Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

8 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 CVT(CHAT), User may share your exprience here.

views
     
SUSMatrix
post Aug 13 2014, 02:55 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(lucifah @ Aug 13 2014, 02:53 PM)
mitsu sc.

*touch wood*
even honda SC cocked up with their city's cvt last time.
*
Yep...that is why everyone keeping high alert when it comes to CVT fluid replacement!!!! sweat.gif

I check the bottles at my Proton SC when they change my CVT oil...just to make sure no screw up. Later they put Saga CVT oil...Kanasai....you know lar...in bolehland SC, apa pun boleh.
SUSmelvinho
post Aug 13 2014, 03:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
103 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(Khalid21 @ Aug 13 2014, 02:53 PM)
Mitsubishi sc recommended to flushing your cvt everytime it replace cvt oil
Mit ASX CVT oil 6 lit and another 6 lit for flushing the cost almost rm 600
How about proton inspira .. Proton sc recommended to do flushing or replace oil only
*
i did my CVTF change earlier 12k KM due to the sc change my flywheels and starter motor. They drain off my existing CVTF and reuse back.
After that only i feel the car jerk and RPM stuck @ 2.5k
dstl1128
post Aug 13 2014, 03:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
A reuse?! That is not CVTF change at all.
edison1437
post Aug 13 2014, 03:17 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(Khalid21 @ Aug 13 2014, 02:53 PM)
Mitsubishi sc recommended to flushing your cvt everytime it replace cvt oil
Mit ASX CVT oil 6 lit and another 6 lit for flushing the cost almost rm 600
How about proton inspira .. Proton sc recommended to do flushing or replace oil only
*
if you change the CVTF frequently need no flush la waste of money only
SUSMatrix
post Aug 13 2014, 03:19 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(edison1437 @ Aug 13 2014, 03:17 PM)
if you change the CVTF frequently need no flush la waste of money only
*
I didnt flush wor...I change at 40k km...but 3rd year...sweat.gif...
SC didnt mentioned any flushing...hmm.gif

This post has been edited by Matrix: Aug 13 2014, 03:20 PM
edison1437
post Aug 13 2014, 03:20 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(Matrix @ Aug 13 2014, 03:19 PM)
I didnt flush wor...I change at 40k km...but 3rd year...sweat.gif...
*
i also changed mine at 40k but roughly 1 and half year of ownership
SUSMatrix
post Aug 13 2014, 03:22 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(edison1437 @ Aug 13 2014, 03:20 PM)
i also changed mine at 40k but roughly 1 and half year of ownership
*
My mileage very low...supposely want to change at year 2...somehow forgot...

Khalid21
post Aug 13 2014, 03:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,138 posts

Joined: May 2010
QUOTE(Matrix @ Aug 13 2014, 03:19 PM)
I didnt flush wor...I change at 40k km...but 3rd year...sweat.gif...
SC didnt mentioned any flushing...hmm.gif
*
mitsubishi recommended every 40K (2years) to replace cvtf and flushing
SUSmelvinho
post Aug 13 2014, 03:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
103 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(Khalid21 @ Aug 13 2014, 03:23 PM)
mitsubishi recommended every 40K (2years)  to replace cvtf and flushing
*
i change earlier coz they reuse the cvtf while replacement of flywheels and starter motor

SUSMatrix
post Aug 13 2014, 04:04 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(melvinho @ Aug 13 2014, 03:25 PM)
i change earlier coz they reuse the cvtf while replacement of flywheels and starter motor
*
Change flywheel and starter motor affects gearbox??? hmm.gif...
k!nex
post Aug 13 2014, 04:10 PM

Restless stars
*******
Senior Member
3,391 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: KL


QUOTE(Matrix @ Aug 13 2014, 04:04 PM)
Change flywheel and starter motor affects gearbox???  hmm.gif...
*
If not, how to take out the flywheel if you don't take out the gearbox ?
SUSMatrix
post Aug 13 2014, 04:13 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(k!nex @ Aug 13 2014, 04:10 PM)
If not, how to take out the flywheel if you don't take out the gearbox ?
*
Ooh...i see, not really sure how the flywheel links to the GB!
satrianeo-x
post Aug 13 2014, 04:29 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
434 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
I tend to have a different approach to this. I leave it at D. CO in my mind, if you shift it from D to N to D so often (esp when u in a slow moving jam) you tend to put more stress on the auto gearbox. owever if it is a major NON-MOVING-FOR-LONG-TIME jam or a traffic light that takes ages to turn green, I would shift to N and wait. So for me, it really depends how long my car stops, and not on a crawling stop-and-go traffic. In fact, to do that there may be more dangerous.

Just sharing. Of course I could be wrong
Myth No. 5: It's best to shift an automatic transmission into Neutral at red lights. This myth stems from the idea that keeping the transmission in Drive while stepping on the brake wastes fuel and causes unnecessary wear on the driveline. In fact, actual engine wear and fuel loss are minimal.

Regularly shifting from Neutral and back into Drive when the light turns green, then immediately stepping on the gas, can wear — albeit slightly — on the transmission, driveline and engine mounts. Ultimately, these stoplight antics probably won't amount to any measurable harm or good; they're likely just a habit by folks who need to keep their hand busy with the gear selector. Our advice? Get a stick shift.


source: http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story.jsp?se...h&story=ydMyths




QUOTE(Matrix @ Aug 13 2014, 11:45 AM)
Actually, i never know what's the correct thing to do....glad my habits is the right one...LOL.

Dug some info with good explanation to share:

http://www.topgear.com.ph/features/columns...tuck-in-traffic
Yep, for passenger comfort and normal driving, CVT is really gooding...no shift-shock nonsense....
*
dstl1128
post Aug 13 2014, 04:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
>> In fact, actual engine wear and fuel loss are minimal.
Who cares about engine wear and fuel loss. Those are very insignificant. Concerned is on transmission wear.

>>Regularly shifting from Neutral and back into Drive when the light turns green, then immediately stepping on the gas, can wear
This will wear. There's some slack time for those hydraulic ancillary to complete their job (i.e. to engage a gear) before an auto engages. If one shift to D and immediate step on the gas, the engine will just free rev (like in N) for short time, and then suddenly engage ('duk' sound from the gear) and the car sudden surge forward.

Just shift to D (while on a brake), wait for some split second, or 1 sec, then pedal your way out.
satrianeo-x
post Aug 13 2014, 04:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
434 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
fr traffic lights that turns fairly fast I leave it at D. Let's agree to disagree smile.gif Perhaps new CVT don't need that and has a diff appoach, as they now have that thing call i-STOP. Which i think is an extra bit of disaster waiting to happen. I would disable it immediately. Am a bit too old-skool like that.
dares
post Aug 13 2014, 07:23 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(Matrix @ Aug 13 2014, 04:13 PM)
Ooh...i see, not really sure how the flywheel links to the GB!
*
Crankshaft -> flywheel -> clutch / torque converter -> gearbox
SUSMatrix
post Aug 13 2014, 07:26 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(dares @ Aug 13 2014, 07:23 PM)
Crankshaft -> flywheel -> clutch / torque converter -> gearbox
*
Tq, sifu! notworthy.gif
Razsus
post Aug 13 2014, 09:05 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2012


Saga CVT count ? doh.gif
So far 3 times CVT light up with different situation doh.gif
1st, was testing brake do a couple times of hard braking from around 80 to 100 to a complete stop, CVT light up engine cant move.
2nd, Slight downhill, see bump speed around 50 or 60kmh brake( not hard braking ) CVT light up.
This both after restart engine problem solve.
3rd, speeding around 120-130kmh and out of a sudden without braking CVT light up doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif but after 5seconds light off sleep.gif
briantft
post Aug 13 2014, 10:24 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2012
QUOTE(Icetea87 @ Aug 13 2014, 01:03 PM)
Here is my review for cvt transmission, i have been using it for 2.5 years. Car model saga flx 1.3.

- smoot ride, reads no 'push back' feeling when accelerate. When trying to overtake, you press down the gas pedal, rpm shoot up, maintain at 4k rpm but car speed climb too slowly. Power delivery was delayed for at least 2-3 seconds. Solution , switch to sat mode when driving in highway. Town drving in d mode.

- good for hill climb. Can maintain speed when climbing up hill but engine sound will be rough and harsh due to high rpm while climbing hill. Solution. Insullate the car with sound deadening material , but it is a saga so meh....

- jerky in the morning, traffic jam. Solution , let go brake, let the gearbox do the work, once u feel the car is rolling only you can start giving some gas. Or else it will jerk. Rubber band effect is  strong there.

- fuel saving ? Not really. 11-12l per km for a small car.
You can argue that is driver issue or traffic condition but for me this fuel consumption figure is alright but can be better.

I test drove the old sylphy n inspira. The rubber band effect is there. Maybe cvt is not for me but i just going to make use of what i have for now. I have yet to test drive the new city.
*
To be honest bro, i think it is really the saga's cvt only, not all the cvt are behaving like that. So far, i have driven only 2 types of cvt before, the Prius E-CVT and Altis's 7 speed CVT, so i can only tell the characteristics of these 2 cvts. For Prius's CVT, you can't feel the gear switching and changing like you normally will feel from normal AT or DCT/DSG. This, you got no feeling at all. At first, i though it was slow but when i tested it with OBD and apps, it shows from 0-100km/h, within 10 second. Well, it is not sports car fast but i can say it is relatively fast, with 1425kg in weight. If you floor the accelerator pedal, no tyre spinning will happen caz of traction control and VSC, you don't get to spin the tyre. Then if you look at dashboard, the speed shown will jump quite fast and suddenly, you reached 150km/h. The CVT for Prius is using timing chain so no replacement nor rubber effect will be detected; transmission fluid is WS grade so no need to change within the lifespan of the car, but if you want to get it replace every 100k km, be my guess. It is exceptionally quiet, smooth, powerful and not so fun to drive like manual or DSG/DCT but if you opt for something comfortable for you and ur passenger, or piece of mind during busy traffic period, CVT is a very good choice.
Altis's CVT is 7 speed but Toyota has made a kinda funny "features" and for some reasonss, UMW added a simulated gear changing sound whenever you press the gas pedal to imitate the gear changing incident like normal AT has, but you dun get the feel of gear changing but only the gear changing sound. For CVT, gear ration basically is quite wide, though Altis's cvt is 7 speed but still, because of the unique characteristics of cvt, gear changing can't really be felt. This 7 speed cvt is relatively smooth, no jerky nor lag in power, easy control and transmission of power is almost instant, whenever you press the gas pedal, the engine and transmission will feed the car up to the speed that you want, say overtaking other vehicle is easy, no delay and fast.
Between car with AT, DSG/DCT and cvt, i will go for cvt over the other 2 options. Only if the reliability and durability of DSG/DCT has significant improved, no way i will go for it though they are the most fun to drive. No offense to P1, but my dad's saga also have the same behavior like you have described. Once compare with the CVT in Prius and Altis, i am curious as well why so much different between Toyota and P1.
SUSwaiora_protuner
post Aug 13 2014, 10:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
237 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
CVT is the future...

so far no issue for me...


8 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0226sec    1.19    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 08:23 PM