QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Sep 20 2015, 07:36 AM)
how u know..
Military Thread V18
Military Thread V18
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 09:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 10:25 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: somewhere in PJ |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 20 2015, 01:26 AM) just in concept study, possible type 26 or Fremm upgrade version. 3 gen should either DCNS FREMM frigate or BOUSTEAD design GOWIND MK2 .it about time to made use of those ToT/IP.2003 1 Gen -kedah class 1600 tons 2013 2 Gen -Gowind class 3000 tons 2023 3 Gen -New AAW Frigate 6000 tons. |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 10:28 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 20 2015, 01:35 AM) 6000tons can very much a destroyer class already well in euro trend now newest frigate already go to 6000 tons level after long experience and study. it more believable that we go for a improved gowind with AAW capabilities armed with sg formidable class weapon the type 26 faced various design delays in fact during gowind tender, the type 26 was not more a concept on paper while the gowind already have a basic design cost ship/hull not much different from 4000 --> 6000 tons, just 5-7% increasing in cost, but improve space for crew, more store for food and ammunition, more weapon can fit, add multi-role mission bay, even quarantine bay most importance, bigger ship have more power for system, for future more and more system, electronic , sensor, radar, weapon requirement huge power. AAW Gowind or SG formidable only suite past and current requirement, but future thread after 2020 is different, also power supply in Gowind is limited. we must have more bigger ambition in navy strength。 remember we in SCS facing bigger thread at Spratly issue. before 2010 spratly issue not that hot. QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Sep 20 2015, 01:42 AM) Yup, and Type 26 is *still* on paper only. And our Gowind has also been compared favourably with the notorious LCS. So I'm quite proud. Only problem is building the things.... sigh. well UK already begin construct first 3 unit Type 26, fund already approval early this year. You think this theoretical AAW Gowind can get Aster? suppliier start make component, and hull section start assembly begin 2017 at shipyard. depend what type radar use in AAW Gowind, some radar support Aster some not. in euro have 2 type radar, 1 is support US weapon/missile, 2 type is support euro weapon and missile. This post has been edited by waja2000: Sep 20 2015, 11:13 AM |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 12:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 20 2015, 10:28 AM) well in euro trend now newest frigate already go to 6000 tons level after long experience and study. Cakap kencang but duit tak adacost ship/hull not much different from 4000 --> 6000 tons, just 5-7% increasing in cost, but improve space for crew, more store for food and ammunition, more weapon can fit, add multi-role mission bay, even quarantine bay most importance, bigger ship have more power for system, for future more and more system, electronic , sensor, radar, weapon requirement huge power. AAW Gowind or SG formidable only suite past and current requirement, but future thread after 2020 is different, also power supply in Gowind is limited. we must have more bigger ambition in navy strength。 remember we in SCS facing bigger thread at Spratly issue. before 2010 spratly issue not that hot. well UK already begin construct first 3 unit Type 26, fund already approval early this year. suppliier start make component, and hull section start assembly begin 2017 at shipyard. depend what type radar use in AAW Gowind, some radar support Aster some not. in euro have 2 type radar, 1 is support US weapon/missile, 2 type is support euro weapon and missile. More economical to just the existing gowind and upgrade it |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 12:24 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 20 2015, 12:04 PM) just boring, fun chat have to wait 5 year later, until that time only know 。。。。 i still thinking/imagination how MY in year 2020 。。。 This post has been edited by waja2000: Sep 20 2015, 12:24 PM |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 12:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 12:36 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
US Navy T-6 trainer crashes near Las Cruces; pilots eject safely
![]() QUOTE CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas (NNS) -- At approximately 10 a.m. MDT Sept. 19, a T-6A Texan II tandem-seat, turboprop trainer, assigned to Training Wing 4, based at Naval Air Station Corpus Christi, Texas, crashed in Las Cruces, New Mexico, after the pilots conducted a controlled ejection during a routine training flight. The two pilots ejected safely and were evaluated for minor injuries. The names of the pilots are being withheld for privacy reasons. The cause of the incident is under investigation. [sos] |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 12:52 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 01:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 01:45 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
189 posts Joined: Aug 2015 From: Cherasboy |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 20 2015, 10:28 AM) well in euro trend now newest frigate already go to 6000 tons level after long experience and study. Frigate sizes AND costs are going up because most navies are trying to fit more capabilities onto lesser hulls as technology improves. The days of using frigates as throwaway ships are over.well UK already begin construct first 3 unit Type 26, fund already approval early this year. suppliier start make component, and hull section start assembly begin 2017 at shipyard. depend what type radar use in AAW Gowind, some radar support Aster some not. in euro have 2 type radar, 1 is support US weapon/missile, 2 type is support euro weapon and missile. Long-lead contracts for Type 26 have just been announced in August and the design is not 100% finalised yet, I am very doubtful they have started any major construction dude. Maybe we can beg for some Type 23 as they are replaced... |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 02:08 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Sep 20 2015, 01:45 PM) Frigate sizes AND costs are going up because most navies are trying to fit more capabilities onto lesser hulls as technology improves. The days of using frigates as throwaway ships are over. That why we need proper frigate。not like Gowind class ... Long-lead contracts for Type 26 have just been announced in August and the design is not 100% finalised yet, I am very doubtful they have started any major construction dude. Maybe we can beg for some Type 23 as they are replaced... for Type 26, beginning 2015 major design already fix, and announce, major component like design weight, proportion, engine,, radar, VLS, missile, already announce too. current warship construction not like last time, it device to multiple section, so company involved this project just do their section, inlcude BAE it self. and BAE only do final assembly all section together at shipyard. untill 2017, hard to see the ship, but went the start assembly, every ship can complete assembly in 6-9 month. This post has been edited by waja2000: Sep 20 2015, 02:12 PM |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 02:22 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
189 posts Joined: Aug 2015 From: Cherasboy |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 20 2015, 02:08 PM) That why we need proper frigate。not like Gowind class ... Chinese say, suit ambition to your appetite. This kind of vessel will certainly cost us multi-billions of ringgit EACH - and for what? Hypothetical battle with China, who is one of our strongest trade partners? Meanwhile no money for helis for Kalimantan border, Thai border, end up begging Brunei for old helis.for Type 26, beginning 2015 major design already fix, and announce, major component already announce too. current warship construction not like last time, it device to multiple section, so company involved this project just do their section, inlcude BAE it self. and BAE only do final assembly all section together at shipyard. untill 2017, hard to see the ship, but went the start assembly, every ship can complete assembly in 6-9 month. Go read up on Type 26 status and building plan. Construction scheduled to start 2016, in service only 2022. The goal is not to build at high speeds but at lower speed to save cost and preserve their shipbuilding industry. |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 02:57 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
Another pic of Sail Tomini 2015 sailing pass with the Indonesian Navy newest LST KRI Teluk Bintuni in front.
![]() Photo by antarafoto. This post has been edited by azriel: Sep 20 2015, 02:57 PM |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 03:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 20 2015, 01:35 AM) 6000tons can very much a destroyer class already De Zeven Provincien and Alvario De Bazan already exceed 6000 ton and both classified as frigate. And SG Formidable class is not that much more advance than the Gowind that we get. I might be mistaken, but i heard that the NSM has a precision strike capability against target on land.it more believable that we go for a improved gowind with AAW capabilities armed with sg formidable class weapon |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 03:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Sep 20 2015, 03:09 PM) De Zeven Provincien and Alvario De Bazan already exceed 6000 ton and both classified as frigate. And SG Formidable class is not that much more advance than the Gowind that we get. I might be mistaken, but i heard that the NSM has a precision strike capability against target on land. Excocet block 3 also got some ground strike capability. Not that uncommon anymoreWe might be seing a multirole missles similarly how we are seeing multi role planes and ships What set the formidable apart it its a ability for area defence on such a small vessel. Previously, it limited to destroyer class only. This is particularly usefully for fleet protection or convoy. What it lack it just it asw and anti surface suite which our gowind is more suited for that role. Therefore, it more a logical steps to armed the next batch of gowind with aster system and area defence capability. |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 03:27 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
189 posts Joined: Aug 2015 From: Cherasboy |
We're nowhere near the Formidable's AAA ability... can't even reach ESSM and Aster 15 level. But I heard the SGs think Gowind's electronics are better so... and while MM.40 is lovely I wish we had Otomat. Oh well.
|
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 04:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 20 2015, 03:18 PM) Excocet block 3 also got some ground strike capability. Not that uncommon anymore Though exocet or even harpoon have land attack capability, It only have an active radar for terminal homing. That leave the task of guiding the missile to a land target to a GPS only. It'll not be a pinpoint strike weapon like a tomahawk.We might be seing a multirole missles similarly how we are seeing multi role planes and ships What set the formidable apart it its a ability for area defence on such a small vessel. Previously, it limited to destroyer class only. This is particularly usefully for fleet protection or convoy. What it lack it just it asw and anti surface suite which our gowind is more suited for that role. Therefore, it more a logical steps to armed the next batch of gowind with aster system and area defence capability. NSM on the other hand use infrared imaging seeker for terminal homing, which mean it's more suited for precision strike. It has also a TERCOM guidance which will allow it to fly between terrain. It'll be like a mini Tomahawk. |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 04:30 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Sep 20 2015, 02:22 PM) Chinese say, suit ambition to your appetite. This kind of vessel will certainly cost us multi-billions of ringgit EACH - and for what? Hypothetical battle with China, who is one of our strongest trade partners? Meanwhile no money for helis for Kalimantan border, Thai border, end up begging Brunei for old helis. seems you mistake, we talk 5 year later not now. Go read up on Type 26 status and building plan. Construction scheduled to start 2016, in service only 2022. The goal is not to build at high speeds but at lower speed to save cost and preserve their shipbuilding industry. well we built suite to as, but need built properly, we built strong navy or defense not relate to China, we have our right to built our warship capability. we have so many thread in sea and border. weak defense power no have foreign diplomatic word. if what you think, what not just cancel Gowind, it also use multi-billions of ringgit, cost for Type 26 different not more than 10% compare to Gowind class. as mil fans you should know what price need to get good weapon and not look much on figure. well i follow news type 26 news every day. seems you not understands, some parts, already start built, 2016 in start built section, 2017-2018 for final hull assembly, and launch, than out outfitting system equipment and parts take 1-2 year, sea try 1 year, about 2022 handover to navy. This post has been edited by waja2000: Sep 20 2015, 05:13 PM |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 04:40 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Sep 20 2015, 03:27 PM) We're nowhere near the Formidable's AAA ability... can't even reach ESSM and Aster 15 level. But I heard the SGs think Gowind's electronics are better so... and while MM.40 is lovely I wish we had Otomat. Oh well. our electronic more newer, but not complete like Formidable have. still hard compare Formidable as AAW frigate + GP frigate, we Gowind as ASW frigate. This post has been edited by waja2000: Sep 20 2015, 05:13 PM |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 04:42 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Sep 20 2015, 04:11 PM) Though exocet or even harpoon have land attack capability, It only have an active radar for terminal homing. That leave the task of guiding the missile to a land target to a GPS only. It'll not be a pinpoint strike weapon like a tomahawk. agree .... plus NSM more small easy to fit at ship.NSM on the other hand use infrared imaging seeker for terminal homing, which mean it's more suited for precision strike. It has also a TERCOM guidance which will allow it to fly between terrain. It'll be like a mini Tomahawk. i waiting NSM-VLS |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0296sec
0.40
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 10:02 AM |