Me? Always around. Just not frequent enough to be top poster. 
Yeah, a bit like PC Fair. But nowadays they incorporate a lot of photography talks and a bit of photo exhibition from pros. Good for beginners.

If I'm not wrong, that's also the time when Nikon gives free sensor cleaning.
Must be injured? These kingfishers need 600mm at least on FF to get a decent capture. Most of the time, have to crop. They make a distinctive call and I always know when they are around. They always perch on the tree branch at the back of my old house. Not the best perching branch. They are also very skittish and will fly at the very sight of a human.

My heavily cropped shots;

Higher end bodies from D7000 and above uses a pentaprism design for the viewfinder instead of mirrors in lower end bodies, so should be kinda hard for dust to enter what. 

Since the pentaprism is enssentially a chunk of glass blocking the way already, plus there's also the focusing screen too, unless the viewfinder glass is not properly sealed la. 

guys wanna ask some problem is
http://www.flickr.com/photos/104383554@N05/10149351283/
my camera like this is it ok?
is it shutter speed setting or change memory card better
currently class 4 16gb

Morning. Im in the wedding photography business. Do you guys think upgrading my D700 to D800 worth it?

With MB-D10 battery grip, yes.
I think we only need to worry about diffraction when shooting landscape. But even then on wide angles, f/8 will already get you everything is focus.

If really on the limit of DoF like say on macro subjects, use focus stacking. Nowadays with Camranger and Ipad, you have a nice way of viewing on a big screen while selecting / shooting different focus points and best part without touching / moving your camera setup for perfect stacking.

For bright day time sports when using slow shutter speed, no choice but to invest in a 2 or 3 stop ND filter.
Can get all at one go what...    Painful but only one time. 
Why? No filter?
Just get f/1.4 trinity. 

24mm f/1.4
35mm f/1.4
85mm f/1.4

Don't know about you but mirrorless quality still leaves me wanting more. Especially after paying so much for it.

If really want to save the back, I would rather forgo everything and simply rely on a cili padi like the Sony RX100. Really light weight and relatively superb performance from a small sensor.
Unfortunately, there's no free lunch with the TC2 especially on a zoom. You get decent performance when paired with primes like the 200, 300 etc.

Another option for long lens is to go for the new AF-S 80-400mm. Focus is quite fast. Apparently performs better than 70-200mm + TC2. But it's a whopping RM 7k plus. 

I believe Albert posts some samples of it from time to time.

He is a real newbie to this la, so one step at a time 
This is just sales tactic to tipu you into getting an expensive accessory, the UV filters in most shops have one of the highest profit margins, hence the encouragement by salespeople to get you to buy them.

A filter is mostly just there for protection against direct impact to the front element, while specialized filters like circular-polarizers and neutral density types are for certain types of photography uses.

Higher quality UV filters won't degrade your photo but personally I haven't seen a massive difference between a RM20 and a RM200 one yet (both multicoated btw).

Oh yeah, flare performance is one of the main differences lah. Forgot to mention
But better quality ones like JYC PRO1-D which costs around 50bucks can already match the flare performance of B+W filters, tested side by side 

Can see the cheaper quality filter's coatings are quite dull, while higher quality coatings have a glossy sheen similar to the coatings on the actual lenses themselves.

The glass supplier for the JYC's PRO1D model is Hoya also. Used for two years+ on my 17-50, did several comparisons with another guy's 17-50 with a B+W filter and another expensive brand which I forgot d, can't find any difference, neither sharpness nor flare.

A7r 36MP AA-less is real.

A7


A7r

nope, A7r is $2200 body only, expected to be around RM7000+, a lot cheaper than D800e.

A7 is $1700 so around RM5499 or more. though it's more like RX1 than RX1R cause got AA filter.

yes A7r is cheaper than RX1 but it's body only, add a lens that's comparable with the RX1 will shot right up to RM10k+.

RX1 is still a different concept, some people like me will like the RX1 concept and am enjoying it, no regret even knowing FF mirrorless going to be out anytime, i'm not into interchangeable lens thingy anymore cause it'll only means spending more money. moreover RX1 is only 500g the whole package, while A7 already 500g (still waiting for official spec) without lens. i want max IQ with a versatile prime and lightest possible combo.

Eww... 

So how did you clean it? Using any cloth on it will be like rubbing sand paper on the glass. 

Trying to replicate a TV aerial silhouette that I found on tumblr months ago. But the original have birds on it which makes it more interesting.


The telecommunication by NurAzam, on Flickr