Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

235 Pages « < 181 182 183 184 185 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Streamyx Streamyx 4Mbps Club V6

views
     
NightFelix
post Mar 21 2017, 10:42 AM

Samsung Exynos
********
All Stars
17,467 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Lazada



is it really bad for having private IP? Google can answer my question.
alicia-l
post Mar 21 2017, 05:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
145 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(JohnLai @ Mar 21 2017, 01:27 AM)
The good news = yes, you can request for public IPv4. Only need to mention the reason for it. Eg: remote CCTV access, baby monitor, security system etc.
*
But after I make a complain about my speed and ask them is it change to private IP they told me no such thing. So how to request to change.
JohnLai
post Mar 21 2017, 08:58 PM

Skeptical Cat
*******
Senior Member
3,669 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
QUOTE(alicia-l @ Mar 21 2017, 05:36 PM)
But after I make a complain about my speed and ask them is it change to private IP they told me no such thing. So how to request to change.
*
Better use TM LiveChat. Don't complain about speed. Just complain on why you can't access your CCTV remotely.

Some support agents on duty have no idea about these stuffs.

Screenshot your assigned IP address at router/modem configuration page. Upload to TM Live Chat.
Ask TM Live Chat on why your modem/router is assigned with private IP instead of public IPv4 address.
JohnLai
post Mar 22 2017, 05:53 PM

Skeptical Cat
*******
Senior Member
3,669 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
QUOTE(alicia-l @ Mar 20 2017, 01:02 PM)
OIC tq for ur advice
*
Okay, so here is my follow up on live chat + technician coming over and informing them about dsl noise profile that can only be changed on TM side stuff few days ago.
Oh ya, I create the report on monday 20/3/2017 and it was changed just now 22/3/2017.

Before (Interleaving mode)
user posted image

CODE
Pinging 202.188.1.5 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 202.188.1.5:
   Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
   Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = 78ms, Average = 58ms


Today (Fastpath mode)
user posted image

CODE
Pinging 202.188.1.5 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 202.188.1.5:
   Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
   Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 38ms, Average = 37ms


thumbsup.gif for Miri City TM technicians.

Edit: Note that I don't get charged...okay....
Edit2: Replacing pictures with PNG version because lowyat JPEG compressor quality is disappointing....

This post has been edited by JohnLai: Mar 22 2017, 06:13 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image Attached Image
Hummingbird
post Mar 22 2017, 05:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,007 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


QUOTE(Mubarak90 @ Mar 16 2017, 11:35 AM)
4mbps Streamyx is not that bad. Already can stream Youtube at 720p.
*
That is given that there is only one user is using the connection at a time. Tell us how to do iCloud backup, Facebook live, video upload with that upload speed, even if there is nobody else is contending the connection with you?
celciuz
post Mar 22 2017, 10:33 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(JohnLai @ Mar 22 2017, 05:53 PM)
Okay, so here is my follow up on live chat + technician coming over and informing them about dsl noise profile that can only be changed on TM side stuff few days ago.
Oh ya, I create the report on monday 20/3/2017 and it was changed just now 22/3/2017.

Before (Interleaving mode)
user posted image

CODE
Pinging 202.188.1.5 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 202.188.1.5:
   Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
   Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = 78ms, Average = 58ms


Today (Fastpath mode)
user posted image

CODE
Pinging 202.188.1.5 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=58
Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 202.188.1.5:
   Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
   Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 38ms, Average = 37ms


thumbsup.gif  for Miri City TM technicians.

Edit: Note that I don't get charged...okay....
Edit2: Replacing pictures with PNG version because lowyat JPEG compressor quality is disappointing....
*
Seems like if I go from Interleave to Fastpath, it can give me better pings? Question, how do I check which am I on?
rhytion
post Mar 22 2017, 10:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
389 posts

Joined: Oct 2016
From: Kota Kinabalu


Upstream Downstream
Current Rate (Kbps) 637 10237
Max Rate (Kbps) 1140 26680
SNR Margin (dB) 25.3 22.8
Line Attenuation (dB) 6.4 6.5
Errors (Pkts) 0 0

Are these stats good enough to request the change to Fast Path?
JohnLai
post Mar 22 2017, 11:23 PM

Skeptical Cat
*******
Senior Member
3,669 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 22 2017, 10:33 PM)
Seems like if I go from Interleave to Fastpath, it can give me better pings? Question, how do I check which am I on?
*
Login into the modem/router and check the adsl stats.
Dlink, asus and tplink display "Interleave Depth" value for both upstream and downstream.
In my case, it was 64 depth downstream and 8 depth upstream
If you use TM supplied innacomm, then you out of luck.
Notice how much delay/latency interleaving by taking a look at "Delay (msec)"
When my adsl line was in Interleave mode, the "Delay (msec)" were 7.85ms for downstream and 7.91ms for upstream.

Once it is changed to fastpath, Interleave Depth is 1 for both upstream and downstream (depth of 1 means fastpath). The Delay (msec) for both downstream and upstream become 0.25ms and 0.24ms respectively.

Some people is unlucky, for example, the forummer HolySatan here:
user posted image
Source: https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...post&p=84153387
His "Delay (msec)" is....... doh.gif 15ms for both downstream and upstream. Total up 30ms latency. His adsl noise profile probably is configured at maximum stability mode.


QUOTE(rhytion @ Mar 22 2017, 10:45 PM)
Upstream Downstream
Current Rate (Kbps) 637 10237
Max Rate (Kbps) 1140 26680
SNR Margin (dB) 25.3 22.8
Line Attenuation (dB) 6.4 6.5
Errors (Pkts) 0 0

Are these stats good enough to request the change to Fast Path?
*
25.3 with 6.4?
22.8 with 6.5?
Yes, stable enough.


EDIT: Anyone with SNR (upstream and downstream) lower than 25, don't bother changing to fastpath. Otherwise, the dsl line will be forced to retrain randomly due to error/noise/low signal (layman term, dsl light will be unstable) or there will be a lot of packet loss.

This post has been edited by JohnLai: Mar 22 2017, 11:30 PM
celciuz
post Mar 22 2017, 11:33 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Oh dear, I'm on interleaved mode sad.gif 64 and 8... so that's why I'm getting high pings for my online game!

Well, with my ADSL stats I should be able to request for fastpath?

Attached Image
JohnLai
post Mar 22 2017, 11:55 PM

Skeptical Cat
*******
Senior Member
3,669 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 22 2017, 11:33 PM)
Oh dear, I'm on interleaved mode sad.gif 64 and 8... so that's why I'm getting high pings for my online game!

Well, with my ADSL stats I should be able to request for fastpath?

Attached Image
*
Only 1.4db attenuation for upstream?
Sure, no problem. Upstream SNR 23.4 should be fine since the attenuation is quite low. If your attenuation is more than 10, then better don't change. Luckily it is only 1.4db. Must be new copper wire........

But seriously......you better hope the technician at your local DSLAM exchange know how to change it.

Changing "interleave" to "fastpath" can only be done on TM side, not user side.
No need to ask TM technician to come over. (TM charges RM50+ for each visit, in my case though, TM technicians came over and I explained to them about dsl interleaving,fastpath, and depth value plus how those things have impact on latency, when fastpath or interleave should be used and how it can be only changed by TM since TM doesn't expose such setting to user unlike Australia Telstra ISP. I showed them Australia Telstra website too. I don't get charged for the visit. laugh.gif They said they will refer to their senior and voila, mine got changed to fastpath the next day rclxm9.gif )

This post has been edited by JohnLai: Mar 22 2017, 11:56 PM
celciuz
post Mar 23 2017, 12:01 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(JohnLai @ Mar 22 2017, 11:55 PM)
Only 1.4db attenuation for upstream?
Sure, no problem. Upstream SNR 23.4 should be fine since the attenuation is quite low. If your attenuation is more than 10, then better don't change. Luckily it is only 1.4db. Must be new copper wire........

But seriously......you better hope the technician at your local DSLAM exchange know how to change it.

Changing "interleave" to "fastpath" can only be done on TM side, not user side.
No need to ask TM technician to come over. (TM charges RM50+ for each visit, in my case though, TM technicians came over and I explained to them about dsl interleaving,fastpath, and depth value plus how those things have impact on latency, when fastpath or interleave should be used and how it can be only changed by TM since TM doesn't expose such setting to user unlike Australia Telstra ISP. I showed them Australia Telstra website too. I don't get charged for the visit. laugh.gif  They said they will refer to their senior and voila, mine got changed to fastpath the next day  rclxm9.gif )
*
About 4-5 years ago pulled the cable to my home for the coolunipack thingy... that's the cable you referring to? But I think the DSLAM is pretty close to me actually.

Hmm, think I gotta make it known to them about this then... get them to refer to their senior haha!
TSblacktubi
post Mar 23 2017, 12:38 AM

-
Group Icon
Elite
8,418 posts

Joined: Jul 2008

JohnLai That's some really competent technician you have over there! Pretty significant improvement on latency as well. Do report back if you face any issues.

Anyway, my 8Mbps Streamyx is on interleaved mode. I realize cable quality is really important. I lay my own telephone cable and I use a decent splitter. I use the cheapest TP-LINK modem so I couldn't check the depth.

SNR Margin : 24.7 18.1 db Line Attenuation : 7.7 4.4 db

user posted image
JohnLai
post Mar 23 2017, 01:24 AM

Skeptical Cat
*******
Senior Member
3,669 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
QUOTE(blacktubi @ Mar 23 2017, 12:38 AM)
JohnLai That's some really competent technician you have over there! Pretty significant improvement on latency as well. Do report back if you face any issues.

Anyway, my 8Mbps Streamyx is on interleaved mode. I realize cable quality is really important. I lay my own telephone cable and I use a decent splitter. I use the cheapest TP-LINK modem so I couldn't check the depth.

SNR Margin : 24.7 18.1 db Line Attenuation : 7.7 4.4 db

user posted image
*
So far, so good,even my parent also said their internet browsing (through wifi) is quite responsive than usual today.
Except the part where my area IPv6 connectivity still borked since October 2016......... cry.gif
Not really a problem as I can use HE tunnel to access IPv6 only websites. hmm.gif
The bad news, I might not be using dsl for long. Currently awaiting call from unifi installer. Installer may call me for installation between April to June. sweat.gif

True, copper cable quality is important. But with your current upstream SNR......don't take the risk of changing to fastpath.

EDIT: wah, even with interleaving, your 22ms ping is quite good. I guess 38ms is quite reasonable for my location in Sarawak.

This post has been edited by JohnLai: Mar 23 2017, 01:25 AM
TSblacktubi
post Mar 23 2017, 10:11 AM

-
Group Icon
Elite
8,418 posts

Joined: Jul 2008

QUOTE(JohnLai @ Mar 23 2017, 01:24 AM)
So far, so good,even my parent also said their internet browsing (through wifi) is quite responsive than usual today.
Except the part where my area IPv6 connectivity still borked since October 2016......... cry.gif
Not really a problem as I can use HE tunnel to access IPv6 only websites. hmm.gif
The bad news, I might not be using dsl for long. Currently awaiting call from unifi installer. Installer may call me for installation between April to June. sweat.gif

True, copper cable quality is important. But with your current upstream SNR......don't take the risk of changing to fastpath.

EDIT: wah, even with interleaving, your 22ms ping is quite good. I guess 38ms is quite reasonable for my location in Sarawak.
*
I just disable IPV6 entirely. No incentive for me to use that for now.

I wouldn't bother changing, wouldn't fix what's not broken.

todxtatsuya
post Mar 23 2017, 02:21 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
From: Semenyih


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Hi. Do you mind sharing what type of cable and splitter you use? I want to improve my streamyx line. Thanks
momuchi
post Mar 23 2017, 03:06 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,065 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Born in Kedah, Now @Putrajaya



QUOTE(JohnLai @ Mar 21 2017, 12:33 AM)
I had been saying 4Mbps users will be allocated with private IP since last year.
Before this, only 384kbps, 512,1mbps and 2mbps users got 'unlucky'.

Here another news, seem like 8Mbps will hit the shit too IF UNIFI uptake keep increasing.
*
mine already change to private IP last saturday.. call TM to change back to public.. they just ignored it.. bangwall.gif
celciuz
post Mar 23 2017, 03:30 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Sigh, contacted live chat and requested to change from interleaved to fast path saying to reduce ping to online game but now they requesting for ping plotter ._.

What reason did you guys give for changing the dsl noise profile?
JohnLai
post Mar 23 2017, 04:17 PM

Skeptical Cat
*******
Senior Member
3,669 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
QUOTE(momuchi @ Mar 23 2017, 03:06 PM)
mine already change to private IP last saturday.. call TM to change back to public.. they just ignored it.. bangwall.gif
*
I got mine changed back to public IP.

QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 23 2017, 03:30 PM)
Sigh, contacted live chat and requested to change from interleaved to fast path saying to reduce ping to online game but now they requesting for ping plotter ._.

What reason did you guys give for changing the dsl noise profile?
*
Oh ya, livechat agent also requested ping plotter result from me.
I simply provided her/him with the result and clarify that the ping can be lowered further if adsl noise profile is set to fastpath. I also wrote the interleave depth is adding 25ms plus 5ms extra ping time. So, from the pingplotter result, there is total 30ms extra latency which is caused by dsl interleaving which is simply unacceptable for online gaming. I provided them the source for the info http://www.kitz.co.uk/adsl/interleaving.htm and http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/c...e-config31.html , at the bottom graph, had* the livechat agent took a look at 'burst protection' latency values because TM dsl line has it activated. In worst case scenario, interleaving can increase latency up to 47ms for depth value of 64 with INP value of 2.

You can check my interleaved dsl stats screenshot where my INP were 2.64 and 2.63 for downstream and upstream. In fastpath, INP is disabled.

EDIT: Some stuff for reading....how INP and interleave depth affect each other......fair use.....two pages only. Sourced from google book?
user posted image
user posted image



This post has been edited by JohnLai: Mar 23 2017, 04:24 PM
celciuz
post Mar 23 2017, 04:28 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(JohnLai @ Mar 23 2017, 04:17 PM)
I got mine changed back to public IP.
Oh ya, livechat agent also requested ping plotter result from me.
I simply provided her/him with the result and clarify that the ping can be lowered further if adsl noise profile is set to fastpath.  I also wrote the interleave depth is adding 25ms plus 5ms extra ping time. So, from the pingplotter result, there is total 30ms extra latency which is caused by dsl interleaving which is simply unacceptable for online gaming. I provided them the source for the info http://www.kitz.co.uk/adsl/interleaving.htm and http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/c...e-config31.html , at the bottom graph, had* the livechat agent took a look at 'burst protection' latency values because TM dsl line has it activated. In worst case scenario, interleaving can increase latency up to 47ms for depth value of 64 with INP value of 2.

You can check my interleaved dsl stats screenshot where my INP were 2.64 and 2.63 for downstream and upstream. In fastpath, INP is disabled.

EDIT: Some stuff for reading....how INP and interleave depth affect each other......fair use.....two pages only. Sourced from google book?
user posted image
user posted image
*
I would be able to identify how much ping is contributed by the interleaved mode? By saying ping plotter, it is referring to the app ping plotter right?
rhytion
post Mar 23 2017, 04:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
389 posts

Joined: Oct 2016
From: Kota Kinabalu


The live chat agent never requested anything about ping for me and they just make report to change DSL noise profile, I think they don't even know what it is.

235 Pages « < 181 182 183 184 185 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0354sec    0.60    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 06:35 PM