QUOTE(David83 @ Apr 10 2013, 10:27 PM)
Well, I'm stating the fact.
Even the other PM agent admitted that PFEPRF wasn't shinning during its first year. That's why I switched out.

I also admitted that I have made a couple of bad investment choices with PM too.
Never invest blindly.
I put up a query about the recent bad performance of Pacific Global Stars Fund at FSM forum, they said they already forwarded my query to Pacific Mutual. See how fast they respond and how's the response like. If I write direct to Pacific Mutual, doubt that they will respond cos I don't maintain an investment account with Pacific Mutual, they won't respond to a nobody, would they?

QUOTE(gark @ Apr 10 2013, 10:43 PM)
That day at airplane met grand daughter of the owner of kapal api coffee. Young and preety, family worth billions. Want to introduce?

she say her hobby is travel round the world, currently study at england. Interested?

I cannot afford to maintain such bini
QUOTE(howszat @ Apr 10 2013, 10:28 PM)
Is this about PFEPRF?
In general terms, never just look at the launch and what they said, or the prospectus alone. Look at the latest few quarterly reports (or whatever they have), or even the fund factsheet, for more information about what the fund manager(s) are actually doing rather than the vague, generalised information in the prospectus.
In addition, the same fund manager(s) may have good years previously but not this year, or there may have been a change of managers, or the fund objectives may not be suitable to the current economic cycle, or a few other things I'm not aware of.
Yeah, just look at what happened to Pacific Global Stars Fund recently. It won awards for best equity fund for past 3 and 5 years, during which it outperformed its peers. But past 3 months underperformance wiped out all the good work
This post has been edited by Pink Spider: Apr 10 2013, 10:53 PM