DSC00692 by bdrc, on FlickrBirding
DSC00480 by bdrc, on Flickrcosplay - Kanato of Diabolik Lovers
DSC01297-2 by bdrc, on FlickrPhotography The Sony Alpha Thread V60, From A to E mount!
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 01:32 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,626 posts Joined: Feb 2007 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 01:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
QUOTE(IwanAGP @ Sep 23 2014, 12:39 AM) Seriously? I thought it's completely the same? Same sensor thus same pixel focus thingy, same number of AF points also. Oh then i might be wrong. From DxO sensor test, their performance has a little difference. http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Sid...A6000___967_942 This post has been edited by yok70: Sep 23 2014, 01:44 AM |
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 01:47 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
QUOTE(ry.tan9119 @ Sep 23 2014, 12:59 AM) who cares about video codec when choosing entry level or semi-pro level mirrorless camera when u more serious on photography than videography? furthermore, sony engineer wouldn't simply made A6000 image sensor for A5100, nor marketing suggest A5100 100% inherit A6000's performance. if really does, it will spoil A6000's market. if u really serious on video quality, go for A7S Nowadays, many "hybrid" users on cameras. People want the best money spent on their investment. Best is both photo and video are good.I'm serious on video, so same thought as you, I bought the A7S. It produce excellent photo quality too, just scarifies resolution. fyi, camera makers do disable some features on lower-end models that actually already have those features on their hardware. A good example is recently, Sony's F5 being hacked and the hacker publicly announced they successfully enable the "locked" 4K video shooting feature. Just few weeks later, Sony has no choice but to officially announced that owners of the F5 camera can get this 4K feature "unlocked" from their camera but need to pay an "unlocking fees" of US$1000. This post has been edited by yok70: Sep 23 2014, 01:55 AM |
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 01:49 AM
|
|
Elite
394 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
its the same sensor, but build differently for different market mass.
grab the one with EVF, u never know how useful that EVF is when u are sniping chicks... review in EVF then in LCD where the whole public looking at you. |
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 01:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,698 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: kuala lumpur |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 02:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,590 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: S'wak||KL||SG |
QUOTE(vincentlee90 @ Sep 23 2014, 12:55 AM) both image sensor is not exactly same, and certainly A6000's image sensor better than A5100, u can see the difference especially the dynamic range QUOTE(ry.tan9119 @ Sep 23 2014, 12:59 AM) who cares about video codec when choosing entry level or semi-pro level mirrorless camera when u more serious on photography than videography? furthermore, sony engineer wouldn't simply made A6000 image sensor for A5100, nor marketing suggest A5100 100% inherit A6000's performance. if really does, it will spoil A6000's market. if u really serious on video quality, go for A7S Erm... But this is what ppl talking about in many photography forums. That's why I bring up this concern la. Of course it's still entry level. But the even more entry level A5100 has it. Why slightly higher level A6000 doesn't get it? That's the question Marketing wise, yeah I understand... But being priced slightly lower yet getting some of the plus make ppl like me feel unbalanced mah. QUOTE(yok70 @ Sep 23 2014, 01:40 AM) Oh then i might be wrong. But ISO rating matches completely. Sony limiting the dynamic range and color depth on A5100? From DxO sensor test, their performance has a little difference. http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Sid...A6000___967_942 QUOTE(yok70 @ Sep 23 2014, 01:47 AM) Nowadays, many "hybrid" users on cameras. People want the best money spent on their investment. Best is both photo and video are good. The bold part is the really true part I'm serious on video, so same thought as you, I bought the A7S. It produce excellent photo quality too, just scarifies resolution. fyi, camera makers do disable some features on lower-end models that actually already have those features on their hardware. A good example is recently, Sony's F5 being hacked and the hacker publicly announced they successfully enable the "locked" 4K video shooting feature. Just few weeks later, Sony has no choice but to officially announced that owners of the F5 camera can get this 4K feature "unlocked" from their camera but need to pay an "unlocking fees" of US$1000. QUOTE(edpaul @ Sep 23 2014, 01:49 AM) its the same sensor, but build differently for different market mass. Roger that. Nice reasoning btw.grab the one with EVF, u never know how useful that EVF is when u are sniping chicks... review in EVF then in LCD where the whole public looking at you. Btw... I know you all play big guns one la. Me baru start mah where can use your mindset to look at it the same way. A7? Even if I have the money for that but no, I won't allocate my money for that. That's the difference between you all who are already deep into photography and people like me which is still making the entry. To start is not something easy also... I'm just trying to get something that will last longer mah, till the next upgrade perhaps. Anyway... Keep shooting guys. Will report back in if I really grab the A6000 Bye |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 05:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
707 posts Joined: Feb 2010 |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 07:33 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1148
|
![]()
Junior Member
44 posts Joined: Oct 2013 |
QUOTE(IwanAGP @ Sep 23 2014, 02:05 AM) Erm... But this is what ppl talking about in many photography forums. That's why I bring up this concern la. Of course it's still entry level. But the even more entry level A5100 has it. Why slightly higher level A6000 doesn't get it? That's the question I ask u, if sony announced A5100 without hybrid AF, better video codec, still around that pricing, will u willing to buy the new model? the answers is in ur mindMarketing wise, yeah I understand... But being priced slightly lower yet getting some of the plus make ppl like me feel unbalanced mah. QUOTE(yok70 @ Sep 23 2014, 01:47 AM) Nowadays, many "hybrid" users on cameras. People want the best money spent on their investment. Best is both photo and video are good. I do understand ur meaning, however, most ppl is demanding steak quality with nasi lemak priceI'm serious on video, so same thought as you, I bought the A7S. It produce excellent photo quality too, just scarifies resolution. fyi, camera makers do disable some features on lower-end models that actually already have those features on their hardware. A good example is recently, Sony's F5 being hacked and the hacker publicly announced they successfully enable the "locked" 4K video shooting feature. Just few weeks later, Sony has no choice but to officially announced that owners of the F5 camera can get this 4K feature "unlocked" from their camera but need to pay an "unlocking fees" of US$1000. |
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 10:30 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1149
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,070 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Damansara |
QUOTE(saigetsu @ Sep 23 2014, 05:09 AM) easy bro if u understand basic photography...the subject distance to camera should be less then the subject distance to background...then u can achieve nice bokeh even with f3.5.... eq : camera > subject (30cm) subject > background (1m) |
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 10:44 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
755 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Back to the Historic |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 01:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,619 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(vincentlee90 @ Sep 22 2014, 11:08 PM) u ask a forum member named Ah Hao. he had bought A5100 and he quite regret of purchase A5100. for me, i don't like the simple design of A5100 and odd touch screen operation, as Ah Hao mentioned earlier I just hate the touchscreen function, only limited for touch focus and touch shutter, then other thing like menu, setting etc totally cant use, so freaking lame feature. But I still appreciate the smaller size though,when compare to a6000. I suggest potential buyer dont consider touchscreen as a pros in a5100,its is really quite useless =.= |
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 01:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
755 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Back to the Historic |
QUOTE(Ah hao @ Sep 23 2014, 01:46 PM) I just hate the touchscreen function, only limited for touch focus and touch shutter, then other thing like menu, setting etc totally cant use, so freaking lame feature. Hmm. My old Nex5r can touch the menuBut I still appreciate the smaller size though,when compare to a6000. I suggest potential buyer dont consider touchscreen as a pros in a5100,its is really quite useless =.= |
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 03:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,481 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
seriously? $1000 USD??? dats crazyyyy
QUOTE(yok70 @ Sep 23 2014, 01:47 AM) Nowadays, many "hybrid" users on cameras. People want the best money spent on their investment. Best is both photo and video are good. I'm serious on video, so same thought as you, I bought the A7S. It produce excellent photo quality too, just scarifies resolution. fyi, camera makers do disable some features on lower-end models that actually already have those features on their hardware. A good example is recently, Sony's F5 being hacked and the hacker publicly announced they successfully enable the "locked" 4K video shooting feature. Just few weeks later, Sony has no choice but to officially announced that owners of the F5 camera can get this 4K feature "unlocked" from their camera but need to pay an "unlocking fees" of US$1000. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 03:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,481 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 03:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,626 posts Joined: Feb 2007 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(awiekupo @ Sep 23 2014, 03:13 PM) QUOTE(saigetsu @ Sep 23 2014, 05:09 AM) Shot with the SE30mm f/3.5 macro lens. Quite close to the object. It's not cherry though, it's black grapes actually. |
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 04:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
707 posts Joined: Feb 2010 |
QUOTE(bdrc @ Sep 23 2014, 03:25 PM) Shot with the SE30mm f/3.5 macro lens. Quite close to the object. i dun think normal std kit lens can achive like this. i think because of macro la.It's not cherry though, it's black grapes actually. see the plate oso starts to blur on edge. normal lens cannot one. sure blur the whole thing. |
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 04:19 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1157
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,070 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Damansara |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 04:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
707 posts Joined: Feb 2010 |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 05:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,626 posts Joined: Feb 2007 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2014, 07:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,619 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
Any seller here have stock for sel 35mm 1.8 and sel10-18 ?
In kl till tomorrow, want to buy immediately before going b jb... |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0236sec
1.26
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 08:02 AM |