My rebuttal with you from day 1 until now about this is not to make you feel bad or to put you down.
We know you have difficulty in expressing in English and we know not everyone understands Bible context.

Just hope you'll be opened to learn and be humble, that's all.

Bro I also hear God's voice,  I'm sure so does Pehkay even Sophiera, Luffy, Steve n rest of friends. We are all friends here.
I believe all of us here trying to help you. But you are stubborn.

We are trying to tell you God will never lead or approve anyone to act in sin to accomplish whatever means. God is Holy.
The entire Christian world is united in this. We believe it's highly possible you're just hearing your own Conscience and not God.

You know ... that the ritual laws were abolished but the moral laws are uplifted ....

Your pt. 3 is very very shaky

First, thanks for understanding me and have a heart to lead me to righteous living per christian value standard.

People with mindset like me, it's not only me bro .. ... There a a lot of Christian like me in indonesia. But they are not posting in lowyat for sure. Most of them they are business man, some do the ministry behind the screen.

If you ask them can bribe ? they will answer no. especially for pulpit ministry it's a BIG NO.

some thing can be shared in pulpit, some only in secret, perhaps only from 1-to-1 session only.

Here i share with you some truth, that maybe somebody can benefit. for somebody maybe an insult.

Lead to sin ? because our (meaning me and ppl that has same mindset) definition of sin is not bribe / bribe, but hamartia. Missing marks. Missing from GOD's assignment, missing from our to-do list in response to what HS has advised us.

few verses to justify:
1. Jesus come not to abolish the law, but to complete it. Meaning, the law it's not what, but who.
2. everything is permissible... becareful, what you reap is what you sow
3. Jesus broke the sabattical law because HE is the LORD of the law. For those who wanna break "the law", ask JESUS permission first.
4. There is higher cause to reason something, as it is written in the bible, there is highest law, the law that covers everything. Love you GOD (with a,b,c,d..) and Love your neighbour (with a,b,c,d).

Can bible reply ? cannot right ... only GOD can answer prayer. Only HS can advise

Bible is the highest authorithy ? isn't that everything is permissible also biblical ? or you want to remove everything is permissible from bible ?

moral law is good to keep society in order.

But if the moral law starts to prohibits GOD's kingdom expansion... e.g. saving the child unless bribing the officers... uhm... depends on HS lah... if HS stay quiet... i oso stay quiet ...

I am not gonna do "dirty jobs" unless really...really...really...really...really... necessary and without HS approvals, forget it.

I think in this world of political correctness "colouring" our eyes, we then to bring this to the Bible too

The term used by the Lord, "woman" is a term of respect and endearment.

The other reference is in John 19:26: "Woman, behold your son!"

According to A Manual Greek Lexicon of the New Testament by G. Abbott-Smith, using the word woman to refer to a female was "a term of respect and endearment." Bullinger's Companion Bible notation for verse 26 refers the reader to John 2:4 where Jesus also uses the term "woman." In the notes pertaining to this verse, "woman" is "a respectful form of address."

Adam Clarke's Commentary on the Bible for this verse makes an interesting comment as to WHY Jesus might have used the term "woman." It states he did so to possibly spare his mother's feelings, as the very mention of her name (given her firstborn son was being brutally killed though he was innocent) would have wrung more sorrow out of her heart.

Regarding the latter part of the sentence, Mary, the mother of Jesus, here signifies the natural man, which has nothing to do with life and which must be subdued by the divine life (vv. 3-5). When the wine was exhausted, the natural man came out and even prayed to the Lord. When Mary told the Lord, “They have no wine,” He said to her, “Woman, what have I to do with you? My hour has not yet come” (vv. 3-4). Often we are exactly like the mother of Jesus. We are today’s Mary, praying as a natural man according to our natural life.

Frequently the Lord will allow the wine in certain situations to run out in order that He might have an opportunity to change death into life. Even in a local church, the Lord may allow the situation to go into death. In such a case, the natural man will pray, “O Lord, do something to rescue the situation.” If you pray in this way, the Lord will turn to you and say, “What have I to do with you? You have nothing to do with Me in this matter.” Nearly all of us would act the same way Mary did. What then should we do? We should not do anything. Let the death come to the surface and be exposed. Then the Lord Jesus will come in.
------------------------

But then, to be fair, the Lord was genuine and frank ... and he tend to be very direct with Nicodemus, a senior respected man of the Jews.

Being graceful towards elders is wisdom even though you may know something they don't.  God takes pleasure in such humility.

Oh that verse? It's a matter of choice. What I mean is this.

The day you decided in your heart and mind that the lust of the flesh is wrong and you want no part of it anymore and you made that request in prayer to God, this verse will come true.
I believe it's activated upon such determination. The way of escape and enduring will be there in your spirit. I can testify from my experience. The desire to continue or wanting to succumb to it, is simply not there.

But if you still have doubts or reservation whether you want to give up on lust, this way of escape is kinda elusive. 

First, thanks for understanding me and have a heart to lead me to righteous living per christian value standard.

People with mindset like me, it's not only me bro .. ... There a a lot of Christian like me in indonesia. But they are not posting in lowyat for sure. Most of them they are business man, some do the ministry behind the screen.

If you ask them can bribe ? they will answer no. especially for pulpit ministry it's a BIG NO.

some thing can be shared in pulpit, some only in secret, perhaps only from 1-to-1 session only.

Here i share with you some truth, that maybe somebody can benefit. for somebody maybe an insult.

Lead to sin ? because our (meaning me and ppl that has same mindset) definition of sin is not bribe / bribe, but hamartia. Missing marks. Missing from GOD's assignment, missing from our to-do list in response to what HS has advised us.

few verses to justify:
1. Jesus come not to abolish the law, but to complete it. Meaning, the law it's not what, but who.
2. everything is permissible... becareful, what you reap is what you sow
3. Jesus broke the sabattical law because HE is the LORD of the law. For those who wanna break "the law", ask JESUS permission first.
4. There is higher cause to reason something, as it is written in the bible, there is highest law, the law that covers everything. Love you GOD (with a,b,c,d..) and Love your neighbour (with a,b,c,d).

Can bible reply ? cannot right ... only GOD can answer prayer. Only HS can advise

Bible is the highest authorithy ? isn't that everything is permissible also biblical ? or you want to remove everything is permissible from bible ?

tinarhian Regarding the temptation subject, you can refer to this scripture:

Jesus the Great High Priest

14 Therefore, since we have a great high priest who has ascended into heaven,[a] Jesus the Son of God, let us hold firmly to the faith we profess. 15 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to empathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are—yet he did not sin. 16 Let us then approach God’s throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need.

All the best in your family business. Bro u still doing other business as per your siggy?

Bro Read carefully how it says it;
1 Corinthians 6:12 (NLT) - You say, "I am allowed to do anything"--but not everything is good for you. And even though "I am allowed to do anything," I must not become a slave to anything.

Here's in your mother tongue version

(12) Segala sesuatu halal bagiku, tetapi bukan semuanya berguna. Segala sesuatu halal bagiku, tetapi aku tidak membiarkan diriku diperhamba oleh suatu apapun.
1 Corinthians 10:23-24 (NLT) - You say, "I am allowed to do anything"--but not everything is good for you. You say, "I am allowed to do anything"--but not everything is beneficial. Don't be concerned for your own good but for the good of others.

Here's in your mother tongue version

(23) Kata orang, "Kita boleh berbuat apa saja yang kita mau." Benar! Tetapi tidak semua yang kita mau itu berguna. "Kita boleh berbuat apa saja yang kita mau" --tetapi tidak semua yang kita mau itu membangun kehidupan kita. (24) Janganlah seorang pun berjuang untuk kepentingan dirinya sendiri saja. Setiap orang harus berjuang untuk kepentingan orang lain.
Do you now see the truth of it's context. Di Bahagian dimana di perkatakan "Tetapi" merujuk kepada apa yang patut kamu elak-kan.

Same meaning in principal here.

1 Corinthians 15:27 - For he "has put everything under his feet." Now when it says that "everything" has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ.

Here's in your mother tongue version

(27) Dalam Alkitab tertulis begini, "Allah sudah membuat segala sesuatu takluk kepada-Nya." Jelaslah bahwa yang dimaksud dengan "segala sesuatu" itu tidak termasuk Allah sendiri, yang membuat segala sesuatu itu takluk kepada Kristus.
You cannot say "everything" means including even what is sinful, as explained in 1 Corinthians 6:12 & 10:23-24 as how the principal in 1 Corinthians 15:27.

Expansion of God's kingdom requires the breaking of moral law .... this is really pushing it bro ... There is no such thing leh. 

1 John 1:6 “If we say that we have fellowship with Him and walk in the darkness, we lie and are not practicing the truth.”

John says it so clearly .... and he is considered one who ABIDE in the Lord and walking according to the Anointing.

That's true

but that's not the highest law right ?

PS:
expansion of GOD's kingdom is not the highest law
moral law is not the highest law
breaking moral law is not te highest law
fellowship is not the highest law
lie is not the highest law
practicing the truth is not the highest law
considered is not the highest law
John Says is not the highest law

shall i explain the highest law ?

And how does loving God with our whole mind, strength, etc ... cause us to grieve Him?

And how does loving our neighbour constitutes doing something negative to others?

Actually, the point of my question was ... when does following the Spirit results in unrighteousness?

You think it will cause grieve because you don't get HS replies. Meaning, if HS reply ok then ok it is. if HS reply not ok then not ok it is.

loving our neighbour vs doing something negative to others... well GOD's will first isn't it ? again martin luther (with bible verse in rome like you say) didn't ask for approval for others, and sure marthin luther hurts some of his catholic frens (i assume he is not a lonely guy ok ) ... sure his catholic frens think he's a stumbling block.. well i was a protestant and i respect what martin luther did

unrighteousness ? your definition of HS definition ?

this verses are the essence of Christian freedom to expand GOD's kingdom actually ...

The empowerment of daily live and ministry it's coming from HS, therefore these verses are supposed to help believers

The devil is using anything necessary, including moral law to limit how everything had been redefined to "everything but not sin" and not sin is defined by moral law.

Fortunately, it's not moral law that empower daily live and ministry. It's HS.

Therefore if not necessary, i don't break moral law unless my HS gave approval first, e.g. to bribe to save the kid in africa.

----

1 Corinthians 6:12. I must not become a slave... how about a slave of Christ ? i assumed still slave of Christ right ? 1 cor 7:22 ... therefore if HS instruct, based on these verses that you wrote... obey lahh... save the kid in africa at all cost. it's lucky nobody shed bloods, only bribing.

1 Corinthians 10:23-24 .. not everything good. bribing it's not good. But it's not condoned if HS approved to bribe to save the kid in Africa

1 Cor 15:27... everything is everything lah bro... including moral law, of course excluding GOD. Actually everything here is powerful. When Babylonian / persian king ruled in old testament. everything king say is the law... yes there is seal / chop for whatever written but essentially when GOD allow them to rule during OT... everything is literally everything.
Now bible say everything under Christ feet.... hmmm.... are you sure everything is not including bribing ?

----

At the end, it's empowerment that counts, not moral law, not "sin or not sin as of moral law view"...
What count ? to break the moral law, to bribe to save children in africa... i need empowerment from HS... or else i assumed it's not my responsibility. Play safe lahh...

well... whatever HS decided GOD is always righteous (ah.. this is pehkay term).

Yalar ... my question still stands ...

What is your definition of righteousness then? ..... I don't understand why is it my definition since it is in the Bible.

If HS replied ... how does the HS ok with unrighteousness or sinful things? There is no such things. The HS will still be with you when you fails. But it does not mean that HS AGREED with you. To allow permissively is not "one with you"

So, now Martin Luther's standing for the truth is immoral ?  You really serious? How does standing for the truth equates on the same level as stealing or murdering ??!!!

He didn't stand for the "teaching of indulgences for the forgiveness of sin" which was really immoral

He is immoral for fighting against immoral practices 

You sure??

To love your neighbour is not to seek others' approval lor.