QUOTE(anakkk @ Jun 29 2015, 04:16 PM)
Yup, for the time being Harp Artist's proposal definately has higher chance of success than u-turn before toll, we also don't want to disturb Twin Palms resident too much..Sg Long Property V3
Sg Long Property V3
|
|
Jun 29 2015, 04:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
QUOTE(anakkk @ Jun 29 2015, 04:16 PM) Yup, for the time being Harp Artist's proposal definately has higher chance of success than u-turn before toll, we also don't want to disturb Twin Palms resident too much.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 29 2015, 04:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jun 29 2015, 04:23 PM) Yup, for the time being Harp Artist's proposal definately has higher chance of success than u-turn before toll, we also don't want to disturb Twin Palms resident too much.. Hopefully SILK not greedy and asking double payment if they provide such U-turn in future..This post has been edited by samkps: Jun 29 2015, 04:25 PM |
|
|
Jun 29 2015, 04:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
QUOTE(samkps @ Jun 29 2015, 04:25 PM) They have nothing to lose as those use Twin Palms tunnel only need to pay one way fee all this while. Of course, we need influential politician to exert pressure on Silk.This post has been edited by Palmwalker001: Jun 29 2015, 04:33 PM |
|
|
Jun 29 2015, 04:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jun 29 2015, 04:29 PM) They have nothing to lose as Twin Palms tunnel only need to pay one way fee all this while. Of course, we need influential politician to exert pressure on Silk. Yeah, because I think SILK know that's not convenient (a lot of bumps, turning etc, as being claimed by other forummer).. That's why if the twin palm route can be used, why SILK still need to do extra? As a matter of fact, I presume twin palm has "paid" quite substantial amount to have such tunnel. SILK won't simply allow peoply bypass the toll, they may "request something" if really they allow such U-turn. This post has been edited by samkps: Jun 29 2015, 04:39 PM |
|
|
Jun 29 2015, 04:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
QUOTE(samkps @ Jun 29 2015, 04:36 PM) Yeah, because I think SILK know that's not convenient (a lot of bumps, turning etc, as being claimed by other forummer).. That's why if the twin palm route can be used, why SILK still need to do extra? Yup in Malaysia, advice from an influential figure is more powerful than all facts and figures, I believe u-turn at Silk Kajang toll is under advice by some influential people. As a matter of fact, I presume twin palm has "paid" quite substantial amount to have such tunnel. SILK won't simply allow peoply bypass the toll, they may "request something" if really they allow such U-turn. Anyway, no much extra work required by Silk just some barriers but the increase of cars using the toll will be much more than the cost incurred. This post has been edited by Palmwalker001: Jun 29 2015, 04:52 PM |
|
|
Jun 29 2015, 04:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,119 posts Joined: Apr 2013 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jun 29 2015, 04:50 PM) Yup in Malaysia, advice from an influential figure is more powerful than all facts and figures, I believe u-turn at Silk Kajang toll is under advice by some influential people. haha no secret already, a lot of intervention with all the government project from the "powerful" people too Anyway, no much extra work required by Silk just some barriers but the increase of cars using the toll will be much more than the cost incurred. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 29 2015, 05:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,838 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
|
|
|
Jun 29 2015, 06:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
I think once the access road from Bukit Sungai Long opens to SILK highway it will help to ease the traffic jam in Sg Long. Instead of jamming on the main Sg Long Road every morning, we will see that the road will eases a little bit with some traffic heading towards Persiaran SG Long 2 before ended up on SILK highway. If cars are heading towards Semenyih, then it will be great! They dont have to stuck in the jam anymore!
What about people who wants to go, say for example AEON Cheras Selatan? It will be even better if a U-turn is made available before the SILK Sg Long toll, near twin palms. That SILK Sg Long is wide enough to make U-Turn activities not a dangerous one. |
|
|
Jun 29 2015, 09:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 04:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,459 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: KL |
3:50am: SL7 mains water pressure very very low. Sleep now and see what happens tomorrow.
|
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 09:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
QUOTE(d0j0b @ Jun 29 2015, 06:54 PM) I think once the access road from Bukit Sungai Long opens to SILK highway it will help to ease the traffic jam in Sg Long. Instead of jamming on the main Sg Long Road every morning, we will see that the road will eases a little bit with some traffic heading towards Persiaran SG Long 2 before ended up on SILK highway. If cars are heading towards Semenyih, then it will be great! They dont have to stuck in the jam anymore! Safety is only an excuse by LLM, they want to protect the interest of highway operator, by allowing u-turn before toll will affect the bottom line of Silk.What about people who wants to go, say for example AEON Cheras Selatan? It will be even better if a U-turn is made available before the SILK Sg Long toll, near twin palms. That SILK Sg Long is wide enough to make U-Turn activities not a dangerous one. |
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 10:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
Understand from China Press that :
There is no discussion at all for both Parliament or State level on how to improve traffic jam and of course no budget for Sg Long/BMC ! MP/Adun should submit the proposal to improve traffic system via Parliament or State, if LLM refuse to co-operate condemn them through resolutions in Parliament or State Assembly Hall. 他翻查國州議會的開會紀錄,發現國州議員上任以來,不曾在會議上討論皇冠城和雙溪龍的交通問題,令人難以置信。 他認為,國州議員應通過國州或市議會,正式提呈改善交通系統的建議或方案,如大道局不合作,國州議員應通過國州議會施壓,譴責工程部和大道局。 http://www.chinapress.com.my/node/633831 Traffic is really bad for BMC, shame on those lazy MP & ADUN. This post has been edited by Palmwalker001: Jun 30 2015, 10:53 AM |
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 10:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
907 posts Joined: Apr 2013 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jun 30 2015, 10:41 AM) Understand from China Press that : both from green moon There is no discussion at all for both Parliament or State level on how to improve traffic jam and of course no budget for Sg Long/BMC ! MP/Adun should submit the proposal to improve traffic system via Parliament or State, if LLM refuse to co-operate condemn them through resolutions in Parliament or State Assembly Hall. 他翻查國州議會的開會紀錄,發現國州議員上任以來,不曾在會議上討論皇冠城和雙溪龍的交通問題,令人難以置信。 他認為,國州議員應通過國州或市議會,正式提呈改善交通系統的建議或方案,如大道局不合作,國州議員應通過國州議會施壓,譴責工程部和大道局。 http://www.chinapress.com.my/node/633831 Traffic is really bad for BMC, shame on those lazy MP & ADUN. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 11:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
|
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 11:32 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
907 posts Joined: Apr 2013 |
|
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 11:38 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 11:45 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,234 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
|
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 01:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
556 posts Joined: May 2015 |
Taming Indah 2 already Vped two weeks ago. Agents offer "guarantee" RM6000 rental per month to owner to rent out to UTAR students.
There are total 5+1 rooms for each house. 4 big rooms upstream can fit 3 people, guest room can fix 2 people and utility room 1 people. Average rental could be RM400 or more. |
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 01:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
556 posts Joined: May 2015 |
QUOTE(HarpArtist @ Jun 29 2015, 02:02 PM) boss any idea what price kh going to launch? 3 storey semid right? anyway happy that im not going to need to go thru the sg long jam when going home in a few mths... or when going out to work in the mornings as i go putrajaya direction. hopefully become a little more liveable after that as now i really feel the pain of being too far from kl/pj. Probably more than 2 mil based on recent launched. Reference to Vista Cheras |
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 01:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0307sec
0.54
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 01:53 AM |