PPAM all lazy goyang kaki gahmen type, sure will fight for free benefit and capital gains

I heard the same thing too. Developer simply squeezed all the facilities (gym room, multi purpose hall, management office etc.) into residential units and don't even bother to put up fence to separate low cost housing from service apartments.

Now developer just want to cabut by going for listing

why will someone buy the open market unit here?

ask you do MOT fast fast so they can dissolve Vistarena and wash hand, then IPO not affected by this prop liao.

as per discussion going around the internet, open units kena con by developer and salesman say will split PPAM and open unit blocks.

but end product come out, PPAM and open unit is not split.

Parking

Sole reason why I skipped rumawip sg besi. Not gona fomo.

This post has been edited by soulred777: Apr 29 2023, 07:49 PM

The issue is all components under single master title. Under SMA, all of them need to have standardized unit rate. On hindsight developer should subdivide the land (or they are aware but simply bet on uneducated purchasers) before selling each component. But the way all the component joint and sit on common area, I think the land cannot be split as well.

The only solution now is formation of sub-MC. Then each component can take care own common area and contribute to shared facilities such as guardhouse.

Low effort project entirely with so much disputes. RIP buyers.

Block A and B common problems is built quality. Leaking is here and there. Built material terrible. Some part of the wall can be punched. Haha

Very bad planning by developer such as the facilties placing.. half ramp system that make you travel 3km down to the exits from level 7, glacier shot put from water drainage at lower level, tnb sub station at front side but shoplot facing backward…

The most funniest thing is their marketing. Clumsy and caca merba on how they divide the facilities. Its acceptable that the PPAM unit dont have the pools but very kelakar the taman outside are only for block B, while the surau is for all residence (which only can fit 10 people).

The marketing also very confusing that made block A and B comes into arguement about the entrance. Marketing team says there will be 2nd entrance for PPAM while there is no such thing in SNP.

Yes. Putting 3 scheme in 1 project is such headache as PPAM price is wayyyyyyy cheaper than RUMAWIP and wayyyyyyyyyyyy cheaper than OP

Sounds like you own a unit here.

Dumb ass reply. Lol.

What kind of fuck up project is this? Developer is really that teruk ar?

However fked up, still VPed, owners have to sit down and decide how to move on. Open market buyers definitively on the losing end already

2nd lelong unit sold from here today.
at 3rd round reauction.

single bidder won unchallenged at 453,600.
for 1250sqft dual key unit.

first lelong unit also sold at this price end of last year.

good catch?

3 car park. And the psf is almost similar with the rumahwip

Wondering why is single bidder

Doesn't matter how fucked up it is. The lawsuit is still ongoing. Announced at Bursa.

I bought some of their shares when it fell upon IPO. Now I know why and tomorrow I shall sell

Haha.. exactly what i have expected from day 1 of the new service apartment integration living framework. Good luck, valuation drag/ dent is real.

More to come, not only this project

This post has been edited by jojolicia: Jun 14 2023, 09:29 AM

This is not the only nor first integrated subsidised and open unit development, only problem is that they didn’t follow to the initial “segregation” and making things worse