Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
130 Pages « < 30 31 32 33 34 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.22, NEW RUMORE Nikon DF!

views
     
gerald7
post Oct 14 2013, 01:58 PM

r a n d o m l y
*******
Senior Member
2,453 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Kuching, Sarawakland


QUOTE(gunzerdude @ Oct 14 2013, 01:56 PM)
Yeah, bokeh part nikon/canon smoother since sigma's optical designs produces onion bokeh for some reason  hmm.gif

But that is really nitpicking lah, you won't notice unless you're a photographer also.

Of all macro lenses I only want two:

user posted image

user posted image

brows.gif  brows.gif  brows.gif  brows.gif  brows.gif

One for working distance and another for ultra-high magnification
*
My partner has the MPE65... is very hard to use. hahah I only try it once
Pro3363
post Oct 14 2013, 02:07 PM

Aiming high to stay flying
Group Icon
Elite
1,193 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
From: Miri, Sarawak



QUOTE(gunzerdude @ Oct 14 2013, 01:56 PM)
Yeah, bokeh part nikon/canon smoother since sigma's optical designs produces onion bokeh for some reason  hmm.gif

But that is really nitpicking lah, you won't notice unless you're a photographer also.

Of all macro lenses I only want two:

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


brows.gif  brows.gif  brows.gif  brows.gif  brows.gif

One for working distance and another for ultra-high magnification
*
My friend has the 200mm... brows.gif
gunzerdude
post Oct 14 2013, 02:15 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(gerald7 @ Oct 14 2013, 01:58 PM)
My partner has the MPE65... is very hard to use. hahah I only try it once
*
QUOTE(Pro3363 @ Oct 14 2013, 02:07 PM)
My friend has the 200mm... brows.gif
*
Wah, bloody hell, I jelly brows.gif

My 90mm can do both lah, just need to add on extension tubes+teleconverter to make it go to 5x only laugh.gif

Can't beat the 200mm for working distance though, love the feel of the lens wub.gif
little ice
post Oct 14 2013, 02:49 PM

PROFESSIONAL TROLL
*******
Senior Member
3,242 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From:
QUOTE(silrave @ Oct 14 2013, 02:57 AM)
lol
i think put p mode just tune the iso only
i tune few times keep on fail
then change to potrait and landscape
take till nice nice ^^
o O exposure
learn a new thing ^^
like water right i put shutter setting i put 1/100 iso to 1000-2000
i set the pic wont too bright but.....
i go upload pic ^^
*
learn to use the exposure compensation and metering mode. the default matrix metering will always "see" the whole scene and decide the exposure balance, and backlight scene will guarantee to be overexposed.

you can either +0.7 ~ +1.0 ev, or use center/spot metering where it'll only achieve balance exposure on the center portion, or the area within the spot if you choose in spot metering mode.

however, if you shoot backlight scene, you'll need to over expose the background, means you won't be able to see anything on the background if overexposed too much. alternatively, use a flash to "fill" or light up the subject, hence it's called "fill flash".

if want to shoot silky water trails, use slow shutter speed like 1/10 (usually 0.5 sec or longer), but will guarantee some blurred image cause not possible to achieve perfect sharpness due to handheld - people usually use tripod. if want to freeze the water movement, need to use fast shutter speed - use S mode, set the shutter speed you want, and let the camera do the rest...

This post has been edited by little ice: Oct 14 2013, 03:00 PM
TSAgito666
post Oct 14 2013, 02:55 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
QUOTE(NightFelix @ Oct 14 2013, 12:14 PM)
How to snap basic bokeh effect in entry-level DSLR? must use Prime Lens? hmm.gif
*
once again i dig back my 70-300 NON-VR lens and 18-70 kit lens photo test shot ...from 2 years ago...
this bokeh good enough? blush.gif

70-300 non VR
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


18-70 kit lens
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

little ice
post Oct 14 2013, 02:59 PM

PROFESSIONAL TROLL
*******
Senior Member
3,242 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From:
QUOTE(NightFelix @ Oct 14 2013, 12:14 PM)
How to snap basic bokeh effect in entry-level DSLR? must use Prime Lens? hmm.gif
*
3 criterias to achieve bokeh:

1) closer to subject
2) longer focal length
3) bigger aperture
TSAgito666
post Oct 14 2013, 03:02 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
updated first post with beginner guide wink.gif

http://www.nikon-asia.com/en_Asia/learn_an...eway.page?lang=

unsure.gif
piscesguy
post Oct 14 2013, 03:04 PM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,965 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(5p3ak @ Oct 14 2013, 08:50 AM)
tis one got PP ar?  hmm.gif

how they always get the skin tone so nice...
*
Just smooth skin. biggrin.gif

The exposure and colour are straight from camera. brows.gif
5p3ak
post Oct 14 2013, 03:06 PM

CPE, FIG Certified Gymnastics Coach
*******
Senior Member
5,648 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
From: Jalan Tijani
QUOTE(piscesguy @ Oct 14 2013, 03:04 PM)
Just smooth skin. biggrin.gif

The exposure and colour are straight from camera. brows.gif
*
Fuuu...mcm baby punya skin oh
celciuz
post Oct 14 2013, 03:12 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(gunzerdude @ Oct 14 2013, 11:37 AM)
He is a real newbie to this la, so one step at a time  sweat.gif
This is just sales tactic to tipu you into getting an expensive accessory, the UV filters in most shops have one of the highest profit margins, hence the encouragement by salespeople to get you to buy them.

A filter is mostly just there for protection against direct impact to the front element, while specialized filters like circular-polarizers and neutral density types are for certain types of photography uses.

Higher quality UV filters won't degrade your photo but personally I haven't seen a massive difference between a RM20 and a RM200 one yet (both multicoated btw).
*
Back then I used Kenko (also known as Hoya) single coat on my 18-105, getting shit load of flare contributed by filter as compared to Hoya HD/B+W XS-Pro/B+W XS-Pro Nano at the moment.

My view is, either you go commando, or get a quality filter.
gunzerdude
post Oct 14 2013, 03:14 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(little ice @ Oct 14 2013, 02:49 PM)
learn to use the exposure compensation and metering mode. the default matrix metering will always "see" the whole scene and decide the exposure balance, and backlight scene will guarantee to be overexposed.

you can either +0.7 ~ +1.0 ev, or use center/spot metering where it'll only achieve balance exposure on the center portion, or the area within the spot if you choose in spot metering mode.

however, if you shoot backlight scene, you'll need to over expose the background, means you won't be able to see anything on the background if overexposed too much. alternatively, use a flash to "fill" or light up the subject, hence it's called "fill flash".

if want to shoot silky water trails, use slow shutter speed like 1/10 (usually 0.5 sec or longer), but will guarantee some blurred image cause not possible to achieve perfect sharpness due to handheld - people usually use tripod. if want to freeze the water movement, need to use fast shutter speed - use S mode, set the shutter speed you want, and let the camera do the rest...
*
Too much jargon and information for a newcomer to process lah sweat.gif

Like I said, one step at a time lol, he already pushed us to V22 because you guys keep overloading him with more info than he really needs. laugh.gif

This post has been edited by gunzerdude: Oct 14 2013, 03:14 PM
Kookie10
post Oct 14 2013, 03:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
158 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


Type of camera/lens/accesories : Unsure
Budget: Less than RM2.5k but as low as possible
Preferable brand : Unsure
Type of photography u want to do : New to photography
Any specific features u want? : No idea at all but got attracted by the lightweight Canon 100D

I am new to photography and have been using the simply point and shoot camera for quite sometime. But that camera is an old model and i realize that recently a lot of brands have come out with "compact" cameras that have DLSR quality such as the sony E-mount series. I'm unsure of what does those camera has to offer as compared with DLSR. So i have a few questions:

1. Why choose DLSR over those like Sony E-mount series?

2. What are the differences across brand like Canon/Nikon/Sony?

3. What are the entry models for newbies?

Thanks =)

Sorry for the post here as no one seems to reply in the recommendation post. Please help sifus =)
gunzerdude
post Oct 14 2013, 03:22 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(celciuz @ Oct 14 2013, 03:12 PM)
Back then I used Kenko (also known as Hoya) single coat on my 18-105, getting shit load of flare contributed by filter as compared to Hoya HD/B+W XS-Pro/B+W XS-Pro Nano at the moment.

My view is, either you go commando, or get a quality filter.
*
Oh yeah, flare performance is one of the main differences lah. Forgot to mention laugh.gif
But better quality ones like JYC PRO1-D which costs around 50bucks can already match the flare performance of B+W filters, tested side by side brows.gif

Can see the cheaper quality filter's coatings are quite dull, while higher quality coatings have a glossy sheen similar to the coatings on the actual lenses themselves.
jepertine90
post Oct 14 2013, 03:48 PM

Dean Chan
*****
Senior Member
869 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Big pot heated with Hell's Fire


QUOTE(gunzerdude @ Oct 14 2013, 11:37 AM)
He is a real newbie to this la, so one step at a time  sweat.gif
This is just sales tactic to tipu you into getting an expensive accessory, the UV filters in most shops have one of the highest profit margins, hence the encouragement by salespeople to get you to buy them.

A filter is mostly just there for protection against direct impact to the front element, while specialized filters like circular-polarizers and neutral density types are for certain types of photography uses.

Higher quality UV filters won't degrade your photo but personally I haven't seen a massive difference between a RM20 and a RM200 one yet (both multicoated btw).
*
So did you sifu use a cheap one or some sort expensive one to protect??
gunzerdude
post Oct 14 2013, 03:52 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(jepertine90 @ Oct 14 2013, 03:48 PM)
So did you sifu use a cheap one or some sort expensive one to protect??
*
Both cheap and moderately expensive filters also got, the JYC PRO1-D I mentioned above is one of the latter. brows.gif

And no I'm not a sifu, I'm just a hobbyist saja~ icon_rolleyes.gif
jepertine90
post Oct 14 2013, 03:59 PM

Dean Chan
*****
Senior Member
869 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Big pot heated with Hell's Fire


QUOTE(gunzerdude @ Oct 14 2013, 03:52 PM)
Both cheap and moderately expensive filters also got, the JYC PRO1-D I mentioned above is one of the latter.  brows.gif

And no I'm not a sifu, I'm just a hobbyist saja~  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
learned alot, if not edi kena potong by sales man.. haha gonna head to mutiara there and find this and test out see.. smile.gif
little ice
post Oct 14 2013, 04:53 PM

PROFESSIONAL TROLL
*******
Senior Member
3,242 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From:
QUOTE(gunzerdude @ Oct 14 2013, 03:14 PM)
Too much jargon and information for a newcomer to process lah  sweat.gif

Like I said, one step at a time lol, he already pushed us to V22 because you guys keep overloading him with more info than he really needs. laugh.gif
*
lol let him slow slow digest. biggrin.gif

by the way i learn all these by reading online free articles, as well as trial and error. in fact when one understand the basic exposure, the rest of the problem silrave faced can be solved easily, those are pretty basic troubleshooting.
gnome
post Oct 14 2013, 05:12 PM

- We game, do you? -
*******
Senior Member
4,925 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
user posted image

lol @ background laugh.gif
devilfather
post Oct 14 2013, 05:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
58 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(gnome @ Oct 14 2013, 05:12 PM)
user posted image

lol @ background laugh.gif
*
i wish i was at KL those period....~~
devilfather
post Oct 14 2013, 05:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
58 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
going for flash.... and advice or model?? i know that nikon ori flash very expensive... worth or not to get 1??
The reason of thinking to get a flash is because going to decrease the value of ISO to get a clearer photo indoor...
and TTL flash are important right.. but TTL and wireless are not related right?

130 Pages « < 30 31 32 33 34 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0292sec    1.29    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 10:36 PM