-705 anti-ship missiles from two indigenously built attack craft during a major naval exercise has failed, sources from within the service informed IHS Jane's on 15 September. The missiles, which were deployed onboard the KCR-40-class missile attack craft KRI Clurit (641) and KRI Kujang (642), each failed at different stages of their launches on 14 September. Clurit and Kujang each fired a single C-705 missile during Exercise 'Armada Jaya' 2016 which was conducted in the Java Sea. Both attempts were made in full view of Indonesian President Joko Widodo who was there to witness the exercise from onboard the landing platform dock ship KRI Banjarmasin (592). Accompanying him was TNI-AL chief Admiral Ade Supandi, and Indonesian Armed Forces (TNI) chief General Gatot Nurmantyo. According to TNI-AL sources, the first C-705 deployed on Clurit failed to launch upon command, but fired unexpectedly about five minutes later after the ship's crew failed to observe a misfire procedure. The missile failed to hit its designated target for the exercise, the recently decommissioned Tisza-class auxiliary support ship, Karimata (960). The second C-705 missile, which was fired from Kujang , failed during mid-flight, and subsequently also failed to hit the same target. http://www.janes.com/article/63815/indones...-naval-exercise ![]() |
|
|
Sep 17 2016, 06:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
397 posts Joined: Jan 2016 From: Hong Kong |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2016, 07:31 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Sep 17 2016, 06:43 PM) i know there is possibility of navy getting prc ships The Janes article is not entirely correct.ima fine on getting their hulls but not their weapons/sensor/radar ![]() 1. Only KRI Clurit fired the missile. KRI Kujang did not fired any missile. 2. KRI Clurit did not fired the missile unexpectedly. The countdown by the KRI Clurit commander to launch the missile can be seen from the video below. Credit to babycebong. http://tinypic.com/player.php?v=2j32ydk&s=9#.V90oYjilbHx ![]() This post has been edited by azriel: Sep 17 2016, 07:34 PM |
|
|
Sep 17 2016, 09:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
397 posts Joined: Jan 2016 From: Hong Kong |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2016, 09:17 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 17 2016, 07:31 PM) The Janes article is not entirely correct. looks like a very2 conflicting reports from several local sources which then got quoted by janes1. Only KRI Clurit fired the missile. KRI Kujang did not fired any missile. 2. KRI Clurit did not fired the missile unexpectedly. The countdown by the KRI Clurit commander to launch the missile can be seen from the video below. Credit to babycebong. http://tinypic.com/player.php?v=2j32ydk&s=9#.V90oYjilbHx ![]() after researching it looks like the kri clurit indeed launches the c-705 missile but failed in mid-flight and the kri kujang was tasked as the backup launcher in case the first launch didnt succeed but did not launch its c-705 missile as for the second c-705 missile failure it seems the report stemmed from the sut torpedo failure launched by the kri ajak and for some reason the launch of c-802 missile from kri layang was cancelled wonder why the erroneous reporting even though the event was hugely covered by the media? This post has been edited by DDG_Ross: Sep 17 2016, 09:24 PM |
|
|
Sep 17 2016, 10:29 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Sep 17 2016, 09:17 PM) looks like a very2 conflicting reports from several local sources which then got quoted by janes AFAIK the target ex-KRI Karimata was sunk by the torpedo sut.after researching it looks like the kri clurit indeed launches the c-705 missile but failed in mid-flight and the kri kujang was tasked as the backup launcher in case the first launch didnt succeed but did not launch its c-705 missile as for the second c-705 missile failure it seems the report stemmed from the sut torpedo failure launched by the kri ajak and for some reason the launch of c-802 missile from kri layang was cancelled wonder why the erroneous reporting even though the event was hugely covered by the media? All medias were on the LPD KRI Banjarmasin together with Jokowi. So they don't know what actually was happening inside KRI Clurit. For medias a bad news is a good news. |
|
|
Sep 17 2016, 10:46 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
QUOTE Indonesia's PT Pindad and Saab collaborate on air defence Jon Grevatt, Bangkok - IHS Jane's Defence Weekly 16 September 2016 State-owned Indonesian defence company PT Pindad has joined forces with Saab to collaborate on offering the Swedish company's Ground Based Air Defence (GBAD) system to the Indonesian Ministry of Defense (MoD). PT Pindad said on 15 September that the collaborative programme will focus on adhering to the requirements laid out in Indonesia's Defence Industry Law 2012 (also known as Law 16), which obliges foreign contractors to engage with local companies in producing, supplying, and maintaining imported products. The two companies recently held a workshop at PT Pindad's facilities in Bandung to outline their proposal to the MoD and the Indonesian National Armed Forces (Tentara Nasional Indonesia: TNI). http://www.janes.com/article/63878/indones...-on-air-defence |
|
|
Sep 18 2016, 12:15 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
Jane‘s have controversial with china military leader also with internet fans ... that why always report bad think on china.
|
|
|
Sep 18 2016, 03:41 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 17 2016, 10:29 PM) AFAIK the target ex-KRI Karimata was sunk by the torpedo sut. any official sources on the exercise result? i dunno which one is true anymoreAll medias were on the LPD KRI Banjarmasin together with Jokowi. So they don't know what actually was happening inside KRI Clurit. For medias a bad news is a good news. i know there is selective journalism but this is pure blatant lie already |
|
|
Sep 18 2016, 04:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2016, 08:09 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Sep 18 2016, 03:41 AM) any official sources on the exercise result? i dunno which one is true anymore The Indonesian Navy still evaluating the missile test. i know there is selective journalism but this is pure blatant lie already QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 18 2016, 04:10 AM) That is why need more live firing exercise. There is no guarrantees that every missiles launched will hit it's target. Even the Harpoon missile fired from the LCS USS Coronado failed to hit the target during RIMPAC 2016.LCS Missile Shoot Is ‘Successful’ — But a Miss This post has been edited by azriel: Sep 18 2016, 11:30 AM |
|
|
Sep 18 2016, 11:44 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
397 posts Joined: Jan 2016 From: Hong Kong |
Norwegian hostage freed by al Qaeda-linked group in Philippines
![]() MANILA: A Norwegian man held hostage by the al Qaeda-linked Abu Sayyaf Islamist militant group in the southern Philippines since September last year was freed on Saturday, Philippine officials said. The group seized Kjartan Sekkingstad from an upscale resort on Samal island in Davao del Norte along with a Filipina, who has already been freed, and two Canadians, whom the militants later executed. Abu Sayyaf, based in the south of the mainly Roman Catholic Philippines, is known for kidnappings, beheadings and extortion. It had initially demanded one billion pesos (US$21 million) each for the detainees, but it later lowered the ransom to 300 million pesos each. The group released Sekkingstad in the town of Patikul in the Sulu Archipelago and he is now in the custody of Nur Misuari, founder of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF), in the regional capital Jolo, said Jesus Dureza, a peace adviser to the Philippines' president. ![]() Sekkingstad had been due to meet President Rodrigo Duterte later on Saturday but the meeting was cancelled due to bad weather. "His first words when I spoke to him on the phone (were): "Thank you to President Duterte," Dureza said in a statement. "His release from captivity capped months of quiet, patient but determined efforts with the assistance of all sectors." Major Filemon Tan, spokesman of the military's Western Mindanao Command, said the release of Sekkingstad was the result of "intense" military operations against the Abu Sayyaf. ![]() Tan also credited the MNLF for helping the government in seeking the release of the Norwegian. In Oslo, the government welcomed the development but remained cautious, noting that Sekkingstad was not yet in government custody. "We are still working on this and we will not rejoice until Sekkingstad is safe and sound with Philippine authorities," Norwegian foreign minister Boerge Brende said in an emailed statement to Reuters, adding that "it would likely happen tomorrow". "We are following the situation closely and are working together Philippine authorities to bring Sekkkingstad to safety," he said. Abu Sayyaf beheaded the two Canadians it seized last year with Sekkingstad, the first one in April and the other in June, after a deadline for the payment of ransom money lapsed. The Filipina victim was released in June. ![]() It was unclear whether a ransom had been paid in exchange for Sekkingstad's freedom, but it is widely believed that no captives are released by the group without it. Security experts say brokers, messengers and go-betweens are involved at multiple levels, some taking substantial cuts. Payments are euphemistically called "board and lodgings". The group has made tens of millions of dollars from ransom money since it was formed in the 1990s, security experts say, channelling it into guns, grenade launchers, high-powered boats and modern equipment. - Reuters 8 |
|
|
Sep 18 2016, 12:50 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
![]() QUOTE You Win Some, You Lose Some… Marhalim Abas September 18, 2016 Malaysia -RMN SHAH ALAM: You Win Some, You Lose Some. In the previous post, we discussed about the possibility of the RMN getting more hulls, specifically China-made warships. Several readers suggested that there wasn’t not enough funds for RMN to get its cake and eat it too. While its true that maintaining a bunch of old ships is hard on the RMN, its operational budget has really taken a beating since it started operating the submarines. And its RMK11 development budget is being consumed by the LCS. The 15-to-5 plan – it is claimed – will solve the operational budget issue by reducing the hull types from the current 15 to five. However, I do not think this will solve the issue completely as the RMN still needs a higher operational budget. If the plan is approve and the RMN gets more hulls, its imperative its gets higher operational budget, otherwise it cannot afford to operate the ships! But how is the RMN going to get new hulls – whether or not based on the 15-to-5 plan – when the development budget has been consumed by the LCS? Well, you win some, you lose some. In my post,Five Things We Are Getting in RMK11, I wrote that the RMN ASW helicopters has been green-lighted. "The project to equip the RMN with six ASW helicopters was supposed to be funded in RMK10. However it was deferred. Fortunately it has now been revealed that the project had been approved for RMK11" Industry sources have told me that since the emphasis is for RMN to get more more hulls, it is likely that the ASW helicopters funding would be diverted to the project instead. Whether or not this will mean that it’s getting the two C28A corvette or four LMS we discussed previously, is beyond me at the moment, however. And there are moves to get the ASW helicopter project off the ground, most likely by upgrading them. "At DSA 2016, Global Komited Sdn Bhd signed an agreement with Finmeccanica for the promotion, marketing and distribution of AW159 naval helicopters to the Malaysian government. The agreement also covers the upgrade of the current Super Lynx helicopters in service with RMN." I have been told that apart from buying new build ASW helicopters, RMN Super Lynx could be upgraded with ASW equipment instead. The upgrading route is being pursued although an industry source told me that fitting the Super Lynx with ASW equipment will be an expensive and tedious affair. Several local industry sources however disputed this saying it was just a smoke screen for us to buy new build helicopters. They insisted upgrading the Super Lynx helicopters for ASW was a viable project although the OEM was not so keen about it. Furthermore, by turning the ASW program into an upgrade project, will result in it being funded by the operational budget. Whatever, the case, the project has been shelved – for the moment at least – as the intention is now to get more hulls for the RMN, ASAP. You win some, you lose some. http://www.malaysiandefence.com/you-win-some-you-lose-some/ This post has been edited by azriel: Sep 18 2016, 12:53 PM |
|
|
Sep 18 2016, 04:38 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#35
|
![]()
Newbie
3 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 17 2016, 07:31 PM) The Janes article is not entirely correct. 1. Only KRI Clurit fired the missile. KRI Kujang did not fired any missile. 2. KRI Clurit did not fired the missile unexpectedly. The countdown by the KRI Clurit commander to launch the missile can be seen from the video below. Credit to babycebong. http://tinypic.com/player.php?v=2j32ydk&s=9#.V90oYjilbHx ![]() It seems miss fire from this video..macet.. |
|
|
Sep 18 2016, 05:21 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
from defense pakistan, simple to said C-705 made in indo without GPS/Beidou module,so missile only can shot target from direct radar guidance
QUOTE The news is Wrong, just One Indonesian Navy ship that shot C-705 Missile "KRI Clurit" Source: http://defence.pk/threads/indonesian-presi...2#ixzz4Kb74UwyCWhy there is delay, when C-705 launching? Because there is Communication problem between KRI Banjarmasin that President Joko Widodo boarded and KRI Clurit that shot C-705 Missile. The crew in "KRI Clurit" doesn't know, when our President Mr.Joko Widodo starting count down. Why C-705 Missile miss the target? Just answer it by yourself. The Target ship is 50 Kilometers (30 nm) away from "KRI Clurit" but Radar sensor in "KRI Clurit" is SR-47A with Max range 40 Kilometers. So ........ We can get the answer :-) That's why Datalink is so Important in Modern naval warfare. ![]() This post has been edited by waja2000: Sep 18 2016, 05:22 PM |
|
|
Sep 18 2016, 05:40 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Feb 2014 From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 18 2016, 05:21 PM) from defense pakistan, simple to said C-705 made in indo without GPS/Beidou module,so missile only can shot target from direct radar guidance i dont think they have started production yet on the locally made c-705Source: http://defence.pk/threads/indonesian-presi...2#ixzz4Kb74UwyC ![]() earliest local c-705 production will only start 2017 or 2018 |
|
|
Sep 18 2016, 07:08 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2016, 07:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 18 2016, 12:50 PM) It can't be helped. Navies usually costs a lot more than any other service branches to arm and maintain. Even US military allocates nearly half of all its $ 600 Billion USD resources to the US Navy alone.Entity Army $244.9 billion 31.8% Marine Corps $40.6 billion 4% Total Budget taken allotted from Department of Navy Navy $379.8 billion 43.4% Excluding Marine Corps Air Force $170.6 billion 22% sos If want good Navy, you have to dump massive amounts of money on it, no choice. This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Sep 19 2016, 07:48 AM |
|
|
Sep 19 2016, 07:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
318 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Singapura, Singapore |
Actually the explanation is very amateurish, if target at 50km and radar at maximum range at 40km, does not make sense to fire it during a live firing for the president.
Also have to note that there will also be China contractors on watch to check the live firing. QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 18 2016, 05:21 PM) from defense pakistan, simple to said C-705 made in indo without GPS/Beidou module,so missile only can shot target from direct radar guidance Source: http://defence.pk/threads/indonesian-presi...2#ixzz4Kb74UwyC ![]() |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0293sec
0.51
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 12:34 PM |