Definitely a story…500++ unit owners are in bloodbath over the a proj that was sold back to 2017, still not getting their keys until today. It was declared abandoned and buyers are in deep financial trouble…whole Kuchai Lama know this famous proj

Oh gosh. Would the whole development just be considered affordable housing in subsale and downgraded to the PPAM price?

Another unforeseen outcome and another one to add to the bank of horror stories to scare new homebuyers.

More horror stories the better, need a bigger base of home renters, not owners

should be 50/50, rumawip actually on the same boat as bebas (whether or not all bebas owner agree on this idk)

So if they get a quorum ie majority then the PPAM can demand for access to the facilities?

Depends on SPA/DMC

However implementation is separate issue. Example if access made free for all, how to stop all residents from using it?

Based on that protest video, the only thing stopping the PPAM is a chain link fence. It’s not a good implementation and does make it seem like a prison.

So be wary if you’re buying into a mixed development.

Developer just need pusing for 2 years then let the owners fight amongst themselves 😂

Lesson learnt for all. If you see mix projects within one development then avoid at all cost.

Of course developer is the one who cause the problem.
But why Block B wanna put all their anger to block A residence since we wont accept their proposal to saperate the entrance. Thats our right to use the entrance AS PER STATED IN OUR SNP. several times Block B play backdoor trick with developer yet still not success to do that.

Better Avoid platinum victory/radium project at all cost.

SNP block A-share entrance
SNP block B-i never see it yet. But based on the feedback and comment from Block b residence also hv 1 entrance. The only source on idea of saperate entrance is developer sales person verbal promise to Block B buyer before they sign SNP.

Hmm so far I don’t see any statement block B blaming block A on this so I can’t comment.

What is this backdoor trick ya? Assuming this is all salahan developer, theoretically one should deal with developer directly instead of sending the proposal to another block. Just my 2 cent

It’s the atypical divide and conquer tactic endemic to the country’s politics.

Full priced buyers will always feel entitled and the PPAM will feel short changed. So who has power wins - exercise your democratic privilege to vote and don’t be complacent whichever side of the fence you sit on.

Don’t forget to give us forumers a show.

If there's a backdoor trick that you claim there is one, why didn't the separation happen yet? Just wondering. If the backdoor thing they want to take over so badly it will happen already.

Property overhang and unsold units at historic high, facts does not lie

For clarity, can you share the screenshot of the site plan? or it is just specified in second schedule (list of common facilities)?

Just realised I didn't reply to this comment...

If block A is shared with block B and block B was told it's separate, shouldn't it be the case you ask block B for permission to use? But again you said in SPA got mention, which is weird because this kind of thing won't be mention unless it's clearly written down how the (existing) guard house is to be used.

That land supposed not to built high rise anyway. Just look at the surrounding beside Parklane and PPR surrounding. Not sure hows the tiny road cope with the traffic especially PPAM & rumahwip given only one car park

i dont recall this poroject have seperate entry during the launching time.
the only promise given is block acesss where block a cant go block b and block b cant go block a. that all