i know who you are
Mr.Ho 

for i-city event or just for fun add?

i very easy to found one, duno, not really want join group since i know nothing about photography :V
well i more in Dota2 teehee 

or TF2

Hi guys,

just wanna check if any of you all are using the D7100? Can share the purchase price?..

Thinking of upgrading from my D90... not ready to step into FX yet as the only FX glass I have is a 50mm only... hehe..

Is the absence of the AA filter really producing such a stark difference in your outputs? You get a little more detail and a pics are a little sharper and unless you are routinely printing billboard sizes, I think it will hardly make a difference. Most people wouldn't even notice. Besides, the 'moment' captured is more important than the details captured but missing the moment completely.

I am referring more to the differences one would experience with the lenses focal lengths when switching to full frame from APS-C. I think that is worth more than a missing AA filter. When you are on APS-C you will seldom use a 50mm lens because it is too tight but would not give you the same feel as an 85mm on a full frame. You will also hunt for UWA that is in the range of 10mm to 16mm but using a FF 20mm is plenty wide and 50mm is great for a walk about and 85mm feels very right for portraits. You won't get this on an APS-C.

D600 got AA filter removed ar?   
but then you're not the only jelly 

Permission to share   

help me see the point here of the group
its a closed group, so the ppl in there will be the same here.
so why not just post stuff here?

anyone here using nikon 40mm 2.8 dx?....how about it over 35mm 1.8g....?...other than focal lenght differ and macro ability...

past i am using 40mm stm canon (pancake) and very pleased with its image quality...

35mm still beats the 40mm, tried my friends 35mm and it focuses macro much better than the 40mm and has a much wider aperture.

for DX , theres only the 40mm 2.8 version what?

I've tested it last week (or maybe that was 2 weeks back)

focusing for both 40mm and 35mm was almost similar but of course being a 'dedicated' macro lens , the 40mm was able to focus much nearer to the subject than the 35mm, but for me, with the option of the widest aperture it gives (which is 1.8), I'd take the 35mm any day over the 40mm, if you want to focus nearer without blocking your lighting get a more longer focal length macro lens like the 105 f/2.8.

no..not for time being....potrait more likely...but sometimes shot small product photo such pc watercooling parts....i would be please to have a lens that can do both...not really a 1:1 magnification....just closed enough would be great....read some review and walah Nikon 40mm f/2.8 DX G AF-S as result of bargain...

Extension tubes so cheap? Kenko brand?

Non AF versions very cheap one cause no electrical connection.

AF Ext tubes RM180+

But who cares, macro goes better with MF 

Can't seems to find any really cheap extension tubes in GS

You got any links for the AF ext tubes? i looked around and saw most shops selling 500-600 (crazy price  )

i see a lot of words.. where are them photos ?

Well.. I'm looking for the alternative, the Tokina 100mm F/2.8, gooding price as well.. waiting the chance to visit some shops/friends to test it 

Is this the one for Nikon AF, bro gunzerdude? But kinda expensive...

http://shashinki.com/shop/kenko-auto-exten...ras-p-1220.html

Does the brand for electrical ext tubes matter? the kenkko ones are so expensive compared to the Meike ones.