Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
39 Pages « < 30 31 32 33 34 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Kia K3 aka Kia Forte 2013 !, look naise

views
     
Buydirect
post May 30 2013, 01:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
135 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(silentsunami @ May 29 2013, 06:09 PM)
Come on SA, those are the improvement that need to be done by KIA when every 5 years refresh. If no improvement done on new model, how KIA going to sell their new model car? It cannot be use as a sole reason to jack up the price so much
*
"Improvement" is a very broad word. A new design itself, (without new technologies and spec) is also an improvement. Even a facelift, is an improvement. I would have to agree with you if this model is just a facelift of the current Forte, and not an entirely new one from ground up with at least 30 enhancements or new specs.

A case in point, when Naza launched the recent facelifted Next Gen Sorento, with 33 enhancements, they did not increase the price. So much for being greedy?

I do not know, if the tax/duty structure had a hand in the % of the price increase. If could be, since it is no longer batched as Naza. Just my 2cents.



Motorman
post May 30 2013, 02:07 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
4 posts

Joined: Apr 2012


QUOTE(Buydirect @ May 30 2013, 02:49 PM)
"Improvement" is a very broad word. A new design itself, (without new technologies and spec) is also an improvement. Even a facelift, is an improvement. I would have to agree with you if this model is just a facelift of the current Forte, and not an entirely new one from ground up with at least 30 enhancements or new specs. 

A case in point, when Naza launched the recent facelifted Next Gen Sorento, with 33 enhancements, they did not increase the price. So much for being greedy?

I do not know, if the tax/duty structure had a hand in the % of the price increase. If could be, since it is no longer batched as Naza. Just my 2cents.
*
thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
kcng
post May 30 2013, 02:30 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(jayraptor @ May 29 2013, 11:13 PM)
You are not envy of Korean makes. More like having eyesore over Korean makes success.

If you don't know, Toyota look at Hyundai-Kia more of a threat than Honda because Hyundai-Kia are proven reliable and durable on hot harsh weather and road condition. Today you can find Toyota and also Hyundai-Kia on Arabs, African, West Asia soil because only these cars could sustain the harsh condition with minimal maintenance. There are always the less gadget LX and EX grade models available that could serve you well over 10 years. However, locals here mostly wanted as much gadgets as possible therefore they bring in only the high and ultra high specs in.

Toyota nowadays don't even bother Nissan and Honda as they are considered inferior. Mazda is another new threat that have superior tech. Wonder what you mean on weak legs? Tie rod and lower arm of suspension?

Since new K3 is priced higher, Forte RV is safe and will become stronger than ever. In US, EU, AU, the price range is set for A, B, C, D segments. New models will sell under that range, won't increase unless there's inflation. Over here, new FaceLift auto increase RM2k. New model add RM5k to RM10k more. If priced too close to P1 under protection policy, penalty increase another RM10k. Ofcourse, when price being forced to increase, car company get to share some too.
*
wtf?
putting words into my mouth?

eye sore?
wtf for?

as eye-catching as their design are, or as well arm as their spec sheets are... their legs are still weak and that is a big turn off... in my books...
so wtf with the reliable bla bla bla bla bla harsh bla bla bla bla talk...

i want something that can drive and be driven well....
and your korean comes up real short in my book...
pobox
post May 30 2013, 02:47 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
551 posts

Joined: May 2013


Any fire sale on the out going forte? Please PM me if there is any.
jayraptor
post May 30 2013, 09:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(weakmeal69 @ May 30 2013, 12:14 AM)
im doing my thesis in ship power plant and am quite surprise cause most of big logistic company nowadays more prefer to hyundai diesel engine and genset rather than known wartsila and man engine. eventhough founded just for the last 4 years, it gained quite a popularity nowadays.. i dont see y korean cannot beat japanese one day.
*
Hi weakmeal69,

Glad to meet some1 from engineering field. Is your thesis done on local shipping companies fleet or worldwide? If it is local, I am surprised to know that they already started using Hyundai diesel engine & genset? I am more used to CAT anyway. Thanks for the info.

In terms of automotive lines, the Koreans do posses some diesel technology that are better than its Japanese counterpart nowadays. Problem with Japan, they are not encouraged to go further into diesel, therefore their tech is dated compared to conti diesel engine and even Korean.
jayraptor
post May 30 2013, 09:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(kcng @ May 30 2013, 02:30 PM)
wtf?
putting words into my mouth?

eye sore?
wtf for?

as eye-catching as their design are, or as well arm as their spec sheets are... their legs are still weak and that is a big turn off... in my books...
so wtf with the reliable bla bla bla bla bla harsh bla bla bla bla talk...

i want something that can drive and be driven well....
and your korean comes up real short in my book...
*
Your reply only fill in the blanks with foul language initial and there is entirely nothing. Today, you can find Forte in hot Arab desert where their regulation is breakdown must never happen. However, there is no Civic, no Teana, no Sylphy in hot Arab desert nowadays. However, you can still find old Accord in Arab large city but not selling well. They used to have N-brand but now fading and took over by Korean makes. Toyota, it will be there. Mazda, it is making its way there too.

Fact is, cars that are reliable, durable and practical only could make it into Arabs market. You could not even pinpoint technically what leg is weak? Do you mean the tie rod, lower arms, suspension, frame?

All I can say about my old Forte 1.6EX 4AT is that I could keep driving this car for over 10 years without problem as long as I keep it service. Korean makes, its engines & gearbox carried Japanese + American DNA whereas the design is german DNA.

If Kia willing to go further to provide conti handling, they'll have to fork out extra cost to give higher end suspension (upper part soft but lower part very stiff) that gives comfort and handling. If they were to do so, they'll end up having to sell more expensive than Japanese makes. In Australia, Mazda 6 costs more expensive than other Japanese D-segments despite same tax rate for all. Reason being, more ingredients being included.
Nyiwon
post May 30 2013, 11:05 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
21 posts

Joined: May 2013
QUOTE(jayraptor @ May 30 2013, 10:29 PM)
Your reply only fill in the blanks with foul language initial and there is entirely nothing. Today, you can find Forte in hot Arab desert where their regulation is breakdown must never happen. However, there is no Civic, no Teana, no Sylphy in hot Arab desert nowadays. However, you can still find old Accord in Arab large city but not selling well. They used to have N-brand but now fading and took over by Korean makes. Toyota, it will be there. Mazda, it is making its way there too.

Fact is, cars that are reliable, durable and practical only could make it into Arabs market. You could not even pinpoint technically what leg is weak? Do you mean the tie rod, lower arms, suspension, frame?

All I can say about my old Forte 1.6EX 4AT is that I could keep driving this car for over 10 years without problem as long as I keep it service. Korean makes, its engines & gearbox carried Japanese + American DNA whereas the design is german DNA.

If Kia willing to go further to provide conti handling, they'll have to fork out extra cost to give higher end suspension (upper part soft but lower part very stiff) that gives comfort and handling. If they were to do so, they'll end up having to sell more expensive than Japanese makes. In Australia, Mazda 6 costs more expensive than other Japanese D-segments despite same tax rate for all. Reason being, more ingredients being included.
*
Just look at his signature quote. laugh.gif

No need explain Korea car to him.



This post has been edited by Nyiwon: May 30 2013, 11:06 PM
weakmeal69
post May 31 2013, 12:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Jan 2009



QUOTE(jayraptor @ May 30 2013, 09:07 PM)
Hi weakmeal69,

Glad to meet some1 from engineering field. Is your thesis done on local shipping companies fleet or worldwide? If it is local, I am surprised to know that they already started using Hyundai diesel engine & genset? I am more used to CAT anyway. Thanks for the info.

In terms of automotive lines, the Koreans do posses some diesel technology that are better than its Japanese counterpart nowadays. Problem with Japan, they are not encouraged to go further into diesel, therefore their tech is dated compared to conti diesel engine and even Korean.
*
nope..im studying in russia btw.n now im doing thesis based on Greece shipping company. as for malaysian i think they r still relying on those company with reputable rating like man b&w. they still not dare to try something new.. just like msian with their honda n toyota giving a chance for them to monopolize the market.

CAT? lol. it's kinda funny bcause my prof. said that russian engineer really dont prefer it as the say it is a nightmare to maintain n service CAT's product. that what i was told n not to flame cat btw.. notworthy.gif
AMLAN
post May 31 2013, 08:26 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(070 @ May 28 2013, 12:36 AM)
both of spec dont come with GPS , my advise - dont because of GPS you choose the car as GPS is very cheap it market . it maybe cost you Rm300++
*
yes that's true
AMLAN
post May 31 2013, 08:29 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(achol77 @ May 28 2013, 09:21 AM)
IMHO buy portable GPS unit. Can use for other cars, cheaper & easier to update. Buy KIA ....Honda cheat people. So pricey but Korean built quality better .....not to mention the spec. The only sad thing is that in this Bolehland, people still go for T & H for resale value which still baffles me.

In the end you should enjoy your own ride, not look at others who have K3 and envy them later on smile.gif
If you still want Honda Civic go without the GPS also, not worth the extra 5k right?
*
Yes I'm agree with u, K3 Specs are better than Civic even by design. the only cool about Civic is the two tier meter. My mother always want me to buy Civic, because she said people will look high if drive the H brand. but my heart are with K3. So headache about this. hopefully my mother's will change her mind after see the actual K3 during the launching this July

This post has been edited by AMLAN: May 31 2013, 08:48 AM
kcng
post May 31 2013, 08:59 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(jayraptor @ May 30 2013, 09:29 PM)
Your reply only fill in the blanks with foul language initial and there is entirely nothing. Today, you can find Forte in hot Arab desert where their regulation is breakdown must never happen. However, there is no Civic, no Teana, no Sylphy in hot Arab desert nowadays. However, you can still find old Accord in Arab large city but not selling well. They used to have N-brand but now fading and took over by Korean makes. Toyota, it will be there. Mazda, it is making its way there too.

Fact is, cars that are reliable, durable and practical only could make it into Arabs market. You could not even pinpoint technically what leg is weak? Do you mean the tie rod, lower arms, suspension, frame?

All I can say about my old Forte 1.6EX 4AT is that I could keep driving this car for over 10 years without problem as long as I keep it service. Korean makes, its engines & gearbox carried Japanese + American DNA whereas the design is german DNA.

If Kia willing to go further to provide conti handling, they'll have to fork out extra cost to give higher end suspension (upper part soft but lower part very stiff) that gives comfort and handling. If they were to do so, they'll end up having to sell more expensive than Japanese makes. In Australia, Mazda 6 costs more expensive than other Japanese D-segments despite same tax rate for all. Reason being, more ingredients being included.
*
when petrol heads means legs.... it means the entire works la... adui....
if i break it down and explain to you, i dont think you will survive past the first line...

huah, what tie rod la, what lower arms la, what suspension la...
rolleyes.gif

handling is not only suspension la my dear.....
TOC is that way... --------------------------> please enroll there first...
SUSMamapapamsia
post May 31 2013, 09:07 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
304 posts

Joined: Aug 2012
Still got ppl kena con by these korean manufacturers?! Unbelievable. Koreans got a long way to fo to catch up with the Japanese.
edison1437
post May 31 2013, 09:09 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(jayraptor @ May 29 2013, 10:58 PM)
You can check the size of the Multi-link in Mazda 6, its a quality one comparable to conti makes. K5 multi-link, the bone size is smaller and at the same time, they build their cars like in between Japanese and conti therefore they don't get close to conti. The K3 Cerato and Elantra, if they are fitted with Multi-link instead of torsion beam, it might get you somewhere nearer to conti. Also, depends on how willing are they to give you the more expensive, bigger and heavier multi-link bone. Doing so could end up getting less interior space.

Comparing Lancer '07 and Forte '09 that are sharing the same platform. The Forte has slightly more space inside due to torsion beam and it has 2650mm wheelbase compared to 2635mm in Lancer. The weight difference is evident too. Kerb weight Lancer 2.0GT 1380kg, Lancer 2.0GL 1330k while Forte 2.0L at 1293kg, that explains where the Lancer gets the additional kerb weight. That is in the rear to give it better handling by increasing more weight to the rear to counter the front.
*
hm...i tot forte share same platform with elentra hmm.gif hmm.gif
btw extra 15mm whell base contribute 90kg to the kerb weight
is it what you meant? icon_question.gif
kailord
post May 31 2013, 10:28 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
5 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(Mamapapamsia @ May 31 2013, 09:07 AM)
Still got ppl kena con by these korean manufacturers?! Unbelievable. Koreans got a long way to fo to catch up with the Japanese.
*
Aiyah...Japs was also like that last time. Everybody starts from bottom. Some people feel that Korean cars should be given some chances, so they buy lah. Don't you understand the concept of variety?

If you're a stern believer in Japs, or hate Koreans so much, why not stay away from such threads? Save everyone the trouble.
jootat
post May 31 2013, 10:47 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,994 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(kailord @ May 31 2013, 10:28 AM)
Aiyah...Japs was also like that last time. Everybody starts from bottom. Some people feel that Korean cars should be given some chances, so they buy lah. Don't you understand the concept of variety?

If you're a stern believer in Japs, or hate Koreans so much, why not stay away from such threads? Save everyone the trouble.
*
actually i do agree with u. KIA deserved a chance. When i was in europe, i saw many korean made car (KIA & Hyundai) but they do have more selections than we do here. A lot of model i never see here before.
metalmonk
post May 31 2013, 11:19 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(Buydirect @ May 30 2013, 01:49 PM)
"Improvement" is a very broad word. A new design itself, (without new technologies and spec) is also an improvement. Even a facelift, is an improvement. I would have to agree with you if this model is just a facelift of the current Forte, and not an entirely new one from ground up with at least 30 enhancements or new specs. 

A case in point, when Naza launched the recent facelifted Next Gen Sorento, with 33 enhancements, they did not increase the price. So much for being greedy?

I do not know, if the tax/duty structure had a hand in the % of the price increase. If could be, since it is no longer batched as Naza. Just my 2cents.
*
Only greedy for forte..
dvinez
post May 31 2013, 11:22 AM

Limited Edition
******
Senior Member
1,475 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Paradise



nevermind, quote all those people who complaint, reply them few more years later. we dont know future, but hey, we can forecast brows.gif

cannot deny that korean are still shitty in some stubborn people mind even though they improved. also, i wanted to remind that handling is not everything. lol.


gtfan
post May 31 2013, 12:32 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
932 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(kcng @ May 31 2013, 08:59 AM)
when petrol heads means legs.... it means the entire works la... adui....
if i break it down and explain to you, i dont think you will survive past the first line...

huah, what tie rod la, what lower arms la, what suspension la...
rolleyes.gif

handling is not only suspension la my dear.....
TOC is that way... --------------------------> please enroll there first...
*
You just make yourself look like a fool. When you can't even pinpoint and just claim leg works, you are sounding more like those ahbeng workshop mechanics.

People who knows about cars will know what is lower arm, tie rods, anti roll bars, cv joints, upper arms, multi links, etc.


meteoraniac
post May 31 2013, 12:41 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,099 posts

Joined: Aug 2005


If you have an issue with the supposed negativeness of KIA, then don't buy them. It's that simple. But guess what, there are other ppl out there who give a toss. Just quit moaning about it. It's tired, and it's boring.

kcng
post May 31 2013, 01:05 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(gtfan @ May 31 2013, 12:32 PM)
You just make yourself look like a fool. When you can't even pinpoint and just claim leg works, you are sounding more like those ahbeng workshop mechanics.

People who knows about cars will know what is lower arm, tie rods, anti roll bars, cv joints, upper arms, multi links, etc.
*
user posted image

39 Pages « < 30 31 32 33 34 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0284sec    0.84    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 12:52 AM