QUOTE(tonberry_ax @ Mar 12 2012, 02:24 PM)
I remember the N9 ninja got me excited a bit. U have no idea how much shuriken i've been collect.. lolz
I've seen many SGS2 / iphone user is originally from angry & disappointing Nokia user, no doubt Nokia has better build quality & camera stuff. But the OS i can tell is a piece of shit. I remember N97 era is the worst strategy that Nokia did, lousy symbian OS ever done, full of lag & everything. That time apple came out with the iphone, the OS icon attracts a lots of attraction, ppl start to jump ship, few years back android doing good too, & ppl jump ship again. And yet Nokia doesn't understand what user wants, perhaps the company is too big, a lots of decision have to approve by many layers.
Not long ago we've see MeeGo, it brings new hope to the mobile industry in terms of usability, then came out with this worthless elop come & kill it. Implement the WP7 drop the phone usability to almost zero. So are they forcing the remaining loyal Nokia customer to jump ship as well?
For Apple, what it first strike people is the smoothness; No other smartphones have this.
But then, there's the limitation and restrictions; but the tons of apps/games sort of make up for it plus, there is jailbreaking later.
As for Nokia Symbian, I primarily blame Nokia on going cheap on the hardware, especially the RAM and internal memory; I guess most of us knew that the main problem with most Nokia Symbian device is the lack of ram and internal memory, especially N97 (the mini version have larger memory).
But in terms of phone capability, Symbian is better than iOS anyday; It has better contact book features/function as well as messaging.
For iPhone, it's an media device (iPod Touch) with phone; so generally, it's a very simple, straightforward easy to use device. Compare a media player with a mobile computer, most people have no problems using a media player.
QUOTE(zachary22_77 @ Mar 12 2012, 02:45 PM)
I totally agree.
Anyway, I think the reason why target for new one more than try to retain old ones is simple, the new young ppl are louder & easier to influence. Remember, these are the ppl who more or less only know either Apple or Android these past 2 years & don't know Symbian/Windows Mobile. These are the ppl who clasify Symbian as old, slow & a dinosaur, no matter what polish you try to put on Symbian.
Haha yeah, N97 is really darn disappointing. But are you sure WP7 drop phone usability to almost zero? Have you tried one? Yes you are right in that Nokia became too big & decisions have to go through multiple layers which almost always means it reacts too slowly or the management can't see there's a prob at all. Just 2 years back all upper management in Nokia can't see shit one, all say everything is good.

The problem with most company is: Why choose only one when you can do both?
Maintain the old and get more NEW. They should already familiar and use the Windows Phone before, so they ownself should know the drawbacks (especially comparing what they currently have). They should push those MS to implement or provide solutions for those drawbacks before launching the device in order to minimize losses at the same time attract the new.
Now, I wonder how many new they can attract; Yes, they're louder and easier to influence, but at the same time, they can be very damaging; If they use and hated the restrictions and limitations, they can also be very loud to spread the drawbacks, and suggest to get an iPhone instead since both have similar restrictions and limitations.
New and Young is also more exposed and familiar with other OS, so they may have taste more; What makes it unique and special that Windows Phone OS compared to the rest?
Smoothness and Reliability, iPhone has it and it's more attractive phone and preferred choice to most people.
It looses to Android on the flexibility, customizations and freedom.
I may attract people who are:
1. Microsoft supporter?
2. Actually prefer the Live Tiles and UI and UX. But many people seems to consider it dull and boring, it's 2D flat look. Many people actually wants more options for customization or wallpaper options, interactive themes, etc.
3. Really into social networking and thus, the People Hub.
There maybe some people who like the speed/performance, but actually, I think iPhone is more simple with only 1 GOD button, 1 button to rule them all. Anything just press home.
Windows Phone more confusing and complicated with the 3 button, especially the back and windows button.
Back to go back-back-back until first then CLOSE. Windows button is like home button, it pauses the app on the background. Sometimes, press wrongly, accidentally CLOSE the app instead of pausing the app in the background, Ooops. And the annoying search button. People may not use or want it, so the button can be useless; what's more, accidentally pressing that, you will meet Mr. Bing again... and again... and again...
In terms of simplicity, iPhone does better in this department.
I like Windows Mobile, but was disappointed with this one as it didn't seem they make a mobile version of Windows, instead, it's like a very restrictive and controlled OS which is not the traits of Microsoft.
One thing I really like is the People Hub, but it still have much things to improve on.
QUOTE(tonberry_ax @ Mar 12 2012, 02:57 PM)
To be honest, i have tried WP7 for some time & trying to build some supporting apps, WP7 really only nice to look at it, but in terms of usability & connectivity that's really bad. So far if u ask me, I never seen any other OS with good usability come close to Meamo & MeeGo. sigh...
Well, it they actually make a mobile version of Windows then it's different story. This is no where close.
Same goes for Apple, imagine if the actually develop a mobile version of their Mac OS, instead of using the iPod Touch media OS.
QUOTE(loserkidz182 @ Mar 12 2012, 03:16 PM)
ooo...i almost forgot. contest from hitz.fm rite..thanks for your explanation. so window phone is a main OS for nokia now? but WP7 also running on some model HTC, LG. that mean WP7 OS not exclusive to nokia. i dont understand why nokia not focus on meego as their primary OS.
Yes, the main OS.
Don't say primary, even secondary or extra OS, also they don't want; MeeGo was killed before it was fully born/develop.
If Nokia has to find another OS to save them, why Windows Phone instead of Android? How do they justify Windows Phone is better than Android especially back then when Windows Phone isn't even mature yet?
Why need to kill MeeGo? How do they know MeeGo won't be successful? Why aren't they pushing and putting enough effort on MeeGo? It's pretty obvious how great is MeeGo OS especially with the swipe gesture. It can easily outclass the other OS, it has the smoothness on iPhone, yet it has the flexbility and power of Android. What it needs, is good source of apps and games. I don't see any good reason they should drop MeeGo?
Elop says by end of last year, they will only have 1 MeeGo device. So? Make more. They can come out with Lumia 900, which means it can run MeeGo as well. Why Windows Phone? Not like they can launch few Windows Phone last year? I still don't get it. This year, they could've launch many MeeGo phone if they stick to it, so what's the difference by dropping and using Windows Phone OS? It doesn't make the pace any faster? And now they gotta pay Microsoft? And have little control over what the OS can do? I really don't get the logic here.