Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
128 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Hyundai Elantra MD V4, Launching now!

views
     
BuFung
post Mar 31 2012, 02:44 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


QUOTE(666devil @ Mar 31 2012, 02:27 PM)
Yes just test drove. Stop the car first, toggle to econmode screen, press n hold  trip button. It will toggle between on/off
*
QUOTE(harpyboy @ Mar 31 2012, 02:38 PM)
so got any difference between on and off?
*
Devil is right...

On n off.... no different... floor the paddle, still rav over 5.5k rpm... almost 6k rpm n a bit more touching red line dy..
666devil
post Mar 31 2012, 02:55 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,624 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
QUOTE(BuFung @ Mar 31 2012, 02:44 PM)
Devil is right... 

On n off.... no different...  floor the paddle, still rav over 5.5k rpm... almost 6k rpm n a bit more touching red line dy..
*
Can't feel difference with such short test drive. But big difference between 1.6 and 1.8. 1.6 damn underpowered and sluggish response
BuFung
post Mar 31 2012, 02:58 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


There is no diff btwn on n off... just letting u know u driving style is eco or not when u on.... 1.6 r slower than a vios/city on pick up....


The seat leather for 1.6 is on par...... on par with ....

























Myvi....
ezee123
post Mar 31 2012, 03:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
69 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
So in short, if planning to buy 1.6HS, Forte 1.6SX will be a better ??
I can't decide between Elantra and Forte.
666devil
post Mar 31 2012, 03:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,624 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
QUOTE(ezee123 @ Mar 31 2012, 03:05 PM)
So in short, if planning to buy 1.6HS, Forte 1.6SX will be a better ??
I can't decide between Elantra and Forte.
*
If 1.6, go forte. If 1.8, compare with c segments, go elantra

Also confirmed power windows is auto up and down for driver side
BuFung
post Mar 31 2012, 03:41 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


Both 1.6 give very similar feeling...

Confirm forte 1.6sx n 2.0 c/w touch screen navigation..
kangwoo
post Mar 31 2012, 04:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
296 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


bufung,

when you take your elantra
JC999
post Mar 31 2012, 04:41 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
659 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
Just came back from the test drive this morning, tested both 1.6 HS and 1.8.

Some thoughts

1.6

Build quality is quite decent
Engine performance really lacking especially when you take 4 ppl in the car, 2 person is still alright.
Interior space is generous and good looking exterior
Handling is a bit on the soft side, good while going over bumps and normal driving. But there is no chance to hit a corner during the test drive, too many cars on the road.

1,8

Same build
Way better engine performance compare to the 1.6, but i still feel the altis/civic has better torque
Same interior, better leather
Same handling

Conclusion.
Overall is an ok car but I would go for the 1.6 low spec the only difference is the panaromic steering adjustment that most ppl do not need. But do note the VSC, its a good safety feature but not compulsory, been driving without 1 for years.

*Leather is shit, the 1.6 leather feels like plastic and cheap. The 1.8 supposedly nappa leather doesn't feel like it but its better than 1.6. I think the inspira 2.0 leather is way better than them.

Bad decision by SD, they should omit the leather or make it optional and slash 2k of the price.
SUSryanliew87
post Mar 31 2012, 04:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
59 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(JC999 @ Mar 31 2012, 04:41 PM)
Just came back from the test drive this morning, tested both 1.6 HS and 1.8.

Some thoughts

1.6

Build quality is quite decent
Engine performance really lacking especially when you take 4 ppl in the car, 2 person is still alright.
Interior space is generous and good looking exterior
Handling is a bit on the soft side, good while going over bumps and normal driving. But there is no chance to hit a corner during the test drive, too many cars on the road.

1,8

Same build
Way better engine performance compare to the 1.6, but i still feel the altis/civic has better torque
Same interior, better leather
Same handling

Conclusion.
Overall is an ok car but I would go for the 1.6 low spec the only difference is the panaromic steering adjustment that most ppl do not need. But do note the VSC, its a good safety feature but not compulsory, been driving without 1 for years.

*Leather is shit, the 1.6 leather feels like plastic and cheap. The 1.8 supposedly nappa leather doesn't feel like it but its better than 1.6. I think the inspira 2.0 leather is way better than them.

Bad decision by SD, they should omit the leather or make it optional and slash 2k of the price.
*
Thx for the input .... More more 1.6 comments hehe
etseleste
post Mar 31 2012, 04:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
202 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Land of Never Ever


Just testdrove today at Citta. Like the car but biggest setback to me was the headroom for the rear passenger. Although not as low as Honda Insight, however my hair can touch the top while sitting straight. I'm 5ft10. Imagine a 6 footer. Legroom was very spacious. Just the headroom is my concern.
sheahann
post Mar 31 2012, 04:57 PM

Crashing like a tidal wave..
*******
Senior Member
2,263 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: i-city

only 1.8 comes with gps rite ?
etseleste
post Mar 31 2012, 05:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
202 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Land of Never Ever


QUOTE(sheahann @ Mar 31 2012, 04:57 PM)
only 1.8 comes with gps rite ?
*
yes. only 1.8 comes with gps & reverse camera.
kenso77
post Mar 31 2012, 05:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
179 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(BuFung @ Mar 31 2012, 02:44 PM)
Devil is right... 

On n off.... no different...  floor the paddle, still rav over 5.5k rpm... almost 6k rpm n a bit more touching red line dy..
*
On the Sonata, there IS a difference .... since it was a company that was rented, 3 of my staffs tested with and without ECO Mode and the engine response is indeed different (even though the rev line remains similar). Do try to test it with ECO on and off to confirm if this trait is also present in the Elantra
BuFung
post Mar 31 2012, 05:03 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


QUOTE(JC999 @ Mar 31 2012, 04:41 PM)
Just came back from the test drive this morning, tested both 1.6 HS and 1.8.

Some thoughts

1.6

Build quality is quite decent
Engine performance really lacking especially when you take 4 ppl in the car, 2 person is still alright.
Interior space is generous and good looking exterior
Handling is a bit on the soft side, good while going over bumps and normal driving. But there is no chance to hit a corner during the test drive, too many cars on the road.

1,8

Same build
Way better engine performance compare to the 1.6, but i still feel the altis/civic has better torque
Same interior, better leather
Same handling

Conclusion.
Overall is an ok car but I would go for the 1.6 low spec the only difference is the panaromic steering adjustment that most ppl do not need. But do note the VSC, its a good safety feature but not compulsory, been driving without 1 for years.

*Leather is shit, the 1.6 leather feels like plastic and cheap. The 1.8 supposedly nappa leather doesn't feel like it but its better than 1.6. I think the inspira 2.0 leather is way better than them.

Bad decision by SD, they should omit the leather or make it optional and slash 2k of the price.
*
Decent comment... kind of agree....

Yes, the 1.8 leather ar mix wt high n low quality... not like inspira full nappa...

Do have a look on those plastic use outside the car.... u comment urself... i dowan to talk too much...

And again.. yes, i very much prefer they use fabric instead of the plastic like leather in the 1.6...

If i drive the 1.6.. i think i will floor the paddle every time...


Added on March 31, 2012, 5:05 pm
QUOTE(kenso77 @ Mar 31 2012, 05:01 PM)
On the Sonata, there IS a difference .... since it was a company that was rented, 3 of my staffs tested with and without ECO Mode and the engine response is indeed different (even though the rev line remains similar). Do try to test it
with ECO on and off to confirm if this trait is also present in the Elantra
*
Tested both... i cant feel shit diff sorry captain..


Added on March 31, 2012, 5:12 pmThe roof line of this car... in the seat next to drive... since the seat cannot adjust up or down, head to roof space are less than my punch size. Probably less than 2inche... back sit... i sit straight... my palm put flat cannot go in.. i pull my neck a bit.. touxhing roof...

The front seat of this car is very slim hence make the back leg room decent...

This post has been edited by BuFung: Mar 31 2012, 05:12 PM
666devil
post Mar 31 2012, 06:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,624 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
So BF have u decide yet? Did ur SA give any discount?
ezee123
post Mar 31 2012, 06:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
69 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
For someone who used to be driving Kia Carens for the past 8 years, do you think she will find the Elantra 1.6 underpower?
mynewuser
post Mar 31 2012, 06:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,549 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Sungai Petani, Kedah


QUOTE(666devil @ Mar 31 2012, 06:28 PM)
So BF have u decide yet? Did ur SA give any discount?
*
still got SA working in Hyundai?
ar188
post Mar 31 2012, 06:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(BuFung @ Mar 31 2012, 03:41 PM)
Both 1.6 give very similar feeling...

Confirm forte 1.6sx n 2.0 c/w touch screen navigation..
*
so now forte ? biggrin.gif
caddilac
post Mar 31 2012, 06:45 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(ezee123 @ Mar 31 2012, 06:30 PM)
For someone who used to be driving Kia Carens for the past 8 years, do you think she will find the Elantra 1.6 underpower?
*
Carens 1.8 or 2.0?


Added on March 31, 2012, 6:53 pmIf Elantra 1.6 has similar performance with Forte 1.6SX, then I will be perfectly fine with it rclxms.gif
I found that 1.6HS also has sliding center console as in 1.8 but 1.8 don't have ECM...

This post has been edited by caddilac: Mar 31 2012, 06:55 PM
J_pandapuppet
post Mar 31 2012, 06:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


when I saw the car....
- appearance disappointing ohmy.gif
- feeling inside ain't solid, plastic sad.gif
- it got u thinking, 97k for a SKD....... mad.gif
- WASTED FREAKING 1 YEAR AND 3 MONTHS FOR THIS PLASTIC!!! cry.gif cry.gif cry.gif
seriously piece of crap for me vmad.gif

BYE BYE ELANTRA!!!

For you guys who don't mind the plastic feeling, go ahead for FORTE, seriously don't need to wait for this anymore! Such as waste of time!

128 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0172sec    0.47    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 04:50 AM