home prepared yee sang...

Nikon V1

Mr. Loh Yee Sang by Little Ice LYN, on Flickr

also correct..

but after buy D5100 and sooooo much happy with it then i think can save more if use the d5100 and wqit more for the D600 or the next predecessor

y the fish is dark colored one ?

marinated yee sang XD

new AF-S NIKKOR 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G ED

http://www.cameraegg.org/af-s-nikkor-18-35...ures-and-specs/

Today only i know its actually hard to pose infront of camera, especially in studio environment

Me look like such a dork

just a remade of the AF-D version

its ok. unless you have a S curve

it's raw fish but mackerel type, japanese mackerel "Aji". doesn't seems to go well with yee sang though. best one still maguro sashimi (raw tuna) or the more popular salmon sashimi or smoked salmon. they're more expensive so i bought the Aji instead but seem i get what i pay for.

I went ahead and bought the Nikon D5100 . Digitalrev provides a worldwide local service centre warranty, feel good to have my 5 years old baby changed

Hi guys, I have a question (and need some advice as well).

Nikon is most likely launching a D7k replacement this year right? I'm planning to come back to the DSLR world from a mirrorless system. I was originally intending to get the d600 + a prime (I plan to only shoot primes unless I suddenly can afford one of the super zooms). My budget isn't that big, but optimally I was hoping to get a 28mm f1.8 coupled with the d600 body.

I chose that focal length because I'm shooting 35mm on an APS-C sensory currently and I feel like it's just a *little* too tight for my uses of it.

Then when I thought about it, if Nikons new d7k successor is good enough, then the 28mm prime would be 42mm; Just a little less tighter compared to 52mm view if I used a 35mm prime on a crop sensor body. Going this route will save me alot of cash too.

But after reading some reviews on the lens, I found (from photozone.de), that the 28mm f1.8 performs differently on an FX and DX body in terms of MTF readings. On FX, the lens performs statistically better compared to the DX. Why?

I learned from past experience that relying on MTF readings aren't really helpful all the time, so I usually try to look for picture samples of the lens. But if the sharpness does differ on FX and DX, then it might be irrelevant for me to do so.


Any advice?

I might just end up getting the D600 with the 50mm 1.8G. But I kinda like slightly wider focal lengths. But aih, FF got good dynamic range and ISO performance.

This post has been edited by Decky: Jan 29 2013, 02:57 PM

hahaha
it's a good experience kan?

get the FX.
in image size for FX you can use back DX crop factor if u needed

must try FX...dun have the budget yet..

i dont think u noticed the disclaimer or read the review properly on photozone.


if want to compare somewhat tho, the FX test is using a D3x which has lesser pixel density than the D7000...so usually the D3x will also appear 'sharper'...and again which photozone explained in the review.
a more accurate comparison would be to compare the lens on D7000 and D800 which both have basically similar pixel density.

Plese CnC


Moon by Pro3363, on Flickr

Cannot see detail on the moon

My moon, blurred the clouds


This post has been edited by Silverfire: Jan 29 2013, 07:37 PM

Nice photo u have there....... What the settings u used for this photo.......?

1/250 ISO100 F4 200mm

The clouds weren't really visible so I just bumped up the Shadows.

i wonder why nikkor dont have wide angle G series prime lens

no market demand?

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/24mm-f14.htm

24 1.4G or even wider?