Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
127 Pages « < 28 29 30 31 32 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.20, Nikon when you fix the D600 dust gate!?

views
     
BlizzardCraft
post May 12 2013, 04:09 PM

ChiakChiak
******
Senior Member
1,562 posts

Joined: May 2012


QUOTE(Pmc @ May 12 2013, 11:20 AM)
never tried all 3, but the non VC copy i have is really sharp indeed  laugh.gif
*
yea, everyone said no VC sharper and i've seen it myself too... this DXO drunk? @@ blink.gif
Pmc
post May 12 2013, 05:44 PM

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
******
Senior Member
1,182 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Asgard


QUOTE(BlizzardCraft @ May 12 2013, 04:09 PM)
yea, everyone said no VC sharper and i've seen it myself too... this DXO drunk? @@  blink.gif
*
haha.. maybe it's biased after all.. even here also the difference is very obvious

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews...omp=0&APIComp=0
piscesguy
post May 12 2013, 06:05 PM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,965 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
Looking for 85mm 1.8g, I heard brand new now at rm 1450, anyone can confirm? Thanks!
Silverfire
post May 12 2013, 06:19 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(piscesguy @ May 12 2013, 06:05 PM)
Looking for 85mm 1.8g, I heard brand new now at rm 1450, anyone can confirm? Thanks!
*
Definitely can get cheaper biggrin.gif
piscesguy
post May 12 2013, 06:34 PM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,965 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(Silverfire @ May 12 2013, 06:19 PM)
Definitely can get cheaper biggrin.gif
*
Really?? Where ? How much?
celciuz
post May 12 2013, 06:36 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(Pmc @ May 12 2013, 05:44 PM)
haha.. maybe it's biased after all.. even here also the difference is very obvious

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews...omp=0&APIComp=0
*
Could it be lens to lens variance? As in the best of non VC was compared against the lousiest among the VC?
BlizzardCraft
post May 12 2013, 06:42 PM

ChiakChiak
******
Senior Member
1,562 posts

Joined: May 2012


QUOTE(Pmc @ May 12 2013, 05:44 PM)
haha.. maybe it's biased after all.. even here also the difference is very obvious

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews...omp=0&APIComp=0
*
yea, the 17-55 wont be performing that poorly.. the sharpness low compared to the tamrons...

QUOTE(celciuz @ May 12 2013, 06:36 PM)
Could it be lens to lens variance? As in the best of non VC was compared against the lousiest among the VC?
*
hmm .. might be, but what about the nikkor 17-55?
Pmc
post May 12 2013, 06:45 PM

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
******
Senior Member
1,182 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Asgard


QUOTE(piscesguy @ May 12 2013, 06:34 PM)
Really?? Where ? How much?
*
https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...61&hl=85mm+1.8g

here cheaper abit. lol
little ice
post May 12 2013, 06:45 PM

PROFESSIONAL TROLL
*******
Senior Member
3,242 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From:
QUOTE(amduser @ May 12 2013, 01:14 AM)
i went there once, their food is superb, but i think the price is expensive
*
yup, definitely expensive, but it worth the price asked. the sukiyaki was actually 2 people's portion, just add another bowl of rice can fill up 2 stomach. and the sushi, having eaten at few places in kl, it's definitely one of the best, yet not the most expensive, and it's very reasonably priced given the quality (sushi isn't all about that piece of fish on top, it's also the balance and the skill to "pinch" it). after i came back from Tokyo, only realize almost all of my previous favorite Japanese restaurant became "fake" Japanese cuisine, but rakuzen (subang ss15), while not quite authentic, definitely didn't disappoint. biggrin.gif
BlizzardCraft
post May 12 2013, 06:48 PM

ChiakChiak
******
Senior Member
1,562 posts

Joined: May 2012


QUOTE(piscesguy @ May 12 2013, 06:05 PM)
Looking for 85mm 1.8g, I heard brand new now at rm 1450, anyone can confirm? Thanks!
*
i bought mine rm1330 like that..from here https://www.facebook.com/CreativePhotoCamera?flyingspaghettimonster=ts&fref=ts

. cheapest maybe can get 1300 other place.
piscesguy
post May 12 2013, 07:19 PM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,965 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(Pmc @ May 12 2013, 06:45 PM)
Thanks
piscesguy
post May 12 2013, 07:19 PM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,965 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(BlizzardCraft @ May 12 2013, 06:48 PM)
i bought mine rm1330 like that..from here https://www.facebook.com/CreativePhotoCamer...ster=ts&fref=ts

. cheapest maybe can get 1300 other place.
*
Thanks
gunzerdude
post May 12 2013, 07:54 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


Edit: Double posted

This post has been edited by gunzerdude: May 12 2013, 07:57 PM
gunzerdude
post May 12 2013, 07:57 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


Thinking of getting a 90mm F/2.8 VC to do double duty as portrait lens and also to replace my current 60mm F/2 Macro lens

Or maybe just buy the 85mm 1.8G as a pure tele/portait solution.

user posted image VS user posted image

Any thoughts on this??

This post has been edited by gunzerdude: May 12 2013, 07:58 PM
Pmc
post May 12 2013, 08:01 PM

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
******
Senior Member
1,182 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Asgard


QUOTE(gunzerdude @ May 12 2013, 07:57 PM)
Thinking of getting a 90mm F/2.8 VC to do double duty as portrait lens and also to replace my current 60mm F/2 Macro lens

Or maybe just buy the 85mm 1.8G as a pure tele/portait solution.

user posted image VS user posted image

Any thoughts on this??
*
but AF more the tamron macro lens is slow, maybe wont be so good for portrait
gunzerdude
post May 12 2013, 08:03 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
693 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(Pmc @ May 12 2013, 08:01 PM)
but AF more the tamron macro lens is slow, maybe wont be so good for portrait
*
The AF speed is quite comparable, since the Tamron is using a USD motor, and the 1.8G not really that fast (1.4G is way faster rclxub.gif )

This post has been edited by gunzerdude: May 12 2013, 08:04 PM
KTCY
post May 12 2013, 08:12 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
1.8G sharper rolleyes.gif
ifer
post May 12 2013, 08:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,637 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


my dearest nikonians
come and see who win the KLPA 2013 first, second and third prize

petronas gallery 1st june 2013
Andy214
post May 12 2013, 09:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,308 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(gunzerdude @ May 12 2013, 07:57 PM)
Thinking of getting a 90mm F/2.8 VC to do double duty as portrait lens and also to replace my current 60mm F/2 Macro lens

Or maybe just buy the 85mm 1.8G as a pure tele/portait solution.

user posted image VS user posted image

Any thoughts on this??
*
Both are different purpose lens.

For the Tamron 90mm f/2.8 VC Macro, how much are you paying for? You can almost buy the Nikkor's 105mm f/2.8 VR, which is better in many ways.

Maniac
post May 12 2013, 11:24 PM

That Tech Guy Who Use Nikon For Video
Group Icon
VIP
5,938 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Now In The City of Merlion



Last nite in kk.. going home soon

127 Pages « < 28 29 30 31 32 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0183sec    0.83    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 05:21 PM