Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.23, National Geography edition
|
|
 Dec 30 2013, 10:37 PM
|
 
Elite
3,249 posts Joined: Oct 2011  
|
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Dec 30 2013, 04:38 PM) bt no use la 24-105 since is f4. i'd rather get used 2470 f2.8 from third party for that price.. not sure if you can get any FF zoom lens with USM+IS+wide to tele zoom in rm2k stick to used d600   |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2013, 11:24 PM
|
Elite
1,557 posts Joined: Dec 2011
|
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Dec 30 2013, 10:37 PM) not sure if you can get any FF zoom lens with USM+IS+wide to tele zoom in rm2k you're right too..plus L lens summore..really good value bt not a must for me, so kinda wasted though..rather save some for primes. |
|
|
Dec 30 2013, 11:56 PM
|
|
Elite
3,249 posts Joined: Oct 2011
|
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Dec 30 2013, 11:24 PM) you're right too..plus L lens summore..really good value bt not a must for me, so kinda wasted though.. yeah, it's a great value lens, not to forget weather sealing rather save some for primes.  but means nothing though if you are not needing the range and convenient. |
|
|
Dec 30 2013, 11:57 PM
|
 
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Dec 30 2013, 10:12 AM) 50 1.4G i think.. D would be fine too..see which one sharper. Its all about the pixel density now... FF like D800 has high pixel density, equivalent to the D7000. But then again, those 20+ MP DX sensors like D7100... is going to need even higher shutter than the D800. ya right.. i almost forgot bout that. bt that's from crop body rite? if FF i think 1/80 enuf. That's why I still like my D700, 12MP FF very forgiving sensor on shake  |
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 12:02 AM
|
|
Elite
1,557 posts Joined: Dec 2011
|
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « dun make me wanna jump to canon la. my frens around me all using nikon.. btw i got the feeling the 35mm 1.8G FX would be around price of 85mm 1.8G or even higher.. >.< |
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 12:03 AM
|
|
Elite
3,249 posts Joined: Oct 2011
|
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Dec 31 2013, 12:02 AM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « dun make me wanna jump to canon la. my frens around me all using nikon.. btw i got the feeling the 35mm 1.8G FX would be around price of 85mm 1.8G or even higher.. >.<  |
|
|
|
|
|
 Dec 31 2013, 12:17 AM
|
Elite
1,193 posts Joined: Aug 2011 From: Miri, Sarawak 
|
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Dec 31 2013, 12:02 AM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « dun make me wanna jump to canon la. my frens around me all using nikon.. btw i got the feeling the 35mm 1.8G FX would be around price of 85mm 1.8G or even higher.. >.<   |
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 12:18 AM
|
|
Elite
1,193 posts Joined: Aug 2011 From: Miri, Sarawak
|
QUOTE(cognac @ Dec 30 2013, 09:53 PM) oh...ok... I dont think they can do it so fast do i need to leave it there, or they can do it on the spot? They need to disassemble the lens to clean the fungus...  |
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 12:19 AM
|
Senior Member
6,779 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Kuala Terengganu
|
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Dec 31 2013, 12:02 AM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « dun make me wanna jump to canon la. my frens around me all using nikon.. btw i got the feeling the 35mm 1.8G FX would be around price of 85mm 1.8G or even higher.. >.< |
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 12:22 AM
|
|
Elite
1,557 posts Joined: Dec 2011
|
QUOTE(chongkiatz @ Dec 31 2013, 12:19 AM) Can the 35mm f1.8 dx lens used on fx? ya sure. bt with slight vignetting wide open (which looks like how we usually do it in photoshop)bt at f2.8 and smaller, can see obvious vignette which needs to be cropped a little. |
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 12:24 AM
|
Senior Member
693 posts Joined: Dec 2007
|
QUOTE(Pro3363 @ Dec 31 2013, 12:17 AM) Just dont be higher than RM1.5k If higher than 1.5K then I'll go straight for the sigma already |
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 12:28 AM
|
|
Elite
1,557 posts Joined: Dec 2011
|
QUOTE(gunzerdude @ Dec 31 2013, 12:24 AM) If higher than 1.5K then I'll go straight for the sigma already i think probably 1.4-1.6k.. hmm.. random guess. |
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 02:14 AM
|
Senior Member
4,925 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
35mm 1.8 FX will be more then 1.5k
See the 28mm 1.8G for example and dont diss canon 24-105mm F4. Its a great lens. Very useful for everyday use and very good for video recording thanks to its IS. Nikon doesnt have this kind of lens (interm of price and perf la. nikon 24-120mm F4 expensive and slow i heard) so i reckon the new sigma 24-105mm F4 will be popular among nikon video kaki. I know shinchan excited about it |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 08:20 AM
|
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006
|
Bought.
 RM780...at the lower side of my expected range. |
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 08:32 AM
|
|
Elite
1,557 posts Joined: Dec 2011
|
QUOTE(gnome @ Dec 31 2013, 02:14 AM) 35mm 1.8 FX will be more then 1.5k siggy 24-105 f4? just came out a? hw much?See the 28mm 1.8G for example yeah depends also.. if no gold ring, will be less than 1.6k.. with gold ring, >1.6k.. i think no gold ring la. since 85mm 1.8g oso no gold ring haha. and dont diss canon 24-105mm F4. Its a great lens. Very useful for everyday use and very good for video recording thanks to its IS. Nikon doesnt have this kind of lens (interm of price and perf la. nikon 24-120mm F4 expensive and slow i heard) so i reckon the new sigma 24-105mm F4 will be popular among nikon video kaki. I know shinchan excited about it edit: found it.. rm2790 at miyamondo This post has been edited by f5calvin: Dec 31 2013, 09:10 AM |
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 09:13 AM
|
|
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006
|
Guys, if i want to remained same coverage for my 35mm prime same as 18mm, how much distance i need to move back? How to calculate? Any cheat sheet?
|
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 09:15 AM
|
|
Elite
1,557 posts Joined: Dec 2011
|
QUOTE(coolkwc @ Dec 31 2013, 09:13 AM) Guys, if i want to remained same coverage for my 35mm prime same as 18mm, how much distance i need to move back? How to calculate? Any cheat sheet? roughly around twice the distance. lets say the subject 1 metre in fron of u when using 18mm, then u must go 2m when using 35mm.. i think so la. |
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 09:59 AM
|
|
Elite
1,193 posts Joined: Aug 2011 From: Miri, Sarawak
|
QUOTE(coolkwc @ Dec 31 2013, 09:13 AM) Guys, if i want to remained same coverage for my 35mm prime same as 18mm, how much distance i need to move back? How to calculate? Any cheat sheet? U have been too technical lah bro... u should go out and shoot more to gain experience  This post has been edited by Pro3363: Dec 31 2013, 09:59 AM |
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 10:03 AM
|
|
Senior Member
693 posts Joined: Dec 2007
|
QUOTE(gnome @ Dec 31 2013, 02:14 AM) 35mm 1.8 FX will be more then 1.5k The wider the lens, the more difficult it is to make, and the higher the price. A 1.5K price point is a logical one considering the price of the previous 35F2DSee the 28mm 1.8G for example and dont diss canon 24-105mm F4. Its a great lens. Very useful for everyday use and very good for video recording thanks to its IS. Nikon doesnt have this kind of lens (interm of price and perf la. nikon 24-120mm F4 expensive and slow i heard) so i reckon the new sigma 24-105mm F4 will be popular among nikon video kaki. I know shinchan excited about it Don't diss nikon's 24-120 either, yes it may be expensive, but it's a good lens nonetheless. Don't really get what you mean by slow tho  Edit: ahh, I forgot, it's common for canon pipu to call nikon lenses slow. Yeah, af is slow compared to canon's USM motors, but still quite fast imo. This post has been edited by gunzerdude: Dec 31 2013, 10:06 AM |
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 10:39 AM
|
|
Senior Member
4,925 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
For that kind of money and grade its slow. Some say on par with 85mm 1.4G focusing speed and iirc CY say 85mm focusing not that quick lol
and dont talk about logical with nikon, they seems to be out of it atm. case to point the D610 and 58mm 1.4G |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0353sec
 0.81
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 06:23 PM |
Quote