QUOTE(gunzerdude @ Oct 18 2013, 04:17 AM)
Your arguments has their points, yet at the end of the day are you happy paying 6K for a D610 body which is just a rebranding of last year's camera while a consumer level body that is released just 1 week after contains more upgrades for 1/3rd of the price?
I'm neither happy nor bitter. I don't have a D600 and neither am I planning to get the D610. I choose to bit the bullet when D800 was at it's highest price. What to do? Price to pay for an early adopter. What does it have that others now have? Just looking at the current prices and the other available bodies alone is heartache.
For the D600 crowd, I would understand the unhappiness the D610 has caused. Instead of putting resources to solve the shutter problems on the D600, Nikon instead chooses to put the solution into a new body (D610) and charge users for it.
Also like you mentioned, Nikon is able to put a lot of tech in a D5300 for so much less money than compared to D610 and yet charge a bomb for an updated D600 in the guise of the D610. I guess they continue to use this pricing structure because both bodies cater to different markets.
QUOTE(gunzerdude @ Oct 18 2013, 04:17 AM)
It's not necessary to defend the brand when they are making obvious mistakes.
For me as a prospective FX upgrader it frustrates me that Nikon is capable of adding so much to the D610, yet chose to reserve upgrades for the D5300 instead.
Regardless of whether the upgrades makes a difference to my photography, I am paying that much more, is it not logical for me to expect more?
D610/D600 has a different targeted audience than with D5100/D5200/D5300. There was a survey done recently and I thought I read that Nikon and other big companies like Canon and Sony do not make so much profit on their high end systems. They make more profit on consumer products. So that partially explains your question why they choose to concentrate on consumer bodies like D5300 instead of D610 because as consumer products, they expect to sell more D5300 and try to please the bigger audience.
I know Nikon upgrade path is a little weird. They put newer tech on lower end body than they should on their higher end ones. I think it started on D700 time when they put the same AF module as they have on D3.
Anyway, I'm no camera designer but I suspect that putting in stuff like WiFi etc is a little complicated and would require a complete redesign due to space contraints. But then again, WiFi chips are very small.
QUOTE(gunzerdude @ Oct 18 2013, 04:17 AM)
Oh, btw the quote I highlighted above is by far the easiest mistake a company can make.
The response to the 6D should have been that they will look foward to implementing it in their future product, not proudly saying that "Our customers do not need WIFI" and also testing the intelligence of their prosumer base by saying that there is actually so much demand for a continuous quiet shutter and 0.5FPS increase in speed to warrant a "new" product.
Damage control? Not so much I think.

Their marketing and social media department needs a knock on the head sometimes.
Anyway, I merely mentioned that with all big manufacturers, there's bound to be an orphan child lemon product like this where the company is not proud off and that it's normal practice for big companies to do this. Nobody company is perfect. After sales service is always a non profit arm of the company and most of the time they are set up to please users. That's all.
QUOTE(dinozilla @ Oct 18 2013, 10:15 AM)
seriously??
I guess that's what the least they can offer...lol
but no written statement about this right?
just a verbal statement?
I don't think there will be a formal written statement. A written statement would mean admission to the D600 problem which they are not !
QUOTE(jepertine90 @ Oct 18 2013, 10:24 AM)
so much complain from sifu, make us the new comer(like myself) feel bad about their investment, and think twice in investing expensive lens.. lol
Investment itself always involves risk. Never risk free.
Calculated risk? Yes.
QUOTE(Andy214 @ Oct 18 2013, 10:41 AM)
Focusing speed (and accuracy) usually more concern for action/event photography.
Yeah, landscape shots would place importance to quality than AF speed.
By f/8, everything is in focus.
This post has been edited by jchue73: Oct 18 2013, 11:52 AM