Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Military Thread V13
|
kimyee73
|
Sep 29 2014, 10:20 AM
|
|
QUOTE(meedoot @ Sep 27 2014, 03:57 PM) i think azriel want to reply ur comment earlier sir (bold) masalah nak buat mass production ke tak or laku ke tak jual kat obersea is different matter, the point is indo has the capability, support from gomen je masih kurang, about tech of course indo can send those engineer to other country for training or something like that.. like malaysia.. im really sure got capability to make AV8 in the future, or create other army toys, but msia gomen only buy just for malaysian army, tentu ade limit, next.. it depend on foreign sale.. kalau laku of course production continue, kalau takde foreign sale, mana nak dapat duit for the next development? it is like can or not malaysia sell those AV8 to other country ? of course can.. next.. quality and capability camne ? good of course.. next boleh laku ke tak klo nak jual kat obersea ? boleh laku and boleh tidak.. the point is.. malaysia in the future has capability to make AV8 or similar, when sh*t happen, u can put all ur resources and make ur thousands AV8 by ur own without relying on other countries..  This has always been the problem with Malaysia. We don't have enough dough but we want to berlagak like a big and rich country. We spent a lots of our budget to learn and make our own armored vehicles and warships. because we spent so much to acquire those capability, we can only buy in small quantity compare to what we really need immediately. In the end, the cost per unit is so high that we could have bought them off the shelf in quantity that we need, in timeline that we need for the same amount we spent doing it ourselves. Capability is not forever unless you continue to retain those by continue building them. Once stop, you may lost that capability as the peoples (human capital) who has those knowledge will leaves as well. Mau cari makan mah. You can create Best Known Method or procedures to preserve those capability but it is not a replacement on warm body with brain. I work in MNC and have seen capabilities gone with the people as we shut down certain dept and need to spend a lot of effort to re-acquire those same capability many years later when we need it again due to biz direction change. Also on AV8, are we sure we can build everything locally? The last I heard we still order all the chassis from Turkey. We ordered weapon system and electronics from South Africa, Europe etc. We don't manufacture them 100% by ourselves, even the raw material to make steel need to import.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kimyee73
|
Sep 29 2014, 10:30 AM
|
|
QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 28 2014, 01:49 PM) Now thre hardly tank to tank battle. The last maybe was at iraq between us abram and iraq old soviet tanks. Now it mainly as troop support. I could see why the army would not want to spend so much on a tank that are our pioneering armoured division. I was aslo told, this few batch will be our training platform for future more advance tank. No point getting the most advance tank but do not know to use its full potential, right? If we just want it for training purpose, no point getting a brand new tank which were heavily upgraded at great cost. We could follow Singapore that bought secondhand submarine to learn tools of the trade. BTW, the same applied to our submarine as well. Maybe we spent so much for brand new and modernized tanks and submarines just to create our doctrine because we know we will not buy anymore for next few decades
|
|
|
|
|
|
azriel
|
Sep 29 2014, 10:40 AM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Sep 28 2014, 02:03 PM) Light with mobility or heavy with protection, warfare doctrine determines how one will fight Nowadays tanks is molded into cavalry styled strategy where it will be accompanied by infantry and ifv when it goes out, Armored thrust? that's ww2 idiom and no longer applies to modern warfare as its only a suicide run with atgm proliferation ^^^^^ Leopard 2s armored thrust exercise? This post has been edited by azriel: Sep 29 2014, 10:42 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
remyzero09
|
Sep 29 2014, 10:51 AM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Sep 26 2014, 08:07 PM) commercial plane? they cant even build car or even motorbike i think.. Indonesia mungkin tidak ada kereta nasional sendiri. Tapi industri pertahanan mereka memang jauh ke depan lebih-lebih lagi bab pasang pesawat dan helikopter kerana mereka ada B.J Habibie, Presiden RI ke-3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._J._HabibieThis post has been edited by remyzero09: Sep 29 2014, 10:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
azriel
|
Sep 29 2014, 10:56 AM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 28 2014, 01:49 PM) Ingat ride sub pergi peru... haha cross international water and kacau here and thre. Like china and russia How do u define light and heavy? That term mainly for ww2 only. Now any tank is called mbt. No more medium, light or heavy tank except one in china. But most also are older version or experimental unit. Western block tanks are heavy and concentrate on crew protection, eastern block are light and concentrate on mobility. Crew protection is often secondary hahaha Indon leopard unit are surplus dutch old stock. They get it cheaply. Why malaysia didn't it? Well, apparently even it surplus it still expensive for our overall budget but the weight is also nother limiting factor. Not to mention our love for add-on improvement will drive up even the costT84 is almost same weight with ours pt91m. It still based on the soviet design t72 with improvement iinm. But we have been offered the mordern T90 but i not sure why the army didn't take it instead of this pt91m. Singapore? Only a few units are based on island. The rest i was told is at new zealand, canada, Germany. That whre they carry out intensive training while basic training is at sg Now thre hardly tank to tank battle. The last maybe was at iraq between us abram and iraq old soviet tanks. Now it mainly as troop support. I could see why the army would not want to spend so much on a tank that are our pioneering armoured division. I was aslo told, this few batch will be our training platform for future more advance tank. No point getting the most advance tank but do not know to use its full potential, right? Almost every country that operates the Leopard 2s bought the tanks second hand. Even Singapore bought their Leopard 2A4's second hand with half or more units upgraded to the Leopard 2SG. Btw Indonesia didn't buy the Leo 2s from the Dutch but Ex.Swiss Pz87 from Rheinmetall. The Pz87 could be easily identify from the "Snow Grouser" located on the front & side of the turret. This post has been edited by azriel: Sep 29 2014, 11:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSAxeFire
|
Sep 29 2014, 11:03 AM
|
|
tank is outdated time to introduce this  This post has been edited by AxeFire: Sep 29 2014, 11:06 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
bai1101
|
Sep 29 2014, 12:15 PM
|
|
QUOTE(AxeFire @ Sep 29 2014, 11:03 AM) tank is outdated time to introduce this   Prefer 1st pic design 2nd one feel like rpg free practice target
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frozen_Sun
|
Sep 29 2014, 12:27 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Sep 26 2014, 08:07 PM) commercial plane? they cant even build car or even motorbike i think.. Actually Indonesia produces a lot of cars each year....  Not just assembly operation. There are also facilities to build chassis and engines domestically. It's Toyota engines with 80 percent local content. What Indonesia lacks is a national brand. http://www.republika.co.id/berita/ekonomi/...ng-di-indonesia
|
|
|
|
|
|
arif85124
|
Sep 29 2014, 12:34 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 29 2014, 10:40 AM)  ^^^^^ Leopard 2s armored thrust exercise? armored thrust usually happen only after breakthrough of enemy line before that, usually still need combination of infantry, mechanized, close air support etc2 when there gap, tank will rushed into it and wreck havoc in the rear
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSAxeFire
|
Sep 29 2014, 12:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSalaskanbunny
|
Sep 29 2014, 12:57 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Sep 28 2014, 08:26 PM) QBZ-95 latest modifications Modified QBZ-95 (Bottom) with an original version (Top) they could have done a better job designing it in the first time.. bottom no rail too? QUOTE(remyzero09 @ Sep 29 2014, 10:51 AM) Indonesia mungkin tidak ada kereta nasional sendiri. Tapi industri pertahanan mereka memang jauh ke depan lebih-lebih lagi bab pasang pesawat dan helikopter kerana mereka ada B.J Habibie, Presiden RI ke-3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._J._Habibiei see... QUOTE(AxeFire @ Sep 29 2014, 11:03 AM) tank is outdated time to introduce this   watch too much sci fi / cartoon? QUOTE(Frozen_Sun @ Sep 29 2014, 12:27 PM) Actually Indonesia produces a lot of cars each year....  Not just assembly operation. There are also facilities to build chassis and engines domestically. It's Toyota engines with 80 percent local content. What Indonesia lacks is a national brand. http://www.republika.co.id/berita/ekonomi/...ng-di-indonesiagot national brand but kaput already... they cant design and high tech parts are mostly imported
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSalaskanbunny
|
Sep 29 2014, 12:57 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Sep 28 2014, 08:26 PM) QBZ-95 latest modifications Modified QBZ-95 (Bottom) with an original version (Top) they could have done a better job designing it in the first time.. bottom no rail too? QUOTE(remyzero09 @ Sep 29 2014, 10:51 AM) Indonesia mungkin tidak ada kereta nasional sendiri. Tapi industri pertahanan mereka memang jauh ke depan lebih-lebih lagi bab pasang pesawat dan helikopter kerana mereka ada B.J Habibie, Presiden RI ke-3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._J._Habibiei see... QUOTE(AxeFire @ Sep 29 2014, 11:03 AM) tank is outdated time to introduce this   watch too much sci fi / cartoon? QUOTE(Frozen_Sun @ Sep 29 2014, 12:27 PM) Actually Indonesia produces a lot of cars each year....  Not just assembly operation. There are also facilities to build chassis and engines domestically. It's Toyota engines with 80 percent local content. What Indonesia lacks is a national brand. http://www.republika.co.id/berita/ekonomi/...ng-di-indonesiagot national brand but kaput already... they cant design and high tech parts are mostly imported
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSalaskanbunny
|
Sep 29 2014, 12:57 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Sep 28 2014, 08:26 PM) QBZ-95 latest modifications Modified QBZ-95 (Bottom) with an original version (Top) they could have done a better job designing it in the first time.. bottom no rail too? QUOTE(remyzero09 @ Sep 29 2014, 10:51 AM) Indonesia mungkin tidak ada kereta nasional sendiri. Tapi industri pertahanan mereka memang jauh ke depan lebih-lebih lagi bab pasang pesawat dan helikopter kerana mereka ada B.J Habibie, Presiden RI ke-3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._J._Habibiei see... QUOTE(AxeFire @ Sep 29 2014, 11:03 AM) tank is outdated time to introduce this   watch too much sci fi / cartoon? QUOTE(Frozen_Sun @ Sep 29 2014, 12:27 PM) Actually Indonesia produces a lot of cars each year....  Not just assembly operation. There are also facilities to build chassis and engines domestically. It's Toyota engines with 80 percent local content. What Indonesia lacks is a national brand. http://www.republika.co.id/berita/ekonomi/...ng-di-indonesiagot national brand but kaput already... they cant design and high tech parts are mostly imported
|
|
|
|
|
|
waja2000
|
Sep 29 2014, 01:20 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 29 2014, 10:06 AM) the closest to most digitally and newest design on eastern block tanks is the Japan type 10 and the korea k2. China dont talk lah, copy watever design that suit them. Even during tank competition, bring their own tank against old t72 also lose rusia, the arma platform will reveal next year, wait and see. Hypes was it will be a totally new design tank leopard is also an old design with improvement add-on over the years. Anyway, production already stopped iinm, the ones sold are surplus or old stock I dont think the greman will be coming out a new tank design any time soon actually u must see they detail of competition, alot is pro-russia, china Type 96, not louse totally, only loose mainly on low engine output about 7xx hp. that already know before. anyway type 96 networked fire control system show there advantage againt other t72 during fire test. anyway type 96 is not advance tank in china. Type 10 and K2 with problematic also no point, not our army tank group/drive is all engineer level. any problem can't self basic checking and repair at field。
|
|
|
|
|
|
DDG_Ross
|
Sep 29 2014, 01:30 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 29 2014, 10:40 AM)  ^^^^^ Leopard 2s armored thrust exercise? Nice idea for photoshoot, terrible idea on real situation A column of tanks barreling down a scenic plain? Christmas present for atgm teams lol At least have ifv to guard the rear, or combat heli doing cas
|
|
|
|
|
|
azriel
|
Sep 29 2014, 01:44 PM
|
New Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
azriel
|
Sep 29 2014, 07:37 PM
|
New Member
|
It has been a busy week for the Indonesian Military with the arrivals of new armaments, launching & commissioning of new ships.
Indonesian Air Force: - Arrivals of 2nd batch of 4 units Super Tucano. - Arrivals of 2nd batch of 2 units F-16 C.
Indonesian Navy: - Arrivals of 2 unit ex-Nakhoda Ragam KRI John Lie & KRI Usman Harun. - Launching of 4 units KCR-40 & 1 unit Patrol Craft. - Commissioning of LST KRI Teluk Bintuni. - Commissioning of Oiler & Replenishment Ship KRI Tarakan.
Indonesian Army: - Arrivals of 1st batch of 4 units Caesar 155mm SPH.
This post has been edited by azriel: Sep 29 2014, 07:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
MilitaryMadness
|
Sep 29 2014, 10:15 PM
|
|
Bizarre....Why is Chiangbai Shan LPD having ship-washing contest with TNI-AL corvette KRI Frans Kaisepo? QUOTE
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frozen_Sun
|
Sep 29 2014, 11:16 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Sep 29 2014, 10:15 PM) Bizarre....Why is Chiangbai Shan LPD having ship-washing contest with TNI-AL corvette KRI Frans Kaisepo? firefighting exercise......but useful for spraying fishing boats too
|
|
|
|
|