QUOTE(David83 @ Jan 5 2013, 10:08 PM)
If you want to DIY and enjoy lower SC, go to FSM.
5/5.25% SC is a whopping rate over 2% top at FSM.
Disclaimer: This provided that you know what you're doing without professional advices and consultation.
Agree with you... PB/PM discount sc 5% is not attractive anymore ever since FSM online platform is here. We are seeing FSM progressing day by day to bring in new funds, even lower sc 0.5 - 1% for equities every few months to do promotion, friendly staff, inviding fundhouse to give talk, etc.. I am impressed!
Added on January 5, 2013, 10:05 pmQUOTE(wongmunkeong @ Jan 5 2013, 10:42 PM)
er.. FSM is max 2% VS PM's 5.5% (normal) = PM's service charges 3.5% MORE than FSM
FSM
if one is silver ($50K-$149,999 held investment or cost paid, whichever higher, INCLUDING BONDS & MONEY MARKET), then FSM charges 1.75% only
if one is gold (>=$150K held investment or cost paid, whichever higher, INCLUDING BONDS & MONEY MARKET), then FSM charges 1.75% only
VS
PM's Mutual Gold and Mutual Super Duper Gold.... insurance & stuff.
In addition, during "sales" in FSM at 1%, those silver/gold additional discounts are deducted from the 1% too.
This coming 26th Jan 2013 KLCCentre do, 0.5% only but the silver/gold additional discounts doesn't kick in (if i'm not mistaken)
VS
PM's "sales" 5%
As an investor, i'd rather lower my costs - extra insurance coverage (which PM gives) on top of what i'm holding is just blah.
In addition, as an investor, my HELD INVESTMENTS are supposed to grow, thus FSM's "counting" of the higher of "held investments" or "cost paid" to qualify is even more oomph.
The final nail in the coffin in terms of cost control is that bond funds & money market funds (the 0% service charges and 0% exit charges too) count towards Silver and Gold in FSM.
IMHO, my only pain with FSM is the SWITCHING between Fund Houses.
Semi-solved by ignoring Inter-Fund house switching, just switch bond-equity funds within Fund Houses for now
Just sharing for investors that are cost picky.
Note - i'm a PM agent and i STILL get into FSM for cash investments

. Pls note that agents get 2.75% or more (depending on level) + "career benefits" (ie. 0.2% of all equity funds held by customers). Yet, FSM is still cost effective & more options to me. Imagine that

Note 2 - not PM bashing yar, just that IMHO it's not the most cost effective and flexible for cash investments now.
haha... if your PM upline read this, he/she will be furious to you bro..
Added on January 5, 2013, 10:11 pmQUOTE(mois @ Jan 5 2013, 10:54 PM)
Fundsupermart is indeed very attractive due to its cost. But, they seriously need to open more branches in Malaysia. There is no FSM branch in Kuching and make it hard to attract more customers though. That is the reason why public mutual dominate the UT market due to its presence. Although the sales charges is high.
Yea... other parts of the states will miss out the roadshows, investing talks, etc. I think FSM will gain more market and take some of PM market shares as well. End of the day, this is online Ut investment and is godo for those who are investment savvy ppl. Those who are not so, FSM provides Live Chat which I would say every effective. Also their Client Investment Specialist are every ready to serve you and I can tell you that they will surely response to your email within 1 working day. If they can't get back to you, they will call you and tell you that they are workign on it...
PM will still have market shares on the more matured population, retirees , etc.. just my thought.
This post has been edited by Kaka23: Jan 5 2013, 10:11 PM