It's even better than the LX-3 which I started off with

The main point of getting a full frame cameras like the 6D is due to the bigger sensor. This is the main selling point. On how bigger sensor results in dramatically better image quality, I'm pretty sure you know of that already

Or you might want to take a step back because Canon has just announced their latest 70D where it comes with Wifi as well. Expect the price to be cheaper than the 7D when it was originally announced (might want to google for the price as I cannot remember)

Just to add: Brand NEW 20.2 megapixels sensor with Digic 5+, faster burst rate of 7fps, Wifi

Depending on the product line and the gap in age between the comparison, the difference can be from just minor updates to really significant improvements.

There might be a chance of improvement in the camera sensor which usually brings about better quality images. And if there is an enhancement in the built in image processor, you can find that the camera will perform better in low light situations (High ISO). There might also be improvements in auto focus performance, meaning you can focus on your subject quicker and never have to miss that moment Other improvements maybe a bigger lens aperture, faster max shutter speed limit, faster burst rate, weather proofing, etc etc.

And there's also the software part. "Magic" filters and many others which I'm usually not too keen on

At the end of the day, it's best to do research and read on the difference between the cameras you are comparing and whether this might benefit you or not.

This is quite vague, you need a lens but you are not sure what type of lens you are looking for?

Simple way to know is to look at the lens you are currently using. What makes you want to upgrade from that particular lens?

There are a lot of good tutorials on youtube, you can try adorama.tv, the presenter gives quite good explanation. I myself sometimes find them quite useful.

However if you want to make even more improvements, try to attend photography workshops and I mean the practical ones where the instructor will teach you on the spot

I think you can get a Nikon D5200 with your budget, or top up a little bit. Might want to price hunt around.

And ohh, make sure to get the kit lens as it would have optical stabilisation which will greatly help in videography as it reduces handshake.

I'd go with a mirrorless system as it would offer much better Image Quality. The NEX series from Sony should definitely be within your budget.

Hi, please follow the format on first page. Thanks

As this is a Nikon-specific question, might want to ask around Nikon buddies here: https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2897904

Sorry as I'm not familiar with the differences with both models.

Just one thing though, both cameras do not feature AF motor in the bodies, meaning you can only pair AF-S lenses with them.

Definitely a prosumer aka enthusiast compacts as there is no reason to get a conventional compact camera.

Canon S100/S110 is an OK camera as there are better choices, cameras which feature bigger apertures through out the focal length, better ergonomics and control.

Check out Lumix LX7, Olympus XZ2 and there's one from Nikon which I can't really recall.

If you want the best Image Quality the camera can give, definitely the NEX-3N. If you prefer a smaller camera with all-in-one functions, go for the RX100.

As for NFC or Wifi(?), you have to check the camera specifications whether they have it or not.

Honestly, with that budget, it'll be quite hard to recommend something that's the best in the market. RnD is more focused on higher end models, giving them distinguishing features such as a reasonably big sensor for a compact, 1/1.63", big apertures like f/1.4 or f/1.8, manual controls, dials and buttons that improve handling and other functions that will greatly help in photo-taking. For the lower end models, sadly there's nothing much to talk about. You can try asking around camera shops



Most cameras should feature a maximum shutter speed of about 1/2000 or slightly less, which is fast enough to capture a lot of quick moving objects.

As for the harsh flash, there's not much you can do except to DIY your own flash diffuser to soften the flash output. Or reduce the flash intensity which I don't know whether the lower end models allow that or not.

And ohh, most compacts *should* feature optical image stabilisation

Ahhh it has been a policy of making this thread specific only to camera recommendations Even questions on lens recommendations are advised to be asked in the specific camera brand threads like the Canon, Nikon, Sony topic, etc. It's in the main photography sub forum, you should be able to find it there.

Should be the upcoming P7800 http://www.dpreview.com/news/2013/09/05/ni...alent-f2-4-zoom

I also remember they're coming out with a compact camera with APS-C sized camera. Can't remember the model.

Full manual controls with easy access to controls, etc. Check out 2nd post on the first page.

Compact camera with fixed lenses: Oly XZ-2, Lumix LX7, Canon S110, Nikon P7800 (upcoming, price TBA)

You might be able to find some cheap, older m4/3 camera systems like the Olympus PEN series or the Panasonic GF series for that budget. These cameras have interchangeable lenses.

Canon 70D with kit lens should be only a few hundred more than RM3k I'd go for that if you can squeeze in more juice to your budget

Else, if you could get D7k with kit lens within that price range, it's a good deal too!

As for 60D vs D7k, might want to google more about this

Night scenery?

Here's what you NEED.

1) Entry level or mid range body.

Canon 650D/700D for about RM2k or a Nikon D5200 or an older D7000 body (please go hunt for prices and report back here)

A 2nd hand Canon 60D is also awesome, goes for about RM2-2.2k or so.

2) Decent tripod

Look at around RM200-500 depending on budget. What you need to look out for is a stable tripod with easy to use ballhead. I like the Manfrotto 496RC2 ballhead which goes for RM200-300

3) Optional- wireless/wired remote trigger [RM50-100]

4) Choice of lenses

For landscape, you can just use a standard kit lens or you can go ultra wide by getting a Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 for about RM1.5k new, Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 for RM2k+ or the Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 USM

For shooting macro, you can get the budget Tamron SP90mm f/2.8 for less than RM1k. Pretty good for the price!

Last but not least, getting a DSLR is not just about clicking the shutter button. There's quite a steep learning curve so expect yourself to be reading up articles online to know the triangle exposure: Aperture, Shutter Speed and ISO.

Good luck!

Usually 18-55 focal length is enough for most people but if you need the extra zoom length, the 18-135 would be a much better option. But remember, it is bigger and heavier.

Regarding the bolded statement, in my experience, they usually sell at RRP therefore, it is not worth it. However sometimes there may be good deals.

I usually go for the cheapest deal I can get, so best to look around. But I do avoid going to those "makeshift" kind of stalls, I go for the proper shops.

Kinda of a personal preference as there is no "right" lens for a certain situation.

There's a steep learning curve using the manual controls on a DSLR/advanced compact if you want to make full use of it. Else's there's always the Auto function which should be adequate for most general picture taking.

You can PM me personally if you want to know more, hope I can help in any way I can

There's really no reason not to opt for the A6000 amongst all of your options unless you're looking at the RX100 series for the portability factor

Definitely the Sony RX100 Mark II, should be able to get around that price. Or top up+wait for the Mark III version which is much better, faster lens, EVF, etc.

I'd get the Tokina 11-16 as it has quite good sharpness and the bigger max aperture. Distortion seems to be fine last I remembered, anyhow should be easily corrected in Post Processing.

Thing about waterproof cameras is that once you choose it, you have to live with the compromises that come with it. Usually won't be high end specs that you might expect from a camera around RM2k.

Best bet would be to get a good compact around RM1500-1600 and get a waterproof housing of some sort. You'd get better image quality than a waterproof camera.

The NEX5T is a better option than the A5000 due to better AF performance.

http://www.camera2u.com/Mirrorless-Camera/...port.html?pop=0

Supply is very limited since it's EOL but apparently you can still get it via that website.

RX100 is a good compact camera, more pocketable than the NEX cameras where you can actually fit it in your pocket with ease but image quality wise, there's no competition. The NEX cameras have much better image quality due to the larger sensors, you'll notice much better pictures in lower lighting conditions.

Need to go for 2nd hand cameras already if you want something good as your budget is a little low for a good low light camera. Do PM me and I'll see if I can help out more

Generic models around RM800 or below. Nothing special. Maybe a nice flippy screen or Wifi feature lol.

Could you get a D5200 with your budget?

Most entry level DSLRs are more than capable of getting the shots you want.

Some extra stuff that you might want to consider: Ultra wide angle lens, remote trigger (for timelapse or long exposure), external flash,etc.

Perhaps the Olympus XZ-1 or the Lumix LX5 if they're around your budget (search for it). Or top up a little more for bigger sensor cameras like some m4/3 system cameras. <--- You can easily get these 2nd hand for your budget (Garage Sales)

For your first question, you can easily google it.

Sensor wise, there is a big difference already. Also the AF performance, RX100 has just "okay" AF performance while as you know, A6000 is great in this aspect.

If you're getting into photography, I'd advise one to just grab ANY camera and start playing with it. Most important thing about photography is the thought process/idea/composition/concept/framing instead of the gear, though better gears may help you in your work.

Just go for the best you can afford and bear in mind of the extra accessories like lenses/flash/bag/etc that you would need to factor into your budget.

How portable do you want it to be? If I want something in my jeans/pants, I'd go for the RX100, else I'd go for Sony's NEX system.

Not to nitpick, the term is "compact camera" and not "digital camera" because your 60D is a digital camera also right?

Try to look around Garage Sales for some good deals on DSLRs and then refer it back here or PM me.

Not to be unhelpful but you need to do some homework too

There's no other compact camera at the level of the RX100 and yet can fit into jeans pocket. There's the Canon S120 but the sensor is much smaller.

One of the nice things about the lens is the aperture range when zoomed in! And you get a newer sensor and a pop up EVF

If the RX100 can shoot RAW, it would definitely be better to process compared to JPG as you have more control over your images. Recovering highlights/shadows would depend on the dynamic range and the amount of detail the camera can capture. You might want to download some RX100 RAW images and play with it a bit.

Yes, the LX7 is better than the LX5 but I'm afraid that it's much pricier. You can still do a price check on it though. Try shashinki.com, camera2u, lelong.

These enthusiast cameras are really good for the price. You can also dabble with the manual controls which give you better control over what result you might want. A good stepping stone into the mirrorless/DSLR world I should say (speaking from experience )