any official sources on the exercise result? i dunno which one is true anymore
i know there is selective journalism but this is pure blatant lie already 

Actually the explanation is very amateurish, if target at 50km and radar at maximum range at 40km, does not make sense to fire it during a live firing for the president.

Also have to note that there will also be China contractors on watch to check the live firing.

Or maybe the system or cpu hang..

means indo navy no network datalink linked, so just depend own ship radar provide guidance. 
if look it is low cost ship, it should be possible.
in other forum said C-705 indo spec without include GPS/baidu module.

With over 30 years of officially being labelled as the Great Satan by the Muslim world, and the source of their grudge extending all the way back to 1945, they have no choice.
I dunno, is inertial guidance module very common now? my brain still stuck in Cold War era where inertial guidance is "SO HIGH TECH"
I'm not talking about network link, which I assume is beyond the capability of these cheapo China antiship missiles. I'm saying it seems quite ridiculous that anyone would fire a guided missile without the onboard targeting system actually acquiring the target, which would be the case if it was out of range. I mean surely even if its some kind of cheapo targeting system, if the target is 50km out when it firing a 40km missile, there must be a big sign on the system that says OUT OF RANGE....

....maybe it was written in Chinese

C-705 have 140km range。
just see wiki， C-705 have Radar seeker too，but not sure how operator set the target. and what range of missile radar seeker.
is posible Indo navy operater still lack of training ?

india still needs to pay 7.8b euro...

Btw, lets compare to others deal.

Egypt bought 24 units(plus package) for 5.2b euro  ( 217m euro per units @ rm997m
Qatar bought 24 units(plus package)for  6.3b euro  (262m euro per unit @  rm 1.2b

Comparing these deals, the amount still around rm1b per unit plus packages...

lel.
inkaming K2 vs Type 10 MBT argument

So the LMS is ~70m ship with rm200mil/usd50mil price cap include weapons etc
ASM system maybe can scrap older Exocet/Otomat launcher from inventory

at recent lima .. boustead did offer scaled down kedah class for lms. why didnt we go there.

it would be much cheaper because we already owned the meko design rite? or because gov didnt want boustead involving with another project till lcs complete?

Any particular reason why RMAF didn't consider Mi-35 in the first place?

AW Boleh, Airbus Bole......
Indian bole......
why not Maressia ? 

Eurocopters already have MRO plant right next ro AgustaWestland in Subang

Got anti ship missile lar.
It just that the ship is optimised for aid defence.

I think lot of ppl underestimated the seaceptor performance.
Currently its actual performance still classified probably its optimum performance yet to determine.
CAMM performance is suspected to be in btw aster 15 and essm.
CAMM-ER probably very close to aster 30.
Besides the ship can pack more camm missile compare to aster solutions.

i means many county mindef/Navy.
for our navy maybe is budget. Millennium 30mm gun more expensive than MSI connon? 
but MSI 30mm gun advantage is we more experience/familiar using it. (culture)

Read more: http://www.fnss.com.tr/en/news/fnss-and-pt...eight-tank-mmwt