QUOTE(Mr.Lonely @ Jan 25 2012, 09:36 PM)
I have a Liteon too on post #132.For my SATA II score.
The SSD Thread V2, Faster Better Greener Unbreakable!
|
|
Jan 25 2012, 10:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
913 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Butterworth, Penang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2012, 02:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
946 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
Have you guys heard of fancy cache? http://www.romexsoftware.com/en-us/fancy-cache/
You can cache all your date from your HD onto your SSD/ram-disk; kind of like the OCZ synapse. Seems like all these caching programs and new hardware are going to be the next big thing. |
|
|
Jan 26 2012, 10:24 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
72 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: Harlem Street |
QUOTE(amenlo9 @ Jan 25 2012, 09:20 PM) your score still very high....i am using Corsair Force 3 120GB Sata 3 on Sata 2 port but only managed to get 167MB read and 100MB write. I got a few question want to ask expert here as below: As your force 3 will only run on ide mode not even sata 1 speed.Currently running force GT 90GB & 120GB on sata 2 board with 280MB read and 272MB write,that's the max speed a sata 2 ssd can get.TRIM is enable only when you set it on win 7(even without achi),not the entire ssd.a) Will it because my mobo dont support ACHI so the speed is so slow? b) Any effect by using it for dual OS booting? Using it with 3 partitions : OSX Lion 1| Lion 2| Win7 c) besides, TRIM is enabled inside Win 7. This partition is about 60GB. But inside OSX cant support TRIM. In this situation, TRIM is covered 60GB under Win 7 or is covered whole SSD? Ps:Ts,pls look for post #77(page 4) to be include in the list. |
|
|
Jan 26 2012, 10:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,461 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Kota Bharu,Kelantan |
Guys,would something like a Crucial M4 feel faster in real life situations compared to a Intel G2 ?
I was wondering whether the speed is noticeable or not since the M4 is about 2 times faster than the G2 in Crystaldiskmark This post has been edited by Racerx: Jan 26 2012, 10:38 AM |
|
|
Jan 26 2012, 11:49 AM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(Racerx @ Jan 26 2012, 10:37 AM) Guys,would something like a Crucial M4 feel faster in real life situations compared to a Intel G2 ? I was wondering whether the speed is noticeable or not since the M4 is about 2 times faster than the G2 in Crystaldiskmark In fact raid0 M4 vs G2 would not make any difference at all. All of them have less than 1 ms access time. but buying these M4s is not a waste, coz i use it for competition like PCMark7 & won prizes |
|
|
Jan 26 2012, 12:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,304 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: A place |
QUOTE(Shufflerz @ Jan 25 2012, 10:35 PM) notedQUOTE(PandoraV @ Jan 26 2012, 10:24 AM) As your force 3 will only run on ide mode not even sata 1 speed.Currently running force GT 90GB & 120GB on sata 2 board with 280MB read and 272MB write,that's the max speed a sata 2 ssd can get.TRIM is enable only when you set it on win 7(even without achi),not the entire ssd. notedPs:Ts,pls look for post #77(page 4) to be include in the list. QUOTE(Racerx @ Jan 26 2012, 10:37 AM) Guys,would something like a Crucial M4 feel faster in real life situations compared to a Intel G2 ? by right if using normally without breaking the benchmarks, G2 and M4 wont make any different as they r SSD and u will feel faster then conventional HDDI was wondering whether the speed is noticeable or not since the M4 is about 2 times faster than the G2 in Crystaldiskmark |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2012, 03:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,627 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sepang,Cheras,Jupiter |
QUOTE(PandoraV @ Jan 26 2012, 10:24 AM) As your force 3 will only run on ide mode not even sata 1 speed.Currently running force GT 90GB & 120GB on sata 2 board with 280MB read and 272MB write,that's the max speed a sata 2 ssd can get.TRIM is enable only when you set it on win 7(even without achi),not the entire ssd. thanks for your info. mind to tell me why my SSD only running on IDE mode? is it because of motherboard limitation?Ps:Ts,pls look for post #77(page 4) to be include in the list. I am using budget mobo below: http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-p...spx?pid=3960#ov Both hardisk seem like display as ATA device. but i do have SATA controller on my mobo This post has been edited by amenlo9: Jan 26 2012, 04:07 PM |
|
|
Jan 26 2012, 04:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
18,503 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: P.Jaya |
QUOTE(amenlo9 @ Jan 26 2012, 03:22 PM) thanks for your info. mind to tell me why my SSD only running on IDE mode? is it because of motherboard limitation? Read post #137.I am using budget mobo below: http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-p...spx?pid=3960#ov Your board has 4 x SATA 3Gb/s connectors supporting up to 4 SATA 3Gb/s devices . After change in Windows and BIOS (AHCI),you must install Intel® Rapid Storage Manager (10.8.0.1003): http://downloadmirror.intel.com/20710/eng/...10.8.0.1003.exe This post has been edited by stasio: Jan 26 2012, 04:13 PM |
|
|
Jan 26 2012, 04:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,627 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sepang,Cheras,Jupiter |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2012, 04:17 PM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(amenlo9 @ Jan 26 2012, 03:22 PM) thanks for your info. mind to tell me why my SSD only running on IDE mode? is it because of motherboard limitation? I am using budget mobo below: http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-p...spx?pid=3960#ov update your mobo chipset driver aka INF. G41 mobo supports IDE only but won't be that far behind AHCI. i'd say the mobo as well as the CPU are limiting the speed. SSD in IDE vs AHCI This post has been edited by owikh84: Jan 26 2012, 04:18 PM |
|
|
Jan 26 2012, 04:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
18,503 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: P.Jaya |
Yeah,your mobo only IDE mode.
|
|
|
Jan 26 2012, 08:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,627 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sepang,Cheras,Jupiter |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 26 2012, 04:17 PM) update your mobo chipset driver aka INF. yup. updated to latest INF still the same..... G41 mobo supports IDE only but won't be that far behind AHCI. i'd say the mobo as well as the CPU are limiting the speed. SSD in IDE vs AHCI at first i thought since it got SATA 2 port sure will have SATA's speed. din't know G41 only support IDE speed on SATA's port. kinda weird but still that the best new LGA775 mobo i can buy from the shop since no more mid-high range LGA775 mobo in production anymore. still kinda waste under utilized so much more. This post has been edited by amenlo9: Jan 27 2012, 11:38 PM |
|
|
Jan 27 2012, 12:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
540 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: penang,KL |
http://www.ocztechnology.com/ocz-agility-3...ii-2-5-ssd.html
http://www.mushkin.com/Digital-Storage/SSD...SSDCR120GB.aspx wanna ask which one perform better ?? reliability ? both price almost same ! |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2012, 09:04 AM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(amenlo9 @ Jan 26 2012, 08:26 PM) kinda still kinda waste under utilized so much more. It's ok. The SSD is still playing its role to be A LOT faster than any conventional HDD. Access/seek time under 1ms is more important & noticeable during apps loading. |
|
|
Jan 27 2012, 11:02 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,591 posts Joined: Feb 2008 |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 27 2012, 09:04 AM) It's ok. The SSD is still playing its role to be A LOT faster than any conventional HDD. Access/seek time under 1ms is more important & noticeable during apps loading. +1All this chasing for top performance seems quite unnecessary, because 90% of the performance difference that you can feel can be had with any SSD. It'll be an extremely rare occasion when you can feel the value of 500MB/s read/write. |
|
|
Jan 27 2012, 01:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
913 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Butterworth, Penang |
Houston, we have a problem.
Shufflerz | Samsung 470 Series | 256GB Here's the story. I did a fresh OS install on THIS M17X in the SSD. Once installed, without any setting, straight away I CrystalDiskMark and get this. ![]() After that I checked on bios and I realized it is on RAID mode instead of AHCI. Immediately I changed it and did another fresh install. And after installed all the drivers, I did the optimization thingy on 1st post, and this is what I get. ![]() Drop performance after optimized? Enlighten me. |
|
|
Jan 27 2012, 02:08 PM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(Shufflerz @ Jan 27 2012, 01:46 PM) Houston, we have a problem. The optimization steps sometimes can hurt the performance.Shufflerz | Samsung 470 Series | 256GB Here's the story. I did a fresh OS install on THIS M17X in the SSD. Once installed, without any setting, straight away I CrystalDiskMark and get this. After that I checked on bios and I realized it is on RAID mode instead of AHCI. Immediately I changed it and did another fresh install. And after installed all the drivers, I did the optimization thingy on 1st post, and this is what I get. Drop performance after optimized? Enlighten me. I'm not sure which step is the culprit may be u could sort it out one by one with restore point set or revert to default settings. This post has been edited by owikh84: Jan 27 2012, 02:08 PM |
|
|
Jan 27 2012, 02:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
913 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Butterworth, Penang |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 27 2012, 02:08 PM) The optimization steps sometimes can hurt the performance. I don't have overwhelmed PC knowledge, so some settings I just blindly follow only.I'm not sure which step is the culprit may be u could sort it out one by one with restore point set or revert to default settings. What setting are you using? |
|
|
Jan 27 2012, 02:18 PM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(Shufflerz @ Jan 27 2012, 02:13 PM) I don't have overwhelmed PC knowledge, so some settings I just blindly follow only. i followed exactly all the steps from the Optimization Guide; except for the pagefile in which i needed it for some games ie. Dirt3 etc...What setting are you using? then the SSD gives lower score than before optimization. This post has been edited by owikh84: Jan 27 2012, 02:20 PM |
|
|
Jan 27 2012, 02:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
913 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Butterworth, Penang |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 27 2012, 02:18 PM) i followed exactly all the steps from the Optimization Guide; except for the pagefile in which i needed it for some games ie. Dirt3 etc... I did not turn off the write buffer thingy.then the SSD gives lower score than before optimization. Because during 1st run with buffer off, the result is worse, get like 7;12 for 4k write. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0343sec
0.26
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 03:28 AM |