Sg Long Property V3
Sg Long Property V3
|
|
Jun 22 2015, 10:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
They should allow U-turning at the Sungai Long toll so that people from Sungai long and BMC dont have to pay RM1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 22 2015, 11:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
But how come they allow a U-Turn near the Bukit Kajang toll, opposite Mewah 9 Residence?
Can the same model be applied at the Sg Long toll? If not why leh? |
|
|
Jun 23 2015, 07:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jun 23 2015, 04:28 PM) BMC Quarry issues - Titik Sentuhan WOW! I am shock seeing such a big quarry! TV1 22 May 2015 https://www.facebook.com/MahkotaCherasCommu...?type=2&theater What action/decision by Selangor State Government? anyone can highlight. |
|
|
Jun 28 2015, 11:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
Just now makan near UTAR also the kedai owner says water supply has been cut for the past 5 days.
|
|
|
Jun 28 2015, 07:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
|
|
|
Jun 28 2015, 07:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
Hi guys,
Regarding the new route to access to SILK Highway from Bukit Sg Long (BSL), is it one way or two ways? One way, meaning from BSL to Silk Highway heading towards Twin Palms and future Sutera Pines. Or Two ways, meaning apart from the abovementioned one way access, it also includes the access to SILK highway heading towards AEON Cheras Balakong? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2015, 07:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
QUOTE(samkps @ Jun 28 2015, 07:09 PM) Thanks for the confirmation Samkps. It is still cumbersome for the Sungai Long and BMC residence to go AEON using the SILK highway. A U-Turn near the toll will solve the issues. Sigh. |
|
|
Jun 29 2015, 09:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
QUOTE(HarpArtist @ Jun 28 2015, 11:09 PM) Yeah, I agree. It should be a simple u-turn just before the Sg Long toll just like a simple U-turn made available in front of the Mewah 9 Residence at Bukit Kajang SILK toll. How come SILK allows this to happen at the Bukit Kajang SILK Toll and not at SG Long SILK toll? |
|
|
Jun 29 2015, 06:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
I think once the access road from Bukit Sungai Long opens to SILK highway it will help to ease the traffic jam in Sg Long. Instead of jamming on the main Sg Long Road every morning, we will see that the road will eases a little bit with some traffic heading towards Persiaran SG Long 2 before ended up on SILK highway. If cars are heading towards Semenyih, then it will be great! They dont have to stuck in the jam anymore!
What about people who wants to go, say for example AEON Cheras Selatan? It will be even better if a U-turn is made available before the SILK Sg Long toll, near twin palms. That SILK Sg Long is wide enough to make U-Turn activities not a dangerous one. |
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 05:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jun 30 2015, 09:14 AM) Safety is only an excuse by LLM, they want to protect the interest of highway operator, by allowing u-turn before toll will affect the bottom line of Silk. Yalor. I agree. If LLM protects the interests of the SILK highway operator, then who is going to protect the interests of the people. SILK is MILKing our BMCian and Sg Longan money |
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 10:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
QUOTE(greenmoon @ Jun 30 2015, 07:28 PM) No leh. If you read their financial report on their website at http://www.silk.my/AnnualReport/SilkHoldings2014.pdf , especially on page 36, it clearly shows that their profit for the year 2014 after minus income tax expense is RM 41,212,000. In 2013, they made a profit of 35,245,000. |
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 10:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
I just found out that SILK Holdings BHD disposed 100% equity of the SILK highway to IJM.
Source: http://www.thesundaily.my/news/1089567 |
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 10:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 1 2015, 06:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jul 1 2015, 09:02 AM) Based on the latest quarterly result attached for quarter ended 30/4/2015, the highway division make a loss of RM2m but still much more better than loss of RM9m for quarter ended 30/4/2014. One of the reasons for loss was high finance cost, almost one third of group revenue used to service the borrowing. Understand that this borrowing mainly for the construction of Silk Highway. Nevertheless, their revenue increased tremendously from RM22m in QE 30/4/14 to RM41m in QE30/4/15 that means more and more people used their road. |
|
|
Jul 1 2015, 06:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
QUOTE(samkps @ Jul 1 2015, 06:14 PM) hehehe, depend "how smart" SILK could be.. I think the initial intention to build the Twin palm tunnel is meant for Twin Palmians usage, but eventually it is open to everyone to use for U-turn purposes. So everyone needs to pay RM1 to use the tunnel to U-turn to SILK highway. By the way, if SILK allow a U-turn after the toll, wondering why Twin Palm want to build a tunnel instead? Just make 2 U-turns, one before and one after already can serve the purpose, rather spending huge amount of money for digging the tunnel... |
|
|
Jul 1 2015, 08:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
By the way is there a reason why this place is called Sungai Long?
When I first time came across this name, I found it abit funny lor. How come got Malay campur English? Haha Why call Sungai Long not Sungai Panjang? Haha |
|
|
Jul 2 2015, 04:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jul 2 2015, 08:46 AM) Based on a report in Guang Ming Daily on 21/10/2011, Thanks for the link Sungai Long names after a officer in charge of the estate at colonial time. ..雙溪龍最初確是一條河的名稱。她是英殖民時代一位負責看管園坵的洋人官員以本身的名字Long所命名的河流。 高爾夫球場紅磚屋爭艷‧雙溪龍歐味濃郁 http://www.guangming.com.my/node/116502?tid=9 but at least now I know the origins of the name lor |
|
|
Jul 2 2015, 04:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
|
|
|
Jul 2 2015, 04:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
|
|
|
Jul 2 2015, 05:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jun 2015 |
QUOTE(samkps @ Jul 2 2015, 05:16 PM) Lol... At least for tropicana height project, they willing to dump in such investment... They should approve lar. Why double standard when it comes to Sg Long toll? Kesian Sg Long people lor until Ki Huat tak boleh tahan and build a branch road to SILK. I will be really surprise if the u-turn application is approved.. But i do hope that can happen, pity to all the sungai long folks who always stuck in jam during rush period.. Itu Bukit Kajang Toll ada U-turn leh. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0449sec
1.08
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 02:16 AM |