Not really Canon related but I edited this out of boredom

Its amazing what you can do with PS.

Nice!

Nice one! Where did you get the sun from?

Guys, any of u here used 17 40 and 16 35 before?

What is the main difference u guys feel?

was in dilemma as well between 1740 and 16-35 f2.8 II sometime ago. but ended up with 17-40 because of the size, which is a somewhat important for me. and of course the price as well.

i'd say that if you do not need the extra stop of light, then 17-40 would be a really good one to go with. and for IQ, i think both of these are not extremely good at it if you are shooting wide open. at least not for the 17-40. having said that, it's good enough for me. and the extra 1mm difference, which doesnt matter to me as well since i've a 14mm to cover that

so to me, the main difference is the size and extra stop of light (which is not tht important for me in this case)

P/S: 16-35 f4 IS would be a different story tho

This post has been edited by Grajindo: Apr 4 2017, 03:48 PM

Used to be a staunch believer of not wider than 35mm

Hahaha
So that everything is straight and loved the 1.4 max aperture

Now want something wider

Thanks for the input

straight? hardly any distortion with the 16-35 f4 though

Used to have both, sold the 17-40 first later traded in the 16-35 I. The difference is in the pudding - Just an extra stop. The 16-35 I is not a great lens, sharpness is mediocre as oppose to latest canon new lenses. I recall my 17-40 is a hair sharper than my 16-35. The 16-35 II is also no a huge upgrade if one were to compare what 16-35 F4 IS has to offer.

If you want a walk around wide angle, 17-40 at F4 may be too slow. it is however, a great budget landscape lens. if money is not an issue, you should consider 16-35 F4 IS.

Thanks for the input guys, just wan to inform my sigma lens stopped working after a week tho

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B58ydk8UU...LXlpbjc3N29mTWc

Sigma 20mm f1.4

Got via kldslr and luckily the chap there is nice enough to arrange a refund for me without any questions asked

What sigma said is basically there are instances where camera and lenses doesn't connect and it's a known issue
But my case was the auto focus just stopped and next thing I realise the entire focus barrel was stuck , when u try to focus with camera u can hear motor moving but nothing actually moves and when u manual focus it just doesn't work

So yeah, deswai I need a wife angle, or else would have been happy with that 20mm
It's sharp, feels great it hand and the colour rendition is awesome

fully agreed on this too!

Typo typo. Hahahaha

by the way where to see the photos u shoot? your fb?

Yes but from the rabbit photo onwards is 35mm ah

Was just playing with the 20mm there

Very sad ending

kasi link kawan

Tough luck. That seems like the AF motor gone cold. The Sigma Art series is no doubt hold it own when it comes to image quality and value, just not assurance. There are reports of focusing accuracy issues as well. I traded in my 85L for the 85 Art, knock on wood that's working fine.

Just curious, did you ever ask Sigma if repair, how long would take them to complete the work?

KLDSLR has truck load of used Canon 24L II last time i checked, wide open sharpness and CA are a hair shy than the sigma but it's a solid piece of glass that never skip a beat.

see until before the rabbit, rabbit onwards are 35mm. https://www.facebook.com/tikpin.moo/media_s...e=3&pnref=story

24mm is not wide enough for me

This post has been edited by MooTikPin: Apr 5 2017, 04:03 PM

Any recommendation for extra battery pack?

oh man, never think of an ordinary picture can turn out so nice after some photoshopping~

Which model?

Anyone owns and used a Wide Converter(filter) before?

I mean, I got no money to go for a wide angle lens, might as well, I get a wide converter.