Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
120 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V18

views
     
BorneoAlliance
post Sep 19 2015, 07:31 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Chinese armed forces arrive in Malaysia for joint military exercise

user posted image

Chinese navy fleets arrive for the military exercise coded "Peace and Friendship 2015" jointly held by China and Malaysia, in Pelaboham Kelang, Malaysia, Sept. 17, 2015. (Photo: Xinhua/Jiang Shan)

Chinese navy fleets arrived here on Thursday for a military exercise jointly held by China and Malaysia.

The drill, coded "Peace and Friendship 2015," is conducted according to consensus reached between high-level military leaders of the two countries.

It includes exercises for joint escort, joint search and rescue, hijacked vessel rescue, weapons use, humanitarian rescue and disaster relief.

So far, Chinese armed forces participating in the mission have all successfully reached the exercising area.

The Chinese navy fleets left a port in Sanya in south China's Hainan Province on Sept. 12.

The medical team for humanitarian assistance and disaster relief operations arrived in Malaysia's Subang Airport on Wednesday by Chinese military aircraft.

The engineering team arrived on September 7 and has started the joint exercise with the Malaysian side according to plan.

It is the first joint drill between the two armed forces and also the largest bilateral military exercise between China and a country from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

http://www.ecns.cn/military/2015/09-18/181628.shtml
kerolzarmyfanboy
post Sep 19 2015, 07:37 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Sep 19 2015, 07:26 PM)
so basically in Syria's Civil War,

Russia + Iran + Hezbollah + Assad's Syria VS USA + FSA + Saudi + Qatar

James831
post Sep 19 2015, 07:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
152 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: somewhere in PJ


QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Sep 19 2015, 07:37 PM)
so basically in Syria's Civil War,

Russia + Iran + Hezbollah + Assad's Syria  VS  USA + FSA + Saudi + Qatar
*
Add ISIS to the list too.
BorneoAlliance
post Sep 19 2015, 07:45 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Let’s Pretend: What Happens If the US and China Clash in the Pacific?

user posted image

The recently released 430-page report written by 14 scholars on military strategy focuses strictly on military might. Ignoring political policy issues, "US-China Military Scorecard: Forces, Geography, and the Evolving Balance of Power, 1997-2017" considers two hypothetical scenarios – a Spratly islands campaign and a Chinese invasion of Taiwan – to gauge which side would win.

Chinese Air Base Attack

While the Chinese military had only a handful of short-range ballistic missiles in 1997, that number has now risen sharply. With nearly 1,400 in Beijing’s arsenal, those missiles could easily cripple the Kadena Air Base, a US installation on the island of Okinawa.

"Committed attacks might close a single base for weeks," the report reads, and that could dramatically increase the distance that the US Air Force would be required to travel. Forcing the US military to operate out of Alaska, Guam, or Hawaii could give China more time to react to offensive maneuvers.

US vs. Chinese Air Superiority

Beijing has seen a rapid improvement in its air force, modernizing half of its fighter jets. According to RAND, the two nations’ capabilities in the air are almost comparable, with a slight advantage given to the US.

Still, in protecting Taiwan during a hypothetical invasion in 2017, "US commanders would be unable to find the basing required for US forces to prevail in a seven-day campaign," the report reads.

While the US could gain an advantage if it drew out such an operation into a longer campaign, that action could also put ground and naval troops at a greater risk.

US Airspace Penetration

The Chinese military has added a large number of surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems since 1997. With nearly 200 now in Beijing’s arsenal, as well as improved air detection systems, US aircraft would have a difficult time operating in the Taiwan scenario, given its proximity to the Chinese mainland and those defenses.

In a Spratly scenario, however, US stealth aircraft could gain the upper hand, given the archipelago’s 800-mile distance from the Chinese mainland.

US Air Base Attack

American long-range weapons could give the US the capability to shut down Chinese air bases. Looking at 40 bases within range of Taiwan, the US would be capable of closing airstrips for approximately eight hours. Adjusting for 2017, those closures could last for two to three days.

Still, the report acknowledges that this advantage relies on a limited missile stockpile.

"While ground attack represents a rare bright spot for relative US performance, it is important to note that the inventory of standoff weapons is finite, and performance in a longer conflict would depend on a wider range of factors," the report reads.

Chinese Anti-Surface Warfare

While Washington would inevitably rely on aircraft carriers if war were to break out in the South China Sea, Beijing’s development of anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBM) could pose a significant threat to US naval forces.

While those carriers may be able to successfully defend against any ASBM with onboard countermeasures, the US would also have to contend with China’s improved intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities and submarine fleet.

US Anti-Surface Warfare

In the Taiwan scenario, RAND estimates that the US would fare well in repelling Chinese amphibious assaults. Able to eliminate roughly 40% of the amphibious fleet, China could suffer "losses that would likely wreak havoc on the organizational integrity of a landing force."

China has, however, already doubled its amphibious capabilities since 1997, and is rapidly improving its anti-submarine potential.

US Counterspace

Washington has been improving its counterspace capabilities since 2002, and features the Counter Communication System, which can jam enemy satellites. Ballistic missile interceptors could also be used to bring down intelligence satellites.

RAND also recommends that the US create high-energy laser systems which could overwhelm the Chinese space program.

Chinese Counterspace

The report calls the threat to US communication satellites "severe," based on a series of successful anti-satellite missile tests conducted by Beijing since 2007.

"More worrisome" is China’s possession of Russian-made jamming systems.

US vs. China Cyberwar

RAND estimates that the sophistication of US Cyber Command and the US National Security Agency would give Washington a cyber advantage during wartime.

Both sides, however, would "nevertheless face significant surprises." The report also points out that the US relies heavily on unclassified Internet networks, which could be easily breached by enemy hackers.


Nuclear Stability

While China has steadily improved its nuclear forces since 1997, it is still far from robust enough to prevent a retaliatory strike from the US, which has a significant stockpile. RAND gives the US a nuclear advantage of 13 to one.

Conclusion

The report predicts that China’s growing military power could create a large decrease in US influence in the Pacific region. Beijing could, hypothetically, "achieve limited objectives without defeating US forces."

"Geographically – the 'bones of strategy' – vastly complicates the challenges faced by the United States," the report reads.

While both sides would suffer heavy losses, the United States doesn’t hold the same kind of Pacific dominance that it once did.

http://sputniknews.com/asia/20150919/10272...S-vs-China.html
patt_sue
post Sep 19 2015, 08:04 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
867 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


Repelling between PLAN heli and KD Kelantan....

Btw, what type of heli is this? almost similar to heli owned by mmea
user posted image
waja2000
post Sep 19 2015, 08:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(patt_sue @ Sep 19 2015, 08:04 PM)
Repelling between PLAN heli and KD Kelantan....

Btw, what type of heli is this? almost similar to heli owned by mmea
*
Eurocopter Dauphin
azriel
post Sep 19 2015, 08:18 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
BAE Systems - Type 26 Global Combat Ship Simulation.


xtemujin
post Sep 19 2015, 08:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
318 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Singapura, Singapore


Harbin Z9.

QUOTE(patt_sue @ Sep 19 2015, 08:04 PM)
Repelling between PLAN heli and KD Kelantan....

Btw, what type of heli is this? almost similar to heli owned by mmea
user posted image
*
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Sep 19 2015, 08:56 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(patt_sue @ Sep 19 2015, 08:04 PM)
Repelling between PLAN heli and KD Kelantan....

Btw, what type of heli is this? almost similar to heli owned by mmea
user posted image
*
Harbin Z9. A close copy of EC Dauphin.

This post has been edited by MrUbikeledek: Sep 19 2015, 08:56 PM
minizian
post Sep 19 2015, 09:48 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,074 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Verdun



QUOTE(cleaner @ Sep 18 2015, 10:59 AM)
Can get it here, Subang Air Base
*
so is this item ACTUALLY used by the armed forces or just by someone who is very creative in making these kind of thing happend to be in Air force? hmm.gif

So now Syraian civil will be some huge rojak bowl with every one the fray... Even the aussies are in too

This post has been edited by minizian: Sep 19 2015, 09:56 PM
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Sep 19 2015, 10:33 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 19 2015, 03:38 PM)
ya, K9 heavy too, can't carry by A400M, unless Army no require to carry by A400m,
but surprising SG Primus can make it to 30 tons, maybe material strong is different.
*
Depend on the type of armor and type of gun. K9 use steel armor, while Primus use aluminium armor. Some SPG like PzH 2000 carry a heavier 52 caliber gun instead of usual 39 caliber like most SPH.
waja2000
post Sep 19 2015, 11:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 19 2015, 03:47 PM)
To tell the truth.. hardly any army transport via planes

It expensive and limited numbers
*
got may amour transport via planes.
anyway back to new support ship.
but actually base on my study our Navy should get USD180m joint high speed vessel (JHSV) as support role. off couse we still need JSS for open sea/deap sea like SCS support. so 2 JHSV + 1 JSS will be perfect.
JHSV only 1500 tons can carry 600 tons cargo and personal and just about 100 meter long, so can send MBT/8x8/future SPH easily from Penisular and sabah/sarawak.
also our navy base or port in Sarawak so small hard to park more than 150meter ship (except Sepanggar), and JHSV Draft only 3.8 meter, perfect suite to our navy base mostly in side small river like in Kuching, Semporna, Sandakan,
our Peninsular Kuantan to Sarawak/ Sabah is about 800km & 1400km from sea.
so due to JHSV can carry 600 tons include carry MBT tank and speed up to 4x knot, it can reach Sarawak in 11-12 hrs, and Sabah in 22-24hrs.
this equal to 20x time 2 way fly of A400M to carry same amount tons. yet it can't carry MBT. it means more time taken by A400M to carry same amount tons.
JHSV still can travel at 20-30 knot to save fuel, but still double speed of traditional transport ship which travel at speed 12-15 knot.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Sep 19 2015, 11:21 PM
thpace
post Sep 19 2015, 11:34 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 19 2015, 11:15 PM)
got may amour transport via planes.
anyway back to new support ship.
but actually base on my study our Navy should get USD180m joint high speed vessel (JHSV) as support role. off couse we still need JSS for open sea/deap sea like SCS support. so 2 JHSV + 1 JSS will be perfect. 
JHSV only 1500 tons can carry 600 tons cargo and personal and just about 100 meter long, so can send MBT/8x8/future SPH easily from Penisular and sabah/sarawak.
also our navy base or port in Sarawak so small hard to park more than 150meter ship (except Sepanggar), and JHSV Draft only 3.8 meter, perfect suite to our navy base mostly in side small river like in Kuching, Semporna, Sandakan,
our Peninsular Kuantan to Sarawak/ Sabah is about 800km & 1400km from sea.
so due to JHSV can carry 600 tons include carry MBT tank and speed up to 4x knot, it can reach Sarawak in 11-12 hrs, and Sabah in 22-24hrs.
this equal to 20x time 2 way fly of A400M to carry same amount tons. yet it can't carry MBT.  it means more time taken by A400M to carry same amount tons.
JHSV still can travel at 20-30 knot to save fuel, but still double speed of traditional transport ship which travel at speed 12-15 knot.
*
one at a time bro.. mpss pun belum dapat already want to next level

mpss is suppose to also resolve/elevate some of the logistic issues between east and west malaysia. Docking issue most likely will require dock upgrade but i dont see why we cant dock at commercial ports for stop gap solution. The transportation from a commercial dock is better also compared to a naval port which located far from any transportation hub

iinm the requirement was 2 mpss previously, one on duty while another on maintenance
BorneoAlliance
post Sep 19 2015, 11:38 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

CERBERUS TURNS MILITARY DOGS INTO CYBORGS

user posted image

Named for the mythical guardian of the underworld, the Cerberus camera system from Visual Engineering puts a second head on a military or police dog. On display at London’s Defence and Security Equipment International exhibition this week, Cerberus upgrades dogs of war into scouts and more.

The harness-mounted camera includes a microphone, and can be upgraded to include thermal imaging, high definition cameras, and an audio recorder. Normally flat against the dog’s back, that camera springs up when activated by a trainer, who controls it over an encrypted link from up to 1600 feet away, and can watch the video through a hand-held receiver. The whole system is battery-powered.

Armies have used dogs since there were both armies and dogs. That work has expanded from guard duty to include drug detection and bomb sniffing. Adding a camera to a working dog means that not only can it go places humans can’t, but it can stream video in real time, potentially spying ambushers or other important information. Thanks to the microphone in the Cerberus kit, a handler could then call the dog back, having gained the needed information without giving away her position. Dog, camera, and handler working together become a three-headed threat.

http://www.popsci.com/cerberus-turns-milit...gs-into-cyborgs
waja2000
post Sep 19 2015, 11:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 19 2015, 11:34 PM)
one at a time bro.. mpss pun belum dapat already want to next level
mpss is suppose to also resolve/elevate some of the logistic issues between east and west malaysia. Docking issue most likely will require dock upgrade but i dont see why we cant dock at commercial ports for stop gap solution. The transportation from a commercial dock is better also compared to a naval port which located far from any transportation hub
iinm the requirement was 2 mpss previously, one on duty while another on maintenance
*
i understand, just free chat
bcos mpss also long and seems also costly to built 1 expected usd300m each, maybe can consider cheaper solution JHSV first, smaller version also have cost less than usd 100m
well, some cargo is need high security like ammunition or missile, if can direct docking to navy base will be best solution. dock in commercial port need transport cargo and troops again to base, in much more not efficient,
In sabah commercial port only in KK/Sepanggar, other like sandakan/semporna/Tawau commercial port also small only, and location also can't allow bigger ship to come in.
not also sure need pay docking fees in commercial port or not.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Sep 19 2015, 11:49 PM
BorneoAlliance
post Sep 19 2015, 11:50 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Russia Is Concerned About America's Far-Off Space Weapons

user posted image

QUOTE
In a near-future war, 1,000 missiles scream toward Russia at Mach 20. Each one a pinpoint strike hitting the Kremlin’s nuclear missiles, military radars, submarine bases—you name it.

Within minutes, 80 percent of Russia’s nuclear arsenal is destroyed without the United States launching a single nuclear weapon of its own. Russia’s military networks are blind, the nation’s ability to strike back eliminated or severely degraded.

The incoming missiles were no ordinary weapons, but hypersonic glide vehicles developed largely in secret under the US Prompt Global Strike program. They travel so fast, shooting them down is effectively impossible.

The capability, begun as a Pentagon project in the mid-2000s, was envisioned as allowing America to strike anywhere on the globe nearly instantaneously, without resorting to nukes. In this futuristic war, it succeeds wildly.

To be sure, Prompt Global Strike is real, but the scenario above is fiction. It will take many years, and billions upon billions of dollars, to make it possible. And that’s if the technology works.

That scenario is a real fear, however, in the minds of many Russian military officials. Russian military journals regularly feature articles presenting future American hypersonic weapons as an existential threat. Far more significantly, the Pentagon’s research—haphazard as it is—has provoked a radical restructuring of the Kremlin’s armed forces.

Since the early days of the Cold War, Russia—then the Soviet Union—and the United States dared not go to war because of the presence of nuclear weapons on both sides. It would be far too dangerous for the planet and human civilization to risk an atomic exchange.

Hypersonic weapons pose a different risk. Namely, that they would make nuclear weapons obsolete. The extremely fast-moving conventional cruise missiles—and atmospheric reentry vehicles plunging down to Earth from space—could decapitate an entire nation’s command and control structure and nuclear arsenal without leading to Armageddon.

In theory. For hypersonic weapons that travel in ballistic arcs into outer space and back down again, they are indistinguishable from nuclear ICBMs. A nuclear-armed nation would have minutes to decide whether to launch a counter-strike.

The Pentagon’s far-out hypersonic weapons have had mixed results. The US Army is working on an endo-atmospheric one called the Advanced Hypersonic Weapon. The first test in 2011 was a success, as the ultra-fast missile flew 2,300 miles from Hawaii to Kwajalein Atoll in 30 minutes. Engineers aborted the second test a few seconds after taking launch.


http://motherboard.vice.com/read/russia-is...f-space-weapons
thpace
post Sep 19 2015, 11:51 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 19 2015, 11:46 PM)
i understand, just free chat
bcos mpss also long and seems also costly to built 1 expected usd300m each, maybe can consider cheaper solution JHSV first, smaller version also have cost less than usd 100m
well, some cargo is need high security like ammunition or missile, if can direct docking to navy base will be best solution. dock in commercial port need transport cargo and troops again to base, much more not efficient,  not also sure need pay docking fees in commercial port or not.
*
well, long term solution would better plus the mpss will not play only transportation role. There already a few roles we want it to play once we get it

normally, ammunition and missiles is by planes for urgent needs.

BTW, if u dont make a big huha no one will know what you are transporting whistling.gif whistling.gif
Eg no one will know not there a missile inside a container unless u write there big big "Missile inside, Please Be Careful"


BorneoAlliance
post Sep 19 2015, 11:53 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Air Force fighters will carry laser cannons, cyber weapons by 2020

user posted image

QUOTE
Sometime very soon, combat aircraft may be zapping threats out of the sky with laser weapons. “I believe we'll have a directed energy pod we can put on a fighter plane very soon,” Air Force General Hawk Carlisle said at this week’s Air Force Association Air & Space conference in a presentation on what he called Fifth-Generation Warfare. “That day is a lot closer than I think a lot of people think it is.”

Some low-power laser weapons were on display in mock-up on the exposition floor of the conference, including a system from General Atomics that could be mounted on unmanned aircraft such as the Predator and Reaper drones flown by the Air Force. But the Air Force is looking for something akin to a laser cannon for fighter aircraft, more powerful systems that could be mounted on fighters and other manned Air Force planes within the next five years, Air Force leaders said. Directed-energy weapons pods could be affixed to aircraft to destroy or disable incoming missiles, drones, and even enemy aircraft at a much lower “cost per shot” than missiles or even guns, Carlisle suggested.

The Air Force isn’t alone in seeking directed energy weapons. The US Navy has already deployed a laser weapon at sea aboard the USS Ponce, capable of a range of attacks against small boats, drones, and light aircraft posing a threat—either by blinding their sensors or operators or heating elements to make them fail or explode. Other laser weapons are also being tested by the Office of Naval Research for use on helicopters to protect against man-portable antiaircraft missiles. (And there’s a railgun, but that’s not really a directed-energy weapon, and it's too massive to be mounted on an aircraft).

The Air Force has been focused on a 150-plus kilowatt system under development by General Atomics in conjunction with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, called HELLADS. That system is now moving into ground-based testing. But based on the results so far, the Air Force leadership clearly believes that HELLADS has come far enough that it could result in a field-ready weapons system by 2020. Even a stepped-down 100 kilowatt system could be capable of damaging or destroying aircraft and ground targets as well as missiles and drones.


http://arstechnica.com/information-technol...eapons-by-2020/
waja2000
post Sep 20 2015, 12:00 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 19 2015, 11:51 PM)
well, long term solution would better plus the mpss will not play only transportation role. There already a few roles we want it to play once we get it

normally, ammunition and missiles is by planes for urgent needs.

BTW, if u dont make a big huha no one will know what you are transporting  whistling.gif  whistling.gif
Eg no one will know not there a missile inside a container unless u write there big big "Missile inside, Please Be Careful"
*
agree, MPSS still need for more role, i means we need suitable small transport ship can send lot cargo direct to all our big/small navy base west/east MY.
so reduce logistic issue and time with speed if needed.
also those JHSV, have speed so can reach location in humanitarian rescue mission area more faster compare to navy warship.
just free time chat to chat, with in shot time seems no any ship will get.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Sep 20 2015, 12:05 AM
thpace
post Sep 20 2015, 12:04 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 20 2015, 12:00 AM)
agree, MPSS still need for more role, i means we need suitable small transport ship can send lot cargo direct to all our big/small navy base west/east MY.
so reduce logistic issue and time with speed if needed.
also those JHSV, have speed so can reach location in humanitarian rescue mission area more faster compare to navy warship.
*
i think those amphibious ships with well dock will be good enough.. for those smal small transportation

120 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0271sec    0.33    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 05:10 AM