QUOTE(mayonnaiseeeee @ Dec 15 2013, 10:12 PM)
P1 Sheila from Elit.
P3 Michael Mainwaring's Taught Course + IRC is sufficient.
i studied my p1 under sheila. she was able to covered about 25 pyq (if i remember correctly. i guess more than that). cases were discussed in detail. i think that's really important. anyone doing acca would recognise the importance of getting familiar with the pyq. but i believe she has covered more than the syllabus. the only drawback as long as i'm considered. so her notes is thick but after all well organised. she's helpful and very kind.
as for p3, i did mine with parminder. honestly not to my liking. but it really depends. lots of them said he's good and that's also why i picked him. he never discuss pyq. his notes is unorganised. messy. and also, okay, this is my feeling. for me he tends to beat around the bush with everything. i don't know. but some people really enjoy i guess. sometimes it's really frustrating because i got to rush to his class after work knowing there're works piled high on my desk and that day he'd discuss just 3-5 pages maybe.
i then attended michael's irc for p3 because i wasn't confident in passing the paper. his teaching is good. his note is good. i've learnt a lot, really a lot, in just 3 days, amazing. i didn't know he got something called taught course. otherwise i'd go. i'm very sure his 4 days taught course (4 days i guess) can cover whole syllabus. because he could cover all important topics in the 3 days irc i attended besides discussing cases and exam techniques. so i'm sure he can do a lot more with the another 4 days.
but i need to know about p2. any info on p2? comments on lecturers? thanks!
I've been under Menon for P2. Well, I didn't really like her because she was super strict and the hours could be too long for me. But, I did pass P2 under her. She really knows her stuffs and her notes are very complete. Also, being a P2 lecturer for so long I think she only missed her predictions once so far. That was the sem that Sunway's P2 pass rates dropped. Says a lot about her experience. I'd recommend her especially if you're hardworking.P3 Michael Mainwaring's Taught Course + IRC is sufficient.
i studied my p1 under sheila. she was able to covered about 25 pyq (if i remember correctly. i guess more than that). cases were discussed in detail. i think that's really important. anyone doing acca would recognise the importance of getting familiar with the pyq. but i believe she has covered more than the syllabus. the only drawback as long as i'm considered. so her notes is thick but after all well organised. she's helpful and very kind.
as for p3, i did mine with parminder. honestly not to my liking. but it really depends. lots of them said he's good and that's also why i picked him. he never discuss pyq. his notes is unorganised. messy. and also, okay, this is my feeling. for me he tends to beat around the bush with everything. i don't know. but some people really enjoy i guess. sometimes it's really frustrating because i got to rush to his class after work knowing there're works piled high on my desk and that day he'd discuss just 3-5 pages maybe.
i then attended michael's irc for p3 because i wasn't confident in passing the paper. his teaching is good. his note is good. i've learnt a lot, really a lot, in just 3 days, amazing. i didn't know he got something called taught course. otherwise i'd go. i'm very sure his 4 days taught course (4 days i guess) can cover whole syllabus. because he could cover all important topics in the 3 days irc i attended besides discussing cases and exam techniques. so i'm sure he can do a lot more with the another 4 days.
but i need to know about p2. any info on p2? comments on lecturers? thanks!
Oh and she covers a crazy amount of PYQs especially during her revision class. Sometimes the revision could end as late as 10pm. But no complains because she is also sacrificing her time to help us.
QUOTE(oOoproz @ Dec 16 2013, 04:31 AM)
P2 and P3 next sem... Should I take p3 after result?? what do u think? I scare i can't catch up only
Why take after results? Is there a purpose or just want to take an extra 2 months break? I'm pretty sure P3 wouldn't be a problem to catch up. It's mostly theory which you can get by reading the textbook. Classes aren't even a must for this subject in my opinion.This post has been edited by nick67: Dec 16 2013, 11:18 AM
Dec 16 2013, 11:16 AM

Quote
0.0284sec
0.29
6 queries
GZIP Disabled