Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
39 Pages « < 10 11 12 13 14 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Kia K3 aka Kia Forte 2013 !, look naise

views
     
hamtaro98
post Mar 25 2013, 11:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
139 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
I saw a pic from paultan and noted that malaysia k3 version have different type of rear light design, more like a cheaper one. Is that true ?
hamtaro98
post Mar 25 2013, 11:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
139 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
This one...

NiCkY
post Mar 25 2013, 11:57 PM

The POWER Of Dream(tm)
*******
Senior Member
2,383 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Beside ur House Only
Yes, should be that 1, hopefully is only for low spec model, if happen to all spec and cc, den really wtf.
And also pray that the spec wont differ much...
tititilly
post Mar 26 2013, 03:13 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
QUOTE(hamtaro98 @ Mar 25 2013, 11:10 PM)
This one...
*
this is the cheapo 1?
dvinez
post Mar 26 2013, 10:00 AM

Limited Edition
******
Senior Member
1,475 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Paradise



QUOTE(Mamapapamsia @ Mar 23 2013, 11:44 AM)
Yeap. Elantra 1.6 is srsly pathetic. Can hardly move. 1.8 slightly better but still no real oomph. Just for simple normal crusing. Doesnt really have the oomph in a honda ivtec engine.
The forte 1.6 has a terrible engine.

Already underpowered summore sucks fuel like water. Cant imagine how much fuel the 2.0 will drink
*
QUOTE(goodguyextremist @ Mar 25 2013, 09:25 PM)
What car are you comparing to? Vios 1.5? Elantra 1.6 FC already beaten City and on par with current Altis 1.6 in city driving. Old Forte 1.6 FC somewhere close to non-FL ALtis 1.6 '08.
0-100km/h comparison:
Elantra 1.6 in 11.5s
Forte 1.6 in 11.5s
Altis 1.6 in 11.8s
Vios 11.8s
City 12s

Old Forte 1.6 empty weight with full tank is 1261kg. Elantra 1.6 weight 1220kg. New K3 should be similar to Elantra at 1220kg. Elantra 1.6 FC in mild city driving at 12km/L while Forte at 10.6km/L. Heavy traffic jam, both reduced by 1.6km/L more.
*
just plain basher, look at how he present his statement. no point explain so much lol.
mazer6446
post Mar 26 2013, 12:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
81 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


FYI, forte rank no.1 beating all competitors C-segment

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans...st/viewall.html
jootat
post Mar 26 2013, 01:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,994 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(mazer6446 @ Mar 26 2013, 12:34 PM)
FYI, forte rank no.1 beating all competitors C-segment

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans...st/viewall.html
*
thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
Buydirect
post Mar 26 2013, 02:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
135 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(mazer6446 @ Mar 26 2013, 12:34 PM)
FYI, forte rank no.1 beating all competitors C-segment

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans...st/viewall.html
*
thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
Without a shadow of doubt, Forte is the BEST even in the eyes of auto critics !!!
070
post Mar 27 2013, 10:47 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
QUOTE(mazer6446 @ Mar 26 2013, 12:34 PM)
FYI, forte rank no.1 beating all competitors C-segment

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans...st/viewall.html
*
rclxms.gif rclxms.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
donhay
post Mar 27 2013, 11:42 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
722 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
is it advisable to get the Forte 2.0l or wait for the new K3?

I have been driving my proton waja for 9 years now, monthly keep giving me problems and sent to workshop. Should i just get the present Forte or wait for the K3 ?
yunodie
post Mar 27 2013, 12:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
475 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


its been 9 years. What's 5 mths mean to you?
kailord
post Mar 27 2013, 01:36 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
5 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(yunodie @ Mar 27 2013, 12:54 PM)
its been 9 years. What's 5 mths mean to you?
*
Agreed. If you have around 100k budget, please wait for K3. It has received a few good reviews so far. And is undoubtedly more improved from current model.
Buydirect
post Mar 27 2013, 01:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
135 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(hamtaro98 @ Mar 25 2013, 11:03 PM)
I saw a pic from paultan and noted that malaysia k3 version have different type of rear light design, more like a cheaper one. Is that true ?
*
Basically, there are two designs for rear lamp and also the front radiator grille. The model sold in China is rather different compared to what we are going to get. See attached picture for model sold in China. Would you guys rather have this design?


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image Attached Image
AMLAN
post Mar 27 2013, 02:15 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(mazer6446 @ Mar 26 2013, 12:34 PM)
FYI, forte rank no.1 beating all competitors C-segment

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans...st/viewall.html
*
Wow that So Cool... Can't wait for this to launch here.My mother always wanted me to get Civic, she said people will look U high if drive Brand H compare to Kia. But I see this Car has more value & feature compare to Civic 1.8. I dont care about the RV. I think my heart has gone to K3. Can't wait but hopefully the rear lights will be the LED Combination not the low specs one

This post has been edited by AMLAN: Mar 27 2013, 02:16 PM
jootat
post Mar 27 2013, 02:17 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,994 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(Buydirect @ Mar 27 2013, 01:45 PM)
Basically, there are two designs for rear lamp and also the front radiator grille. The model sold in China is rather different compared to what we are going to get. See attached picture for model sold in China. Would you guys rather have this design?
*
looks ok for this version. was it the so called lower end version?
digitheatre
post Mar 27 2013, 02:23 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
654 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(Buydirect @ Mar 27 2013, 01:45 PM)
Basically, there are two designs for rear lamp and also the front radiator grille. The model sold in China is rather different compared to what we are going to get. See attached picture for model sold in China. Would you guys rather have this design?
*
looks more elegant.. grill abit bmw-ish
stix
post Mar 27 2013, 03:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
276 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
From: Orient


The back end of the China K3 looks more balanced. The one without the chrome across the back lights looks weird somehow
zweimmk
post Mar 27 2013, 03:27 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(stix @ Mar 27 2013, 03:20 PM)
The back end of the China K3 looks more balanced. The one without the chrome across the back lights looks weird somehow
*
Really dislike how the front looks. The back is okay
azfamy
post Mar 27 2013, 04:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
55 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


QUOTE(mazer6446 @ Mar 26 2013, 12:34 PM)
FYI, forte rank no.1 beating all competitors C-segment

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans...st/viewall.html
*
Not ALL. They didn't include many Contis to compete. Focus, Jetta, Peugeots, Cruze, Octavia, bla bla. But yeah, the K3 looks like an okay car.
ferrari38
post Mar 27 2013, 04:36 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
23 posts

Joined: May 2011


QUOTE(mazer6446 @ Mar 26 2013, 12:34 PM)
FYI, forte rank no.1 beating all competitors C-segment

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans...st/viewall.html
*
Wow!so amazed with the acceleration performance of new forte 2.0.
0-96km/h done at 7.8s,it's really fast man shocking.gif
Even faster than golf TSI drool.gif
Wondering if is the same engine that we will getting here hmm.gif

39 Pages « < 10 11 12 13 14 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0358sec    0.45    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 03:43 AM