QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Dec 13 2011, 09:26 PM)
maybe he is adi profession in his field dat he can handle all d setting depends on d lighting...
well...
dat's him...
dat's his personal style i would say...
and i quite enjoy looking @ some of his masterpiece...
btw...
if u r using RAW & open in lightroom...
u can't get d original colour from Nikon...
i mean like what u see in ur LCD...
Whichever it is, it's each person preferences. Don't be confined or limited to something when we have options and flexibility. It doesn't mean choosing either way a person cannot be better. Most true professionals or expert can get it right and do everything perfectly in camera, but do you think they don't agree in doing editing or shooting raw?
Yes, Nikon has their own profile, so does other manufacturer. For lightroom, default colour profile is Adobe, you can change to Camera Standard, Camera Vivid, etc and see different colour, and you can also make further adjustments, it all depends on how you like to tweak to your liking and preferences; there's a lot of explore and learn/know. Even from your camera itself, choosing different profile will give your different colour output (e.g. portrait, standard, etc). If you want Nikon colour, there's Nikon Capture NX.
Anyway, it's all about preference; Even exposure, some prefer darker, some prefer brighter; which both have it's uniqueness, so how do you define RIGHT or WRONG? You may shoot with correct WB, but some people prefer the warmer colour (yellow lighting feel), again is it right or wrong? This is an art, not science, it's not 1 + 1=2.
BUT, if it's a good photo is a good photo, it's just how good to each person.
Given 100 photos to 100 people, not everyone may like the same photo, but there maybe one photo which more people choose.
Given 1 single photo edited with different exposure/style/colour/tone/etc to 100 people, not everyone may choose the same one, but there maybe one that most people prefer.
Look at froknowsphoto, see how many different editing can produce by different person given a raw file and how different people will like different result. With RAW, you have more flexibility of producing many different output for a given raw file.
Added on December 13, 2011, 10:13 pmQUOTE(gerald7 @ Dec 13 2011, 10:02 PM)
its RAW the color tat ran away (hehe) in lightroom is actually with out color profiles, less sharp, less contrast but more information. it is as the name implies, RAW information. compare the jpg file size vs raw. Jpg is a compressed format. maybe thats why i seldom shoot raw, so many things to tweak n put back...headache i see it ... but in bad lighting conditions its a life saver
Before digital era, if RAW is like Negative, then Jpeg is something like those Polaroid that produce/print picture right away.
That why I say depends on condition, if shooting for wedding/actions, etc. there maybe no time to adjust this and that, even shooting in manual is also not easy, even shooting in A/S/P mode, it doesn't mean it can be correct as well, the metering can still be fooled, in the same room, just changing different angle or moving slightly may affect the camera WB settings. I believe those who have experience it will understand what I'm talking about; if you're editing the raw file, you may notice a certain photo suddenly require major adjustment to the WB from the rest, it's just so happen that you're at the spot that may have produce warmer or cooler tones, even you're in the same room/place.
This post has been edited by Andy214: Dec 13 2011, 10:13 PM