RM 12k just for the graphic system.

That's the thing I like about the Fury X - the card is cooling so you can put them so close to one another and there won't be any heat issue.

It's short and takes up only 2 PCI-E slots so it fits perfectly.

Try running any other cards red or green camp with this setup, they'll be hot like silly.

I noticed some johor foo like to fake benchmark with tessellation enhancements in another thread and later claim oops i did again like before and most probably all forgive him.

coming soon next month fury x with Ek WB. places an order. Doing a phantek itx build. Waifu approved change of TV..

just waiting for more feedback on that coil whine issue. Thats a no no.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jun 27 2015, 09:37 PM

Not even one stock of 300 series or Fury X at Kota Kinabalu.

Suddenly there's a single Titan X for sale @RM4799 lol. Feels weird why bring it in instead of 980 Ti.

What's this thing about?

mostly on the issue of "Johor foo's" benchmark scores on Unigine Heaven with AMD cards

Should be better than what I attempted.

https://www.facebook.com/goldfries.fanpage/...20373184655863/

Having a terribly difficult time to install the Fury X into my ThermalTake Core V1.

Johor foo's..in which i'm sure is Unseen83.

Come on la,no need to be so rude.

Thats tight. I am looking also at that lianli case mounted on the wall. Or just do ure own with tempered glass. It looks sick.

First thing now is getting the wb. Ek is taking in bookings.
Also hoping for a backplate.




This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jun 27 2015, 11:36 PM

im not fussed, since i dont take the Unigine Heaven scores that serious in the first place

How much? I've been looking around, no price details.

I got it assembled finally and my goodness it's just too much a hassle.

I had to mount the fan outside. I would've mounted the radiator outside but it's designed to be L shaped same direction as the tube connection.

Only option is to have fan placed outside.

The mounting screws provided on the unit (holding the fan to radiator) is not long enough and I had to use the ones from Cooler Master's AIO unit to get it mounted.

Guys - I know who the person is. I ask WHAT is it about, as in the tessellation part and all.

Same here,i do it for the fun,and to beat other people scores for lolz.

in a nutshell,

>cstkl1 is unhappy that johor foo is not displaying real performance scores as per standard
>asks johor foo to rebench
>johor foo doesnt want
>cstkl1 deems it as being untruthful to the scores as AMD doesnt do well in tessellation, with Unigine Heaven very heavy on tessellation

and it goes on until today

saw your fb pic. just wondering, can we actually change the AIO to other brand?
and leave the gpu uncover with the top cover/plate?
since the gpu itself doesn't have any fan running inside.

that CM rad is really a huge piece especially with its top part that stick out some area.

This post has been edited by sai86: Jun 28 2015, 01:22 AM

problem is AMD a bit slow on update.. now is like waiting see if there any improvement on driver update for their flagship.. well amd driver always mature better than it's competitor, but what disappointing Fury X it's oc capability.. come on 1,125Mhz.. i could not get higher without crash benchmark and i have to sign out/in to recover from the mouse point disappear.. x

I think I oredi predict earlier that the thing sure OC like a lame duck

lol brah is it true they accuse you cheating with the heaven benchmark score ?

I don't think you did . So many drama lol just for a damn card , I even accidentally created argument for AA needed at 4k
Which to me is subjective to the eye of beholder , yes there is jaggies if you nitpick but its not that in your face kind .

oh come on still earlier... give AMD some chance! maybe there be a Omega II and not lame duck oki.. it's Fury X Duck!

haha.. look Nvidia have Edge over AMD on Tessellation.. BUT is not consider that as a Cheating/enhancement... but part Nvidia GTX Capability.. but what AMD Gpu have a ability to tweak it's Tessellation... so why not too keep it fair on compete with number.. i don't see it as cheating.. is just Uniegine benchmark top number don't get anything out of it.. but i do apologies if this offended "Elite" i remove it.. and no matter what re-bench i do on the heaven bench not satisfied him.. and from time to time he come back with personal attack.. '

i'm using 4K 60hz.. play game i don't look for jaggies .. just to enjoy gameplay meanwhile Graphic.. eh is just a lovely thing to see not soo focus on jaggies.. i'm four eye my eye already sux to go look for jaggies.. turn AA on 4k, but like you say subjective..

sorry.. that rude fellow been rude to other Lyn,before me.. i remove the bench score.. im32 yo no time to go pity gpu score argument.. with 34 yo elite .. and i'm Kelantan not Johor (where i work) so not fair calling Johor foo.. kinda insult wrong ppl

https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/686356/all

Current OC max is around 100 mhz tops. It's probably a combination of hot spots and clock skew.

A further improvement of the process will probably yield an extra 50 to 75 mHz tops. They'll need to optimize their layout/logic placement and then couple it with a process improvement before it yields anything.

AMD is banking on the fact that developers will catch on to the Fury after programming for next gen consoles with similar GCN architecture. But my bet is that like the R520, improvements won't show till the next gen comes in as programmers take time to react to change and develop better strategies for optimization.