QUOTE(Pmc @ May 12 2013, 11:20 AM)
yea, everyone said no VC sharper and i've seen it myself too... this DXO drunk? @@ Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.20, Nikon when you fix the D600 dust gate!?
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.20, Nikon when you fix the D600 dust gate!?
|
|
May 12 2013, 04:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,562 posts Joined: May 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 12 2013, 05:44 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard |
QUOTE(BlizzardCraft @ May 12 2013, 04:09 PM) haha.. maybe it's biased after all.. even here also the difference is very obvioushttp://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews...omp=0&APIComp=0 |
|
|
May 12 2013, 06:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,965 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
Looking for 85mm 1.8g, I heard brand new now at rm 1450, anyone can confirm? Thanks!
|
|
|
May 12 2013, 06:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
|
|
|
May 12 2013, 06:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,965 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
|
|
|
May 12 2013, 06:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(Pmc @ May 12 2013, 05:44 PM) haha.. maybe it's biased after all.. even here also the difference is very obvious Could it be lens to lens variance? As in the best of non VC was compared against the lousiest among the VC?http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews...omp=0&APIComp=0 |
|
|
|
|
|
May 12 2013, 06:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,562 posts Joined: May 2012 |
QUOTE(Pmc @ May 12 2013, 05:44 PM) haha.. maybe it's biased after all.. even here also the difference is very obvious yea, the 17-55 wont be performing that poorly.. the sharpness low compared to the tamrons...http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews...omp=0&APIComp=0 QUOTE(celciuz @ May 12 2013, 06:36 PM) Could it be lens to lens variance? As in the best of non VC was compared against the lousiest among the VC? hmm .. might be, but what about the nikkor 17-55? |
|
|
May 12 2013, 06:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard |
QUOTE(piscesguy @ May 12 2013, 06:34 PM) https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...61&hl=85mm+1.8ghere cheaper abit. lol |
|
|
May 12 2013, 06:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,242 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: |
QUOTE(amduser @ May 12 2013, 01:14 AM) yup, definitely expensive, but it worth the price asked. the sukiyaki was actually 2 people's portion, just add another bowl of rice can fill up 2 stomach. and the sushi, having eaten at few places in kl, it's definitely one of the best, yet not the most expensive, and it's very reasonably priced given the quality (sushi isn't all about that piece of fish on top, it's also the balance and the skill to "pinch" it). after i came back from Tokyo, only realize almost all of my previous favorite Japanese restaurant became "fake" Japanese cuisine, but rakuzen (subang ss15), while not quite authentic, definitely didn't disappoint. |
|
|
May 12 2013, 06:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,562 posts Joined: May 2012 |
QUOTE(piscesguy @ May 12 2013, 06:05 PM) i bought mine rm1330 like that..from here https://www.facebook.com/CreativePhotoCamera?flyingspaghettimonster=ts&fref=ts. cheapest maybe can get 1300 other place. |
|
|
May 12 2013, 07:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,965 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
QUOTE(Pmc @ May 12 2013, 06:45 PM) Thanks |
|
|
May 12 2013, 07:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,965 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
QUOTE(BlizzardCraft @ May 12 2013, 06:48 PM) i bought mine rm1330 like that..from here https://www.facebook.com/CreativePhotoCamer...ster=ts&fref=ts Thanks. cheapest maybe can get 1300 other place. |
|
|
May 12 2013, 07:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
693 posts Joined: Dec 2007 |
Edit: Double posted
This post has been edited by gunzerdude: May 12 2013, 07:57 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 12 2013, 07:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
693 posts Joined: Dec 2007 |
Thinking of getting a 90mm F/2.8 VC to do double duty as portrait lens and also to replace my current 60mm F/2 Macro lens
Or maybe just buy the 85mm 1.8G as a pure tele/portait solution. VS ![]() Any thoughts on this?? This post has been edited by gunzerdude: May 12 2013, 07:58 PM |
|
|
May 12 2013, 08:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard |
QUOTE(gunzerdude @ May 12 2013, 07:57 PM) Thinking of getting a 90mm F/2.8 VC to do double duty as portrait lens and also to replace my current 60mm F/2 Macro lens but AF more the tamron macro lens is slow, maybe wont be so good for portraitOr maybe just buy the 85mm 1.8G as a pure tele/portait solution. VS ![]() Any thoughts on this?? |
|
|
May 12 2013, 08:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
693 posts Joined: Dec 2007 |
QUOTE(Pmc @ May 12 2013, 08:01 PM) The AF speed is quite comparable, since the Tamron is using a USD motor, and the 1.8G not really that fast (1.4G is way faster This post has been edited by gunzerdude: May 12 2013, 08:04 PM |
|
|
May 12 2013, 08:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
1.8G sharper
|
|
|
May 12 2013, 08:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
my dearest nikonians
come and see who win the KLPA 2013 first, second and third prize petronas gallery 1st june 2013 |
|
|
May 12 2013, 09:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(gunzerdude @ May 12 2013, 07:57 PM) Thinking of getting a 90mm F/2.8 VC to do double duty as portrait lens and also to replace my current 60mm F/2 Macro lens Both are different purpose lens.Or maybe just buy the 85mm 1.8G as a pure tele/portait solution. VS ![]() Any thoughts on this?? For the Tamron 90mm f/2.8 VC Macro, how much are you paying for? You can almost buy the Nikkor's 105mm f/2.8 VR, which is better in many ways. |
|
|
May 12 2013, 11:24 PM
|
|
VIP
5,938 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Now In The City of Merlion |
Last nite in kk.. going home soon
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0183sec
0.83
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 05:21 PM |