Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
13 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.21, D610 and D5300 kambing soon!?

views
     
gunzerdude
post Aug 9 2013, 02:11 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


Did a photoshoot for my gf and her friends yesterday biggrin.gif

user posted image
gunzerdude
post Aug 9 2013, 05:05 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Aug 9 2013, 04:29 PM)
Lighting on the right side seems more brighter compared on the left though...

Good Job anyways  rclxms.gif
*
Yep, right side is 1/2 while left is 1/8 biggrin.gif

It did blow out the right girl's shirt abit though, at least I can still pull some back in post doh.gif
gunzerdude
post Aug 10 2013, 12:40 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(Human Nature @ Aug 9 2013, 11:57 PM)
^ Thank you. That is pretty much a clear and simple to understand explanation.

The last sentence could be the reason why my pictures are not bright, no flash mode but taken at outdoor (sunny). However, the +/- Exposure Indicator is 0.0

Another thing that I don't understand is, under M mode, the Exposure Indicator bar (viewfinder) is at the extreme side of -ve. Is this the reason why my pictures are not bright, even under 'no flash' mode mentioned above? I thought the settings under M mode is independent and will not affect other setting (no flash, P mode, etc)?

Thank you
*
The camera is programmed to darken the photo if there are obvious bright areas in the photo (assuming you're using matrix metering) such as a sun or sky.

The same happens at night where the camera tries to brighten the photo when it sees lots of dark areas.

P mode and EV compensation is where you step in by biasing this so that the camera captures what you want to see.
gunzerdude
post Aug 10 2013, 01:06 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Aug 10 2013, 12:52 AM)
Thanks for sharing guys!
Sifus memang sifus  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif

I've always thought P mode = Auto mode without flash LOL  doh.gif
I was just wondering, do you guys often use spot metering?
Apart from when one wants to blow out the background (Which i think can be done through editing if taken in RAW), I don't really know when else to use it lol... summore I always forget to put it back after changing it  doh.gif
*
Spot metering is used when you want a particular spot in the photo to have the correct exposure while ignoring the rest of the photo's lighting.

Say for example you have a person's face against a bright sky. If you want just the person's face to be correctly exposed you'll be using spot metering on the face.

Otherwise you'll probably end up with a silhouette against a properly exposed sky.

user posted image
gunzerdude
post Aug 10 2013, 01:25 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Aug 10 2013, 01:18 AM)
Thanks for the input bro~
Ya I know how it works haha..
The thing is even with matrix metering and getting shot 3 above, if taken in RAW I would still be able to "produce" shot 2, and even shot 1 haha...
So I was just wondering whether the differences are significant or not  hmm.gif

I think I've read somewhere that spot metering will be good for white clothing under bright sunlight too, but never tried it out yet  hmm.gif
*
Normally you'd want to get the right exposure in camera instead of trying to correct this in post la.

If you leave exposure to chance you risk loosing detail in bright or dark areas if the camera can not evaluate the scene properly enough.
gunzerdude
post Aug 10 2013, 10:49 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted imageuser posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image

This post has been edited by gunzerdude: Aug 10 2013, 11:03 PM
gunzerdude
post Aug 10 2013, 11:41 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Aug 10 2013, 11:22 PM)
Your gf paling cantik! biased photographer! haha XD Just kidding just kidding~~
*
LOL, surprisingly the first photo was the most popular when they used it as their profile picca.

Have more that I'll upload soon. brows.gif
gunzerdude
post Aug 10 2013, 11:47 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(teetaatee @ Aug 10 2013, 11:45 PM)
user posted image
messy hair  sad.gif
and the last pic, her hair is covering half of her right eye
*
Hahah, you'll have to excuse me for that, I don't have a hairdresser on standby laugh.gif

I think the hair is nice enough la personally. Although I'm sure you'll be able to take better ones should you be there with me thumbup.gif
gunzerdude
post Aug 10 2013, 11:54 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(teetaatee @ Aug 10 2013, 11:50 PM)
lol.. u can ask her to pin up her hair if necessary, just less than a minute will do  laugh.gif
and try to pp with some tone, make the photo more impact. just my 2 cent  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
hmm.gif hmmm.... Still not familiar with the toning and all, I lack judgement when it comes to color tones for some reason, guess I'm still not that sensitive to colors yet laugh.gif

Maybe we can meet up sometime so you can teach me in person? I'd definitely appreciate more input on what I can do better.

About the hair, yeah, I do realise that too brows.gif But sadly I didnt notice during the shot and this one was the best of her doing this pose. sweat.gif
gunzerdude
post Aug 11 2013, 12:06 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(teetaatee @ Aug 10 2013, 11:57 PM)
i was like that too when started studio type of portrait, didnt notice all the small thingy, but thats very important yo
is she still fresh in posing?
toning wise, how i learn for myself, im using lightroom then i downloaded many preset from net, from there i can see their adjustment, then i slowly make mine or modify from the preset
*
I see, these girls all have no experience in posing, I'm the one directing them for the poses, although I only know basics, can't seem make their poses real enough to have meaning in the final shots yet. There's still something missing whenever I look at my shots. hmm.gif

Thanks for the input though, will definitely try to notice small details like these in the future biggrin.gif
I downloaded a huge collection of presets, but haven't really been around to use them yet. laugh.gif
gunzerdude
post Aug 11 2013, 12:21 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(teetaatee @ Aug 11 2013, 12:16 AM)
time needed lol to test out those preset... haha
posing can learn, ask them to go to www.moko.cc for reference, i always get idea from there
cuz last time i was a assistant photographer, kena cucuk kao kao if didnt notice those small details.. haha
your lighting is kind of normal one.. u can try the flash from their top, of cuz need to use softbox, and provided u have the stand that tall enough to mount ur flash  biggrin.gif
*
Lols, actually I do have the equipment necessary do to that already.

I have a 5 meter boom stand and a 60x60 softbox and 80x80 softbox. Have an umbrella type 60x90 one too
Only thing missing is a backdrop to be honest. sweat.gif

Wow, shocking.gif That is a fantastic link you just gave me man, definitely bookmarking this for future use. Thanks alot!! notworthy.gif
gunzerdude
post Aug 11 2013, 12:32 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Aug 11 2013, 12:19 AM)
I understand what you mean bro haha XD Most of my shots lack the "natural feel" as well, though to be honest its not really obvious in your shots la  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif
Most people are not trained like professional models, and will definitely become unnatural once the camera is aimed at them  laugh.gif

One of the best ways to shoot is to ask them to go about their business while you shoot, the shots will be more natural (even though the models will most probably hate them! XD).. but even this also depends on the cooperativeness and also chemistry between the subjects i.e. your gf and her friends.. Some groups get along super well, and are thus very easy to work with.. some do not  tongue.gif

I often use a lot of presets, but sometimes its best to not use any, particularly for ones like your present set of photos (strobes + white blackground), unless its a preset with very minor change of color tones. Just my 2 cents though haha  tongue.gif
*
Yeah, to be honest I don't want pro models to be my subjects, since my aim is to bring out the best light and life from normal people like my gf and her friends.

I understand part of the reason that there's something missing is the communication between me and my subjects. Since it is me who is directing them through the shots.

If I make them comfortable enough or otherwise, it shows in the photos. Therefore I gotta brush up my social skills too brows.gif

One reason I haven't really gotten around to using presets is I don't really know which suits what photo and all that. And also because I see photographers abusing it to the point where the effect takes center of attention, disappointing really doh.gif

About natural shots, I do ask them to do funny stuff, here's the few that I've already had up online biggrin.gif

user posted imageuser posted image
user posted image

user posted image
gunzerdude
post Aug 11 2013, 12:34 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(teetaatee @ Aug 11 2013, 12:30 AM)
yea.. u got all the tools, why not trying out some new thing? backdrop just use white wall la.. haha
sure u have to bookmark that link laugh.gif alot of thing inside, and to learn as well
*
Because the shot was kinda fast paced, had a few hours to do everything, no time to experiment so I just went ahead with what I know works. Two umbrellas left and right and a boom stand with a softbox on the top. sweat.gif

QUOTE(teetaatee @ Aug 11 2013, 12:32 AM)
not sifu la..
yea.. very annoying indeed, u will like "fu*k, why i didnt notice just now"  laugh.gif
*
Exactly, memang doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif sometimes when there's a major fault and you don't notice it till post

This post has been edited by gunzerdude: Aug 11 2013, 12:36 AM
gunzerdude
post Aug 11 2013, 12:56 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(teetaatee @ Aug 11 2013, 12:42 AM)
Can always ask ur gf to be ur model anytime when u got free time to try out the diff type of lighting
*
Yeah, she's been a great help to my improvements in the past two years especially with portraits, dunno what I'd do without her icon_rolleyes.gif

QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Aug 11 2013, 12:43 AM)
I totally agree with you on the 1st sentence thumbup.gif I prefer helping people I know to create memories too  rclxms.gif

Haha, don't be too hard on yourself mate, sometimes its not just about you la haha... if you have me as a model you'll have a tough day too since my expressions are all very fake one  laugh.gif  laugh.gif

Again, great photos man. I like the one where they all hide behind sofa one (not uploaded here i think)  thumbup.gif Cute~
*
Hehe, as they say, without some sort of goal to look forward to, it's hard to motivate yourself to improve.

whistling.gif having a difficult subject is one thing, but I still feel that the photographer's charisma is still quite important in bringing out a subject's true colors.

What you see frozen in that slice of time, is that connection between the photographer and his subject.
I look up video tutorials, and some of the more prominent ones like peter hurley and sue bryce produce really inspiring works.



Oh yeah, that sofa shot laugh.gif That's their idea, not mine. It's a pretty interesting shot though I must say
user posted image


This post has been edited by gunzerdude: Aug 11 2013, 12:57 AM
gunzerdude
post Aug 12 2013, 12:17 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(teetaatee @ Aug 11 2013, 11:18 PM)
i want to ask something
if u are a photog from a studio, u work for them
then after u shoot for the customer, the photos are belong to u or the studio?
*
If you are hired by the studio, then legally the photos are owned by the studio.
gunzerdude
post Aug 12 2013, 08:43 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(rickyro @ Aug 12 2013, 06:08 PM)
I found this news on facebook claiming that there are fake Nikon DSLR on the market!!! https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=571...&type=1&theater
*
hmm.gif hmm.gif

I kinda doubt the possibility of being able to fake a DSLR, even an old model.
gunzerdude
post Aug 13 2013, 10:42 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(seather @ Aug 13 2013, 10:37 AM)
user posted image

Anyone got USD82700 to spare? tongue.gif

This ‘Complete Set’ of Nikon DSLR Gear Will Only Set You Back $82,700

Want a “complete set” of Nikon DSLR equipment without having to buy each of the lenses individually? The Japanese camera shop Map Camera is offering a sale on a massive Nikon kit containing a Nikon D4 and 20 different Nikkor N lenses. All you need is $82,700.

According to the helpful robotic minds at Google Translate, the name of the package is the “Nikon Chivalrous Nanocrystals Complete Set.” That seems a bit strange, so we’re guessing the name makes a little more sense than that in Japanese.

user posted image

Here’s the full list of items included in the set:
Nikon Rumors did some number crunching, and calculated that this full set would have a retail value of $89,800 in the United States. Map Camera is selling the kit for ¥8,000,000, or roughly $82,744.

What’s interesting is that more than 60% of the kit’s value is due to just 6 lenses in the kit: the $17,900 800mm f/5.6, the $9,800 600mm f/4, the $8,400 500mm f/4, the $9,000 400mm f/2.8, the $5,800 300mm f/2.8, and the $5,800 200mm f/2. Those six lenses cost nearly $60,000 by themselves!

Source
*
RM240K++ doh.gif doh.gif Memang sohem
gunzerdude
post Aug 13 2013, 10:50 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(leongkokloon @ Aug 13 2013, 10:46 AM)
based on the list some can be removed e.g.
Nikon D4
AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm F2.8G ED
AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR
AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm F2.8G ED
AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm F4G ED VR
AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm F2.8G ED VR II
AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm F4G ED VR
AF-S NIKKOR 80-400mm F4.5-5.6G ED VR
AF-S NIKKOR 200-400mm F4G ED VR II
AF-S NIKKOR 24mm F1.4G ED
AF-S NIKKOR 28mm F1.8G
AF-S NIKKOR 35mm F1.4G
AF-S Micro NIKKOR 60mm F2.8G ED
AF-S NIKKOR 85mm F1.4G
AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm F2.8G IF-ED
AF-S NIKKOR 200mm F2G ED VR II
AF-S NIKKOR 300mm F2.8G ED VR II
AF-S NIKKOR 400mm F2.8G ED VR
AF-S NIKKOR 500mm F4G ED VR
AF-S NIKKOR 600mm F4G ED VR
AF-S NIKKOR 800mm F5.6E FL ED VR

IMHO there can also save some $$$
*
Not that much compared to taking out the bottom 6 lenses laugh.gif
gunzerdude
post Aug 13 2013, 11:05 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Aug 13 2013, 11:01 AM)
Woah, a camera or a house?  laugh.gif  laugh.gif
*
Imagine carrying all of that on you in one go thumbup.gif
gunzerdude
post Aug 13 2013, 11:41 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(leongkokloon @ Aug 13 2013, 11:16 AM)
like carrying a house in hand  laugh.gif
*
Actually still ok la compared to those unker and richfag kids driving banglo-price-equivalent cars on the road doh.gif

13 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0521sec    0.88    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 05:19 PM