Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V18

views
     
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Sep 19 2015, 08:56 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(patt_sue @ Sep 19 2015, 08:04 PM)
Repelling between PLAN heli and KD Kelantan....

Btw, what type of heli is this? almost similar to heli owned by mmea
user posted image
*
Harbin Z9. A close copy of EC Dauphin.

This post has been edited by MrUbikeledek: Sep 19 2015, 08:56 PM
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Sep 19 2015, 10:33 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 19 2015, 03:38 PM)
ya, K9 heavy too, can't carry by A400M, unless Army no require to carry by A400m,
but surprising SG Primus can make it to 30 tons, maybe material strong is different.
*
Depend on the type of armor and type of gun. K9 use steel armor, while Primus use aluminium armor. Some SPG like PzH 2000 carry a heavier 52 caliber gun instead of usual 39 caliber like most SPH.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Sep 20 2015, 01:24 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


We can buy Galicia class which is within the RMN required tonnage. Or we can get Makassar class which is cheaper.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Sep 20 2015, 03:09 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 20 2015, 01:35 AM)
6000tons can very much a destroyer class already laugh.gif  which is beyond the realm of reality/ imagination

it more believable that we go for a improved gowind with AAW capabilities armed with sg formidable class weapon

*
De Zeven Provincien and Alvario De Bazan already exceed 6000 ton and both classified as frigate. And SG Formidable class is not that much more advance than the Gowind that we get. I might be mistaken, but i heard that the NSM has a precision strike capability against target on land.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Sep 20 2015, 04:11 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 20 2015, 03:18 PM)
Excocet block 3 also got some ground strike capability. Not that uncommon anymore

We might be seing a multirole missles similarly how we are seeing multi role planes and ships

What set the formidable apart it its a ability for area defence on such a small vessel. Previously, it limited to destroyer class only. This is particularly usefully for fleet protection or convoy. What it lack it just it asw and anti surface suite which our gowind is more suited for that role.

Therefore, it more a logical steps to armed the next batch of gowind with aster system and area defence capability.
*
Though exocet or even harpoon have land attack capability, It only have an active radar for terminal homing. That leave the task of guiding the missile to a land target to a GPS only. It'll not be a pinpoint strike weapon like a tomahawk.

NSM on the other hand use infrared imaging seeker for terminal homing, which mean it's more suited for precision strike. It has also a TERCOM guidance which will allow it to fly between terrain. It'll be like a mini Tomahawk.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Sep 23 2015, 04:36 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Sep 23 2015, 11:58 AM)
PLA armored company on routine training exercise ambushed by two 'enemy' attack helicopters, resulting in 80% losses

user posted image

During a recent routine training exercise with the Nanjing military district armored brigades, a few commanders decided to sneak in a surprise element to the exercise: An ambush by two attack helicopters armed with 'anti-tank weapons' on an armored company.

The armored company was reported to have reacted poorly to the surprise helicopter attacks, with conflicting and confusing orders given resulting in reported 80% loss for the armored company. Out of a typical PLA armored company of 14 tanks, this would amount to about 11 or 12 tanks lost to the attack helicopters. The outcome of the botched exercise was claimed to have caused an 'uproar' at Brigade command.

The U.S. Army’s Foreign Military Studies Office took note of the exercise in its monthly journal OE Watch. “It was … apparent that commanders were not staying abreast of recent changes in warfare,” the journal stated.

According to the journal, the 'enemy' ambush was sprung after "When they exploited the victory and staged attacks on “remnant enemies,” two “enemy” helicopter gunships suddenly appeared and fired a number of anti-tank missiles. Facing the abrupt counter-attacks from the opponent, the Fourth Company was knocked off stride and forced into a messy condition. Multiple tanks were hit, releasing red smoke. The battle damage rate of the tanks reached 80 percent."
*
It's no secret actually. Many military "exercise" of many nations were scripted by the field commanders. It's more a theatrical performance rather than a training. This way they can write a favorable performance report to the HQ and avoid reprimand. It also serve as a kinda "show of force" for propaganda purpose. Most countries that aren't under threat of war usually tolerate this practice. The fact that China military done this is worrying though. It mean's they started to take the training seriously. The same thing happen in Egypt before their surprise attack on Israel during 1972 war.

This post has been edited by MrUbikeledek: Sep 23 2015, 04:38 PM
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Sep 23 2015, 06:48 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Sep 23 2015, 06:39 PM)
Why tanks have no windows: 40cm of bulletproof glass smashed by RPG (VIDEO)


user posted image

A Russian amateur video demonstrates what happens to a really thick piece of bulletproof glass when it is hit by a military-grade anti-tank weapon.

The video was produced by Aleksandr Kotlovoy, a Russian TV presenter who has a career working in several science entertainment shows. He and his crew conducted an experiment to see whether 45 layers of bulletproof glass totaling 40 cm would be enough to stop a hit from an RPG-7, a Russian shoulder-fired anti-armor rocket grenade launcher.



The experiment demonstrated the supremacy of the military technology. The hypersonic propulsion, which an RPG produces to pierce through tank armor, was more than capable of penetrating the multilayered glass and “kills” the crash dummy behind it. It even smashed through a second thick panel of glass a couple of meters in front of it in the hope of dispersing and lessening the impact.

The experiment was meant to demonstrate why tanks do not have large bulletproof windows, according to the commentary on the video.

https://www.rt.com/news/316210-rpg-vs-bulletproof-glass/
*
The new kind of transparent ceramic is under development. It'll be just as tough as the ceramic armor used in many armored vehicles.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Sep 24 2015, 05:43 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Sep 24 2015, 01:03 PM)
pandai jugak mamat nih  rclxms.gif

but these indons getting out of hand...
*
At least they alert of the coming and going in their airspace. We don't even detect the MH370 making U-turn.

sarcasm mode off: The plane most likely already informed the TNI of their passage through Indonesian airspace. The intercept was merely to make sure the plane didn't do anything more than flying over. It's also a good training for their pilot.

This post has been edited by MrUbikeledek: Sep 24 2015, 05:47 PM
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Oct 27 2015, 08:49 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


user posted image
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Oct 27 2015, 09:12 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(IReallyNeed Answers @ Oct 27 2015, 09:04 AM)
ini comparison so bias,

the writer must be Dassult employee
*
It was based on a result of testing by Indian Air Force. Not sure bias or not.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Oct 27 2015, 09:36 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Oct 27 2015, 09:26 AM)
it from Switzerland  replacement F5 competition, results for analyst ad test flight by Switzerland pilot.
anyway Switzerland select own country Gripen NG, but cancel due to failed referendum.
*
I think you mistake Switzerland for Sweden.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Oct 27 2015, 04:32 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


Is there a place in Malaysia like this CAD WEST in Wales?

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

SUSMrUbikeledek
post Oct 28 2015, 09:16 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Oct 28 2015, 05:21 AM)

But yes there are stealth fuel drop tanks in existence and the possibility is there for stealth weapon covers.

*
It's called Conformal Fuel Tank. It's not just stealthy, it also incur less drag than drop tank. Example is F-16 below.

user posted image

SUSMrUbikeledek
post Nov 4 2015, 02:04 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Nov 4 2015, 12:37 AM)
Israel Is Already Selling Kamikaze Micro-Drones

user posted image
http://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/dro...-israeli-drone/
*
I've been thinking about this kind of weapon for quite some times. I was thinking about a stealth cruise missile that can loiter for hours on a location until a suitable target enter it's targeting perimeter.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Nov 4 2015, 03:15 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 4 2015, 02:37 PM)
What's the advantage this would have on regular hellfire-armed stealth UAVs?

Also what's the definition of 'suitable target'? Cruise missile are one-way weapons and its targets are usually large stationary structures or follow relatively predictable routes (like ships) which are then pre-identified and the missile is expressly programmed to attack a target that fits that particular target profile (or any secondary targets, just in case).

Cruise missiles loitering to attack a target of opportunity that just happens to pass by , say a terrorist Toyota truck full of armed dudes, that is just ridiculous. The tech that enables an autonomous weapon system to identify its own targets won't be available for a while.

If this weapon is deployed and circling the skies,what happens if no targets turns up? You can't well recover a cruise missile the way you recover a UAV. You still could recall a patrolling UAV to a friendly airstrip when it runs out of fuel. If the fuels starts to run low on this thing with no target appearing,you'll be forced to voluntarily crash or self-destruct the darn thing. Imagine a $ 1.5milllion USD weapon (the cost of a Tomahawk missile) which can't find any targets and you're forced to self destruct it?
*
Armed UAV require some form of logistics chain and many require an airstrip or an aviation ship to launch and recover the UAV. The UAV will require fuel and spare parts which must be be conveyed through the chain. This logistic chain and static launch bases is vulnerable to enemy interdiction effort. . This is not a problem for COIN, but it'll be a vulnerabilities in a conventional war.

Cruise missile on the other hand are almost maintenance free and can be launch from a varieties of mobile platform, like a Submarine for example. Since it's one use weapon, it'll be cheaper than UAV. The loitering capability is useful for interdiction mission. Of course, the decision to attack will be in the hand's of a human operator. When the missile detected potential target, it'll send a signal burst via satellite which contain the visual and sensor information on the target to the command center. Then the human operator will send back a signal to attack the target or not.

Regarding wasting the expensive missile, the same thing can be said about the existing cruise missile. The key here is intelligence. If your intelligence is shaky, then there's a large possibility that the cruise missile will attack a barn instead of a enemy HQ due to faulty intel. A capability to loiter will give a missile a capability to attack secondary target nearby in case the primary target doesn't appear in a allotted time frame.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Nov 6 2015, 08:10 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(Gregyong @ Nov 5 2015, 11:28 PM)
lol, this game predicted so much
user posted image
*
Chinese in the game use Type 59 tank.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Nov 6 2015, 04:22 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(azriel @ Nov 6 2015, 03:01 PM)
What's wrong with their TRIGAT missile?
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Nov 6 2015, 04:42 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


Should we adopt a larger caliber round than the current 5.56x45? Though 5.56x45 is proven to be highly accurate and high penetration, but it lack a knockout power of say, 7.62x39 round of the AK. Against Sulu fighters for example, most of them are high on drugs. There's account from the American officers who fought in Sulu island who saw a Moro warrior high on drug were hit by rifle bullet several times but still came on.

QUOTE
A juramentado at Zamboango, though hit in seven different places by revolver shots, nevertheless reached an American officer and sliced off one of his legs.


So maybe, we should consider switching to 7.65x51. Not now, but in the future when the time come for us to replace the M4A1 we currently use.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Nov 9 2015, 11:17 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Nov 9 2015, 11:11 AM)
US-led coalition disjointed in fighting ISIS as some members have own plan

user posted image
https://www.rt.com/news/321213-maliki-interview-iraq-isis/
*
Later "US fighters shot down Russian aircraft that attack ISIS position", "ISIS fighter captured an Iraqi Patriot PAC-3 from an abandoned Iraqi military base".
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Nov 11 2015, 09:04 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


Anyone here know the unit price of VL MICA? The figure i get is around 1.8 mil, which is higher than the ESSM 1.4 mil. So why Mindef choose MICA over ESSM?

This post has been edited by MrUbikeledek: Nov 11 2015, 09:09 AM

2 Pages  1 2 >
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0628sec    0.85    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 11:22 AM