yeah.. FF camera and the latest sel1635z lens is within my budget but I only use on travel and random shot so the camera size and weight is the problem.. not really a hardcore photographer even my camera gear dealer asked me to stick with ASPC. I'm just curious about FF camera and Lens.

if you can afford,why not?at least no need pening2 d to change cam after this...you go boy!!!

Comments and critiques always welcomed~

asd-00420 by bdrc, on Flickr

asd-0643 by bdrc, on Flickr

asd-0156 by bdrc, on Flickr

asd--3 by bdrc, on Flickr

Anyone saw the a7II 5 axis stabilization video yet? Damn gooding wei with FF sum more ... price sure lagi bomb from a7r/s.



Sony a7II

Ah...OK

This distortion




I was thinking about the straight lines

Is fisheye lens an intentional distortion for UWA view?

I still cant appreciate fisheye lens

A7 is best low light performer?

You have the trigger trap mobile!!
How is it working?

u mean A7S?

or u mean A7 good with low light?

You're thinking too much

It is not an issue of intention but characteristics of the lens with that focal length.

Fish eye and UWA are two different products. you can get reasonable straight lines down the middle of the lens with good (compensated) UWA - about 11mm on a SEL1018 lens.. Fish eye will only give you straight horizon in the middle anything else beyond is curve.

But both classes of lens will give you pincushion effect..

As a matter of comparison.. very few lens will give you a total flat focal plane and very few were ever made.. Lens like the older A1 50 mm micro nikkor is among the few reputable lens capable of giving that and used extensively in the old days for accurate flat table reproduction.

It is in the physics of light bending/ lens design that it will bend due to longer distance light has to travel at the outer edges and are also contributing factors of why these lens are so expensive or get soft edges and all sorts of shortcoming for some.

True, fish eye is not everyone cup of tea and the good lens quality ones will burn big holes in the pocket. UWA is a lot easier to use but poor/deliberate placing of especially human can turn them into instant rubberperson or giants among peers in group photo.

You can post process correct some of the lens defect but that is another story.

Best you know your hardware limitations and use it to for its ability.

[quote=Slevin Sent,Nov 24 2014, 03:19 PM]u mean A7S?

or u mean A7 good with low light?

[S/quote]

Sorry, I meatnt A7S is best with low light, compared to A7R and A7.

This post has been edited by chinkw1: Nov 24 2014, 05:12 PM

That's definitely caused by lens distortion. So in this case of saying is it viable to use a brick wall as a guide, then yes, it can.

As for fisheye, it really depends. Some ppl can pull it off pretty well. Some just over do it.

[quote=chinkw1,Nov 24 2014, 05:09 PM]
[quote=Slevin Sent,Nov 24 2014, 03:19 PM]u mean A7S?

or u mean A7 good with low light?

[S/quote]

Sorry, I meatnt A7S is best with low light, compared to A7R and A7.

[/quote]

in general, yes its the best

working like charm...

ok i plan to get one as it is much affordable with more features compare to other trigger.
btw, can it be used for Lightning trigger?

If you are not certain that you need it, it's very likely you don't need it. Go buy other stuff.

Hey guys, long time no spam. Here's some shots:


Sunrise Over Japan by Eirakkun, on Flickr


Nozomi Arrival by Eirakkun, on Flickr

A7S raw file support in Lightroom 5.5 ?

Can any good people here send me one RAW file for A7S pls?

Sony lens 24-70 is F4 only, no F2.8 meh?

This post has been edited by chinkw1: Nov 25 2014, 04:00 PM

I think cant....

http://triggertrap.com/the-triggertrap-lightning-mode/

This post has been edited by tenchi0205: Nov 25 2014, 04:32 PM