Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
127 Pages « < 48 49 50 51 52 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Proton Prevé V19, Welcome our brother Suprima S

views
     
SportyHandling
post Dec 9 2013, 12:43 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
623 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(Khai RULE @ Dec 9 2013, 12:29 PM)
Have you tried different fuel for you Preve?

I find my car have different engine noise when using different Fuel.

The CFE engine sound is sweeter when using RON 97, irregardless of brand. and only Esso and BHP sounded Ok with RON95.

My Mileage now 11000 km. I believe the car is improving as the mileage grows. Less rattling, more refined.
*
Yes, I have tried Petronas Primax, Caltex Techron and BHP only. When the mileage is lower, say between 1,000km to 8,000km, Caltex seems to provide a more powerful acceleration compared to Petronas. BHP is also good but Caltex feels great. The car seems to be less energetic ie. less powerful acceleration, coupled by engine knocking with Petronas. With Caltex and BHP, more powerful acceleration and less knocking.

But know, with the mileage >8,000km, seems like the type of fuel is more or less similar. Little or no more knocking with all types of fuel, even Petronas Primax.

I didn't try RON97 before. Perhaps I will try sometime. Do you pump RON97 everytime, or you just tried RON97 just for several times before switching to RON95?

Yes, I agree that the engine sounds slightly more refined wtih more mileage. My car is about 8,700km now. Still 1,300km to go before the 10,000km service, and I expect the performance from the engine to be better, more refined and smoother acceleration.
sanadi
post Dec 9 2013, 12:54 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
9 posts

Joined: May 2012
QUOTE(SportyHandling @ Dec 9 2013, 12:43 PM)
Yes, I have tried Petronas Primax, Caltex Techron and BHP only. When the mileage is lower, say between 1,000km to 8,000km, Caltex seems to provide a more powerful acceleration compared to Petronas. BHP is also good but Caltex feels great. The car seems to be less energetic ie. less powerful acceleration, coupled by engine knocking with Petronas. With Caltex and BHP, more powerful acceleration and less knocking.

But know, with the mileage >8,000km, seems like the type of fuel is more or less similar. Little or no more knocking with all types of fuel, even Petronas Primax.

I didn't try RON97 before. Perhaps I will try sometime. Do you pump RON97 everytime, or you just tried RON97 just for several times before switching to RON95?

Yes, I agree that the engine sounds slightly more refined wtih more mileage. My car is about 8,700km now. Still 1,300km to go before the 10,000km service, and I expect the performance from the engine to be better, more refined and smoother acceleration.
*
I believe, after some time the ECU "learns" the fuel you are using. In my case, after 30,000 km I used 2 full tanks of RON97. Right after fuel up, if feel the car somewhat lethargic (compared to when I 1st tried RON97 at <5000km mileage). The FC is good though. Only about 300 km after refuelling do I feel the RON97 giving better performance.

I guess the ECU needs to "relearn" to advance the ignition timing.

Butt dyno only, no scientific evidence or methodology.

P.S. Drex Chan (EA Autoworks) mentioned that if you install Race Chip, you need to drive at least 50 km for the ECU to take full advantage of it.
Khai RULE
post Dec 9 2013, 02:33 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
5 posts

Joined: Aug 2013
QUOTE(SportyHandling @ Dec 9 2013, 12:43 PM)
Yes, I have tried Petronas Primax, Caltex Techron and BHP only. When the mileage is lower, say between 1,000km to 8,000km, Caltex seems to provide a more powerful acceleration compared to Petronas. BHP is also good but Caltex feels great. The car seems to be less energetic ie. less powerful acceleration, coupled by engine knocking with Petronas. With Caltex and BHP, more powerful acceleration and less knocking.

But know, with the mileage >8,000km, seems like the type of fuel is more or less similar. Little or no more knocking with all types of fuel, even Petronas Primax.

I didn't try RON97 before. Perhaps I will try sometime. Do you pump RON97 everytime, or you just tried RON97 just for several times before switching to RON95?

Yes, I agree that the engine sounds slightly more refined wtih more mileage. My car is about 8,700km now. Still 1,300km to go before the 10,000km service, and I expect the performance from the engine to be better, more refined and smoother acceleration.
*
I fueled with RON97 when going for my occasional track day competition. The difference is instantaneous and obvious.

When go back to RON95 you can feel that CFE does take advantage of higher RON.

Fo me Knocking can be heard with All RON95 products but less on BHP and Esso.
mengsuan
post Dec 9 2013, 03:30 PM

9W2NNS
Group Icon
Staff
10,459 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong

Knocking on a modern engine?

I have heard knocking on my BOT Persona, my Preve is absent from such sound.
pizzaboyj
post Dec 9 2013, 04:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Klang | Shah Alam


Still no MT Preve owner? sad.gif
I have had my reservations about the CVT due to the whine etc. but it seems like the 2014 model is even more refined. still looking for non-CFE test drive though :/
vikneswaranc_17
post Dec 9 2013, 06:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
58 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
From: Serendah


just done trip to hat yai and songkhla yesterday.. more than 1300km in less than a week..
SportyHandling
post Dec 9 2013, 09:40 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
623 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(sanadi @ Dec 9 2013, 12:54 PM)
I believe, after some time the ECU "learns" the fuel you are using. In my case, after 30,000 km I used 2 full tanks of RON97. Right after fuel up, if feel the car somewhat lethargic (compared to when I 1st tried RON97 at <5000km mileage). The FC is good though. Only about 300 km after refuelling do I feel the RON97 giving better performance.

I guess the ECU needs to "relearn" to advance the ignition timing.

Butt dyno only, no scientific evidence or methodology.

P.S. Drex Chan (EA Autoworks) mentioned that if you install Race Chip, you need to drive at least 50 km for the ECU to take full advantage of it.
*
Okay thanks for the information. Maybe I will try RON97 sometime, after the 10,000km service.
SportyHandling
post Dec 9 2013, 09:42 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
623 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(Khai RULE @ Dec 9 2013, 02:33 PM)
I fueled with RON97 when going for my occasional track day competition. The difference is instantaneous and obvious.

When go back to RON95 you can feel that CFE does take advantage of higher RON.

Fo me Knocking can be heard with All RON95 products but less on BHP and Esso.
*
May I ask where is the place for this "track day competition"? Is it a racing circuit, something like F1?

Okay, will try RON97 sometime just for the fun of it since there are now two experiences that confirm the Preve Turbo to have better performance in engine power and acceleration with RON97.
lkyoong
post Dec 10 2013, 06:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
188 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(sanadi @ Dec 9 2013, 12:54 PM)
I believe, after some time the ECU "learns" the fuel you are using. In my case, after 30,000 km I used 2 full tanks of RON97. Right after fuel up, if feel the car somewhat lethargic (compared to when I 1st tried RON97 at <5000km mileage). The FC is good though. Only about 300 km after refuelling do I feel the RON97 giving better performance.

I guess the ECU needs to "relearn" to advance the ignition timing.

Butt dyno only, no scientific evidence or methodology.

P.S. Drex Chan (EA Autoworks) mentioned that if you install Race Chip, you need to drive at least 50 km for the ECU to take full advantage of it.
*
Can the Race Chip give better FC after install? They claim can get better FC but have my doubts because increase performance normally the FC will go up.

Seems no one on the forum have installed Race Chip or ones that have Race Chip installed at not on this forum.
sanadi
post Dec 10 2013, 07:46 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
9 posts

Joined: May 2012
QUOTE(lkyoong @ Dec 10 2013, 06:47 AM)
Can the Race Chip give better FC after install? They claim can get better FC but have my doubts because increase performance normally the FC will go up.

Seems no one on the forum have installed Race Chip or ones that have Race Chip installed at not on this forum.
*
Racechip claims 1 L/100km savings. Most on facebook say no much difference in FC.
lkyoong
post Dec 10 2013, 08:55 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
188 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(sanadi @ Dec 10 2013, 07:46 AM)
Racechip claims 1 L/100km savings. Most on facebook say no much difference in FC.
*
Like that i dun want to install Racechip as i am quite happy with the performance.

Rather use the money to change the noisy tires rclxms.gif
Khai RULE
post Dec 10 2013, 08:59 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
5 posts

Joined: Aug 2013
QUOTE(SportyHandling @ Dec 9 2013, 09:42 PM)
May I ask where is the place for this "track day competition"? Is it a racing circuit, something like F1?

Okay, will try RON97 sometime just for the fun of it since there are now two experiences that confirm the Preve Turbo to have better performance in engine power and acceleration with RON97.
*
You can check various competition below.

Superlap Battle

Ignition Track Day

Titan Time Attack

Preve is fun
Gigabit
post Dec 10 2013, 09:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Kay El


Hi Guys,

Had a scary experience yesterday. I went to Section 13 Service Centre to change the one way valve. All things went well when i went to test drive with the technician. Trouble started after i drove off the car from the SC. The car stalled at Jalan Semangat PJ for 30 mins. Then i manage to restart the car and drive and then it stall again in front of Jaya One and then drive again until it stall again at the junction entering the SC.

Malunya....ask the sc what happened, seems got error code at the ABCM.

On another note, change the quarter glass rubber sealant, dunno what happened but the eco tint was peeled off at the top of the quarter at the driver side. SC ask me to claim warranty from eco tint vendor using the warranty card. Is this right? Should claim damages from SC for damaging the tint. It was ok when i sent the car for rectification.
riezzien
post Dec 10 2013, 09:46 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
The eco tint vendor sure will ask u what happen until it got peeled off.
If its other human error where can claim warranty one.
Maybe u can ask first and if they say cannot, u ask them to write in a form of letter n den show to SC.
Then u claim tint voucher from SC. If they don want give, buat bising.
shit happens due to human clumsiness and owner have to bare the consequences..how nice.

Gigabit
post Dec 10 2013, 09:52 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Kay El


QUOTE(riezzien @ Dec 10 2013, 09:46 AM)
The eco tint vendor sure will ask u what happen until it got peeled off.
If its other human error where can claim warranty one.
Maybe u can ask first and if they say cannot, u ask them to write in a form of letter n den show to SC.
Then u claim tint voucher from SC. If they don want give, buat bising.
shit happens due to human clumsiness and owner have to bare the consequences..how nice.
*
Ini yang buat saya bengang, think need to speak directly with the service manager already.
mo66
post Dec 10 2013, 10:01 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
20 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(lkyoong @ Dec 10 2013, 08:55 AM)
Like that i dun want to install Racechip as i am quite happy with the performance.

Rather use the money to change the noisy tires  rclxms.gif
*
....

This post has been edited by mo66: Dec 10 2013, 11:01 PM
HeReLiSm
post Dec 10 2013, 10:18 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
488 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Shah Alam


QUOTE(sanadi @ Dec 10 2013, 07:46 AM)
Racechip claims 1 L/100km savings. Most on facebook say no much difference in FC.
*
how about grounding? anyone here did this grounding thing? some claimed the grounding can increased you FC, as well as the engine performance.
Khai RULE
post Dec 10 2013, 10:48 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
5 posts

Joined: Aug 2013
QUOTE(mo66 @ Dec 10 2013, 10:01 AM)
Try make a miniature size of that thing and stuck it on your nose. Can you breath better?

If better go ahead.
WilsonCheah
post Dec 10 2013, 11:55 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Ipoh


OHHHHH HAAAIIII EVERYBODIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
ayammmm backkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk!!!!!!!!!!
WilsonCheah
post Dec 10 2013, 11:59 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Ipoh


QUOTE(fendizaki @ Oct 1 2013, 04:04 PM)
user posted image

Yeap its a new color. biggrin.gif
*
yup new color, purplish dual color..saw it in ipoh alreadybut showroom car la


127 Pages « < 48 49 50 51 52 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0245sec    0.58    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 11:58 AM