QUOTE(stimix @ Feb 27 2012, 12:06 PM)
It's just amazing that >30yrs old lens can do such a great job that I don't think the newest, expensive NEX lenses can do well..haha..my 2sen
the bokeh is horrible though.The SONY NEX Discussion Thread V3
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 04:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 05:00 PM
|
|
Moderator
3,542 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong, Selangor |
Yeap I also placed an order of an ext tube for MD dy..Hopefully getting it within 3 wks time
QUOTE(Ah hao @ Feb 27 2012, 02:41 PM) suddenly remind of a thing call extension tube, it can shorten the minimum focus distance. but how well the effect i don know, nvr try b4 u try it then tell me the effect Added on February 27, 2012, 5:02 pmLooks better than the kit lens provided by NEX liao lor haha. For me I think it's good. Probbly it's my noob skill haha QUOTE(zstan @ Feb 27 2012, 04:58 PM) This post has been edited by stimix: Feb 27 2012, 05:02 PM |
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 05:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,619 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 05:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
The bokeh is messy. And very distracting.
|
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 05:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,619 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
Just google about sel 50mm f1.8, it is sooooo over price !!! Around rm 1000 (Usd 299 )for a 50mm 1.8? Omg....
Canon 50mm 1.8 = rm300++ nikon 50mm 1.8= rm400++ Sony 50mm 1.8= rm 500++ then nex 50mm 1.8 = 1000????!!!!! What are sony think about ? Added on February 27, 2012, 5:57 pm QUOTE(zstan @ Feb 27 2012, 05:53 PM) Its lens problem or i should set smaller f-value? This post has been edited by Ah hao: Feb 27 2012, 05:57 PM |
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 06:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,065 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(stimix @ Feb 27 2012, 12:48 PM) BTW, what I mean by hv to go far to get my food photo focused to the centre is like this and yet so close haha sumore that narrow focused area in the ctr at this F1.4. I using NEX-5N 4 month already.![]() Added on February 27, 2012, 12:52 pmfansoptian..can't read your exif via jeffre's exif viewer http://regex.info/exif.cgi?imgurl=http%3A%...177451131_n.jpg Meaning you also using NEX? I thought u're on Alpha SLT? from the alpha thread? |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 06:51 PM
|
|
Moderator
3,542 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong, Selangor |
Hmnnn I just like the feeling of bokeness.. Well, I dunno what zstan mean by messy bokeh but I just luv it..unless somewan wth SEL50F1.8 can get better than the so called messy bokeh? In the 1st place, isn't bokeh suppose to be very messy on the background haha
Added on February 27, 2012, 6:54 pmWah. likedat your earlier macro works all using 5N? darn those really good macro... U need to share abit of your technique of maroing wth NEX 5n dy haha QUOTE(fansoption @ Feb 27 2012, 06:08 PM) This post has been edited by stimix: Feb 27 2012, 06:54 PM |
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 07:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
790 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Ah hao @ Feb 27 2012, 05:56 PM) Just google about sel 50mm f1.8, it is sooooo over price !!! Around rm 1000 (Usd 299 )for a 50mm 1.8? Omg.... SEL50F18 have OSS. Canon 50mm 1.8 = rm300++ nikon 50mm 1.8= rm400++ Sony 50mm 1.8= rm 500++ then nex 50mm 1.8 = 1000????!!!!! What are sony think about ? Added on February 27, 2012, 5:57 pm Its lens problem or i should set smaller f-value? I tested AF is quite fast and sharp. |
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 07:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,619 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 07:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
790 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 08:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,619 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 08:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
790 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
It is old Konica mount. Before Minolta time. Alpha is follow minolta.
I got the lenses and adapter from ebay too. |
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 08:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,619 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 09:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
QUOTE(Ah hao @ Feb 27 2012, 05:56 PM) Just google about sel 50mm f1.8, it is sooooo over price !!! Around rm 1000 (Usd 299 )for a 50mm 1.8? Omg.... NEX 50mm is stabilised and has a better built. It's no brainier why it's more expensive. Canon 50mm 1.8 = rm300++ nikon 50mm 1.8= rm400++ Sony 50mm 1.8= rm 500++ then nex 50mm 1.8 = 1000????!!!!! What are sony think about ? Added on February 27, 2012, 5:57 pm Its lens problem or i should set smaller f-value? QUOTE(stimix @ Feb 27 2012, 06:51 PM) Hmnnn I just like the feeling of bokeness.. Well, I dunno what zstan mean by messy bokeh but I just luv it..unless somewan wth SEL50F1.8 can get better than the so called messy bokeh? In the 1st place, isn't bokeh suppose to be very messy on the background haha Haha. When u shoot more with expensive glass or see other people's pictures then u will understand what's creamy bokeh and messy bokeh.Added on February 27, 2012, 6:54 pmWah. likedat your earlier macro works all using 5N? darn those really good macro... U need to share abit of your technique of maroing wth NEX 5n dy haha |
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 09:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
790 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
sorry, before merged with Minolta became Konica-Minolta!
my lens is full metal body earlier type with F1.4-F16 which is around 1973. refer http://www.buhla.de/Foto/Konica/Objektive/e50_14.html it is recommended sharp lens. more details can find from http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=254&t=1948301&p=1 if u can read chinese. i still have other Konica Hexanon like legendary sharp lens 50/1.7 (early & later), 40/1.8, 57/1.4 (chrome ring),.... |
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 09:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,210 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Ah hao @ Feb 27 2012, 11:30 AM) first pic is nice, sharp and nice color I'm not a pro but with my experience with other pros, the first one: It's kinda sad that the front part of the wings are not focus but instead of blurred out. I really like your shots, stunt me for quite awhile actually (at first I was WOAHhhhh... and then I was nooo...), the contrast and sharpness is just great in my opinion. I love "his" eyes. Added on February 27, 2012, 11:30 am which version of sigma 70-210mm? i am finding a macro lens too, if focal length < 100mm, its hard to shoot animal except for some slow movements bugs, but if if not AF and OSS, >100mm is easily blur due to handshake... Dilemma Added on February 27, 2012, 11:32 amRisk my life for this shot, wild owl with 50mm lens, simply a step ahead i can reach "him" Please advice, am i overdoing the color/contrast/sharpness? CnC is greatly welcome » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Perhaps you can send your shots to flickr instead, because sometimes the image host will compress your images so best if you can upload your photos to flickr or photoshop.com This post has been edited by s7ran9er: Feb 27 2012, 09:31 PM |
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 09:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,619 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(s7ran9er @ Feb 27 2012, 09:30 PM) I'm not a pro but with my experience with other pros, the first one: It's kinda sad that the front part of the wings are not focus but instead of blurred out. I really like your shots, stunt me for quite awhile actually (at first I was WOAHhhhh... and then I was nooo...), the contrast and sharpness is just great in my opinion. I love "his" eyes. i deliberately out of focus its wings... if all was in focus then the bokeh will worse than now... outcome will be a more distracting background... nvm, i will try again tomorrow, hope the owl waiting for me there Perhaps you can send your shots to flickr instead, because sometimes the image host will compress your images so best if you can upload your photos to flickr or photoshop.com |
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 11:33 PM
|
|
Moderator
3,542 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong, Selangor |
For those going manual, this is a good long winded interesting article.. I spent almost 3 hrs digesting it while watching dramas haha
http://aggregate.org/DIT/OLDLENS/ I hope I will not be like this QUOTE Old manual focus lenses are highly addictive. The first time you pick one up, the mechanical quality hits home. Then you turn the focus ring. Wow! That sure felt good. Unbelievably smooth. Then you make the really big mistake. Thinking manual focus is cool, you try turning the manual focus ring on your favorite auto-focus lens. What the H*LL was that? Sloppy. Plastic. Yuck! The next thing you know, you've got a dozen old M42 lenses sitting next to you.... It's called LBA: Lens Buying Addiction. |
|
|
Feb 27 2012, 11:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,141 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Polaris Galaxy |
Fuyoh, suddenly everybody so active... Was awfully quiet last weekend
QUOTE(Ah hao @ Feb 25 2012, 06:50 PM) ya...the handling is bad for me Most tele lens usually like that, big and long and maybe heavy especially old ones with metal-build, really need a tripod if zoomed out. I bidded (and still winning atm) for the 1st version by Kiron, gonna need to start exercising my hands and arms as it's the heaviest of all when this lens attach to nex, i hold the lens instead of camera, if i hold on camera i really scare the mount will break apart and when focusing,i turn focus ring with 1 hand , hold the lens(camera) with another hand, then hand shake seriously till i always get blur picture maybe i have a chicken hand QUOTE(stimix @ Feb 27 2012, 12:31 PM) That one crop at F3.5? Yeah really wow..I think I must reduced my F from 1.4 to probably 2.8 or 4 too haha NEX has a crop factor of 1.5x so a 50mm (FX/full-frame format) lens would equal to ~75mm on our cams, not sure whether the adapter will affect anything though. Can always try a extension tube if you want close-ups, cheap and can be used with majority of lenses unlike filters which are limited by its thread size, 49mm cannot install on 55mm and vice-versa unless add step-up/step-down ring.One think I dun like about 50MM after using it for few days + the added adapter is the focal lenght permanently >50mm & wth the adapter probably 80MM? That's already any auto max zoom lens liao compare wth my existing 18-55 kit lens and if wanna shoot food picture, I need to sit further away from my food.. |
|
|
Feb 28 2012, 12:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,619 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(Dreamworks @ Feb 27 2012, 11:48 PM) Fuyoh, suddenly everybody so active... Was awfully quiet last weekend the lens is huge and heavy till i don dare to put my camera on the tripod Most tele lens usually like that, big and long and maybe heavy especially old ones with metal-build, really need a tripod if zoomed out. I bidded (and still winning atm) for the 1st version by Kiron, gonna need to start exercising my hands and arms as it's the heaviest of all NEX has a crop factor of 1.5x so a 50mm (FX/full-frame format) lens would equal to ~75mm on our cams, not sure whether the adapter will affect anything though. Can always try a extension tube if you want close-ups, cheap and can be used with majority of lenses unlike filters which are limited by its thread size, 49mm cannot install on 55mm and vice-versa unless add step-up/step-down ring. 1st version is larger and heavier than my tokina version, so... good luck to u |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0192sec
1.43
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 07:46 PM |