Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Proton Suprima S
|
kevintth
|
Aug 23 2013, 01:30 AM
|
|
QUOTE(dares @ Aug 23 2013, 12:11 AM)   When she ask you what other carmaker use the same turbo, just point to any VW car on the road (except Polo Sedan). Same supplier, BorgWarner. Haha right. .. she sounds like turbo engine from proton 1 is lousy compare to the one install from those ah beng shop Well this im not sure... And she dont trust at all a milo tin car can get 5 star. .. hahahaa. .. lazy to talk to this kind of ppl
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shawnzz
|
Aug 23 2013, 05:06 AM
|
|
QUOTE(kevintth @ Aug 22 2013, 11:09 PM) haha... dont ever dream it. even Camry also dun have that specs like in Suprima S... i guess more than 200k to get that specs if it is from Toyota Yesterday my colleague asked me er that Proton recently launched a new car with turbo hoh... why so lauya (bad) 1 what turbo is it so slow 1 no other maker use it pun.... then ask me the price.. i said RM80k.. she was surprise.... expensive la.. better get branded oversea car  ... ok fine i say if i have that 80k i sure get Suprima S.. .then she asked me why le? I explain a little bit more why it is 80k... i said this car has 6 airbags leh... safety rating got 5 star ... awarded from Australia not local 1 .... vios mana ada.... guess what she said... the 5 stars must be from kopi $$$$  fine.. nothing to say seriously!!! politic issue really does affect the Proton name a lot.. I'm not surprised the 5 star is from $$. This is Malaysia, anything can happen. Just look at our GE
|
|
|
|
|
|
VagueConcerns
|
Aug 23 2013, 05:55 AM
|
|
QUOTE(kevintth @ Aug 23 2013, 01:30 AM) Haha right. .. she sounds like turbo engine from proton 1 is lousy compare to the one install from those ah beng shop Well this im not sure... And she dont trust at all a milo tin car can get 5 star. .. hahahaa. .. lazy to talk to this kind of ppl Yeah, just because it has a "turbo" doesn't mean it was made to be a devil's chariot. The turbo is tamer, that's it. It doesn't lag, it doesn't produce excess power (and wasting fuel), it did good for a bit of overtaking and hill climb....at least from my experience, comparing it to a Waja CPS. From specs at least the CFE isn't consuming a whole lot of extra fuel for an extra 13hp, and much much much more torque. That being said, my only complaint so far with the Suprima S without ever driving it nor looking at it in the flesh, is the daft "Turbo" label at the back. Stick with just CFE like the Preve, because we all know it won't be close to other real hot hatches with 200++ horsepower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSkimsim
|
Aug 23 2013, 07:55 AM
|
|
QUOTE(VagueConcerns @ Aug 23 2013, 05:55 AM) Yeah, just because it has a "turbo" doesn't mean it was made to be a devil's chariot. The turbo is tamer, that's it. It doesn't lag, it doesn't produce excess power (and wasting fuel), it did good for a bit of overtaking and hill climb....at least from my experience, comparing it to a Waja CPS. From specs at least the CFE isn't consuming a whole lot of extra fuel for an extra 13hp, and much much much more torque. That being said, my only complaint so far with the Suprima S without ever driving it nor looking at it in the flesh, is the daft "Turbo" label at the back. Stick with just CFE like the Preve, because we all know it won't be close to other real hot hatches with 200++ horsepower. More Vroom & more you die, after warranty then pay more on turbo kit..
|
|
|
|
|
|
mat79
|
Aug 23 2013, 07:58 AM
|
|
based on some info i got. they slap turbo rather than cfe coz market survey showing that many common malaysia dont notice cfe is turbo engine,but they notice that preve is big n heavy,they skeptical on how 1.6 l engine to haul a big n heavy car. they thought that its the same powerplant that inside persona,gen2, flx se n etc.
turbo word is easier to reach the masses. not all are car enthusiast.
my pov,they still can do it through informing it in ads n etc. but turbo is easier to explain. no need to explain actually,even grandma can understand the word :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
dares
|
Aug 23 2013, 08:18 AM
|
|
QUOTE(mat79 @ Aug 23 2013, 07:58 AM) based on some info i got. they slap turbo rather than cfe coz market survey showing that many common malaysia dont notice cfe is turbo engine,but they notice that preve is big n heavy,they skeptical on how 1.6 l engine to haul a big n heavy car. they thought that its the same powerplant that inside persona,gen2, flx se n etc. turbo word is easier to reach the masses. not all are car enthusiast. my pov,they still can do it through informing it in ads n etc. but turbo is easier to explain. no need to explain actually,even grandma can understand the word :-) Proton very poor understanding in branding. They should persevere make the "CFE" branding their own, like TSI and Ecoboost, and advertise that it is turbocharged, instead of panicking and revert back to a ahbeng "Turbo" label. Consumers will eventually get the CFE = turbocharged connection. Same goes for the flip-flop-ing between "Proton R&H" and "Lotus R&H", and changing the Preve name to Suprima. You'll end up confusing people instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
edison1437
|
Aug 23 2013, 08:23 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Gouki @ Aug 22 2013, 06:33 PM) The only worth buying among the cars you mentioned is Forte and Jazz, but given the price, size, performance, handling and features. Suprima still a good buy. I have a 2004 waja at home. no major problems. mind to tell what is your problem?  magnifying power window problem QUOTE(AlexLee277 @ Aug 22 2013, 10:04 PM) hi, my advise?  HAHAHAHA there was a Teacher of Jay named Alex you are the one? This post has been edited by edison1437: Aug 23 2013, 08:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
mystvearn
|
Aug 23 2013, 08:49 AM
|
|
QUOTE(dares @ Aug 23 2013, 08:18 AM) Proton very poor understanding in branding. They should persevere make the "CFE" branding their own, like TSI and Ecoboost, and advertise that it is turbocharged, instead of panicking and revert back to a ahbeng "Turbo" label. Consumers will eventually get the CFE = turbocharged connection. Same goes for the flip-flop-ing between "Proton R&H" and "Lotus R&H", and changing the Preve name to Suprima. You'll end up confusing people instead. This is called, removing DSZ legacy...
|
|
|
|
|
|
dares
|
Aug 23 2013, 08:51 AM
|
|
QUOTE(mystvearn @ Aug 23 2013, 08:49 AM) This is called, removing DSZ legacy... Well then that sucks
|
|
|
|
|
|
mystvearn
|
Aug 23 2013, 09:59 AM
|
|
QUOTE(dares @ Aug 23 2013, 08:51 AM) Well then that sucks  Fortunately I don't work in Proton, I can say this. If Lotus R&H, Turbo gone long time, only come back after DSZ is gone, that is the case. SNR3 2011 does not have Lotus R&H. R3 badge enough already to say that is Proton R&H. On another note, you will see non-core cars which will cater to all the market soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kevintth
|
Aug 23 2013, 09:59 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Shawnzz @ Aug 23 2013, 05:06 AM) I'm not surprised the 5 star is from $$. This is Malaysia, anything can happen. Just look at our GE Got video for the crash test. And it was tested in Australia. If I am not mistaken simply publish or mislead ppl with that kind of fake / unrealistic info... then wait for the lawsuit. Australia is not your motherland can simply give kopi $$$ to get whatever you want right... I read somewhere was regarding Proton Savvy in Taiwan, they got sued due to unrealistic result of fuel consumption published on the ads. QUOTE(mat79 @ Aug 23 2013, 07:58 AM) based on some info i got. they slap turbo rather than cfe coz market survey showing that many common malaysia dont notice cfe is turbo engine,but they notice that preve is big n heavy,they skeptical on how 1.6 l engine to haul a big n heavy car. they thought that its the same powerplant that inside persona,gen2, flx se n etc. turbo word is easier to reach the masses. not all are car enthusiast. my pov,they still can do it through informing it in ads n etc. but turbo is easier to explain. no need to explain actually,even grandma can understand the word :-) this was exactly i thought before haha... I prefer they better stick to CFE... nicer name than the TURBO... keep it low profile better to avoid ppl call it a lame turbo engine from proton
|
|
|
|
|
|
mystvearn
|
Aug 23 2013, 10:04 AM
|
|
QUOTE(mat79 @ Aug 23 2013, 07:58 AM) based on some info i got. they slap turbo rather than cfe coz market survey showing that many common malaysia dont notice cfe is turbo engine,but they notice that preve is big n heavy,they skeptical on how 1.6 l engine to haul a big n heavy car. they thought that its the same powerplant that inside persona,gen2, flx se n etc. turbo word is easier to reach the masses. not all are car enthusiast. my pov,they still can do it through informing it in ads n etc. but turbo is easier to explain. no need to explain actually,even grandma can understand the word :-) Then just put there, 1.6T for turbo, 1.6, non-turbo. Easy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSruffstuff
|
Aug 23 2013, 10:07 AM
|
|
QUOTE(mystvearn @ Aug 23 2013, 10:04 AM) Then just put there, 1.6T for turbo, 1.6, non-turbo. Easy. 1.6 still got people confuse Proton engine always 1.6. Old tech engine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kadajawi
|
Aug 23 2013, 10:26 AM
|
|
QUOTE(cloudstrife07 @ Aug 23 2013, 12:59 AM) yep govt policy, but there's give and take for it. take these 2 situation: 1. expensive car to buy, petrol cheap, roadtax cheap, insurance cheap (not categorize according to CO2), no parking tax, car no need dispose after 5 years, every 3 years + 1 year every year no need go mandatory puspakom check then only can lulus roadtax vs. 2. cheap car, petrol 1 liter RM4, roadtax expensive, insurance according to car CO2, must present parking lot certificate then only can buy car, need dispose car after 5 years, every 3 + subsequent year most mandatory puspakom check, petrol need to scout the cheapest petrol station the 2nd one is the policy of most developed countries like Japan and UK. which one will u prefer? No need to dispose a car after 5 years in Europe. It just becomes more expensive to run as cleaner cars are introduced. Also the car needs to be in good condition. But you can easily drive your car for 50 years, if you want to. Also petrol in Europe is at RM 6-7  I prefer the second system. It leads to better air quality and fewer dangerous cars on the road, including your own vehicle. You always can fix the car so it becomes roadworthy again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dares
|
Aug 23 2013, 10:38 AM
|
|
Saw some forumers comparing Kia Rio and Fiesta to the Suprima S and comment that the Proton is overpriced because Rio/Fiesta ave 6 airbags or more as well as ESC.
They seemed so focus on the specs that they forgot Suprima is a C-segment while Rio/Fiesta is B-segment, while Forte 1.6 SX which is also C-segment is not as well spec-ed and is 4-star ANCAP.
Right now you need to pay around RM100k or more for a Korean C-segment with similiar specs.
This post has been edited by dares: Aug 23 2013, 10:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leo the Lion
|
Aug 23 2013, 11:04 AM
|
|
QUOTE(mat79 @ Aug 23 2013, 08:58 AM) based on some info i got. they slap turbo rather than cfe coz market survey showing that many common malaysia dont notice cfe is turbo engine,but they notice that preve is big n heavy,they skeptical on how 1.6 l engine to haul a big n heavy car. they thought that its the same powerplant that inside persona,gen2, flx se n etc. turbo word is easier to reach the masses. not all are car enthusiast. my pov,they still can do it through informing it in ads n etc. but turbo is easier to explain. no need to explain actually,even grandma can understand the word :-) I understand why proton slap turbo badge BECAUSE they want to attract the customer. But it would be better if its "CFE Turbo" badge instead of "Turbo".
|
|
|
|
|
|
kadajawi
|
Aug 23 2013, 11:06 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Shawnzz @ Aug 23 2013, 05:06 AM) I'm not surprised the 5 star is from $$. This is Malaysia, anything can happen. Just look at our GE The results are from Australia though, where other Proron models didn't do well. And the Saga there had a similar result to the similar spec Saga SV tested in Malaysia. The results are correct. They should have advertised more that CFE means turbo. This post has been edited by kadajawi: Aug 23 2013, 11:08 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
theanswer
|
Aug 23 2013, 11:51 AM
|
|
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Aug 23 2013, 10:07 AM) 1.6 still got people confuse Proton engine always 1.6. Old tech engine.  what to do? haters will always hate. frankly proton is a problematic car..but plus point they offer a good solid handling. i dont think most driver can differentiate handling characteristic. all they know is the brand..start and drive.
|
|
|
|
|