All on the same one master title. Not just this project but other combo project the same such as Harve / Jalilmas, Parkhill / PPAM BJ, PV18 / vista langkawi, etc.

very very difficult to resolve this, have to reconsider even bidding for the lelong unit...

PPMP
- feel discriminated because they unable to access to the play ground and basketball court, where is just next to them, can see cannot use.
- PPMP kid might ask their parent "why we cannot go play ground and basket ball court? why the kid at another side starring at us like we are monster? why the scold us thief?"
- a little of PPMP kid/ppl will confirm snip in to access those play ground/ basket ball/ swim pool / gym, then get caught, and people start fighting again.
Rumahwip + Bebas :
- they feel not balance because they paying for more $ for this property
- when they saw PPMP people using their facility, they will angry for sure, because this a act of thief
- if turn out unable to stop PPMP accessing play ground and basket ball court, they decide put up a sign board "no PPMP access to this facility" den GG create more conflict
- Bebas paying for 500k++ for this property.... this price top up a little bit can get a way better environment in same area in subsales market.

feel sad for the owner

Heard that strata title already issued out.
So whoever with more number of owners completed title perfection will be able to control majority in the MC.

As a record at Parkhill / PPAM BJ, PPAM managed to vote in majority JMB members during the first AGM.

So if they get a quorum ie majority then the PPAM can demand for access to the facilities?

Of course developer is the one who cause the problem.
But why Block B wanna put all their anger to block A residence since we wont accept their proposal to saperate the entrance. Thats our right to use the entrance AS PER STATED IN OUR SNP. several times Block B play backdoor trick with developer yet still not success to do that.

Both blocks separated got own account.
Block A maintaining their own block.
Block B maintaining their own block.
The guardhouse and common area inside the compound, guess is still grey area need to be discussed but most probably the maintenance costs at this area will be shared equally 50-50.

It is a race now I guess between both blocks to completed the strata title MOT. Once hit 25%, an AGM will be called upon. And whoever got more title perfected will gain the upper hand during voting in MC members.

This is not the first combo project around. Aset Kayamas already got a few.
if you join their AGM, is conducted in a funny manner coz AGM must be conducted together.

got 2 chairperson for the AGM. got 2 sets of property management company running the AGM.
each agenda will be separated, example first rumahwip then bebas. such as audited financial report for rumahwip first. then rumahwip will discuss. follow by financial report for bebas. then bebas will discuss. then only go to the next agenda. is like joining 2 AGM.

the real tussle only happen during the agenda of electing representatives.

Separated compound but under one master title.

First AGM for the formation of MC of this messy development just concluded today.
As expected Block A with more number of genuine own stay owners and got the more number of eligible voters and attendees and majority as the MC members.

Hearsay the AGM started from morning until right before buka puasa.
Developer tried to propose the second guardhouse during the AGM but was voted against during the AGM. Hence I think blok B will continue to pursue the issue via the court.