Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
125 Pages « < 55 56 57 58 59 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Astro B.yond Episode IV (Version 9.0), The New World of Entertainment

views
     
jamesleetech
post Mar 29 2012, 08:55 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
684 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


QUOTE(smileguy @ Mar 29 2012, 06:15 PM)
Pay-TV companies are always at the mercy of content providers. So costs are rising faster than revenue,” said an analyst with an investment bank in Kuala Lumpur. “On top of that there is more competition now with other providers and IPTV is increasingly becoming the norm around the world. Satellite TV is dying,” he added. — Reuters 

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/busines...ing-pay-tv-ipo/

Good times are coming to a close? hmm.gif

Smileguy, my thanks for bringing this "fascinating" news here.

Here's a portion of what Ananda stated...
"Pay-TV companies are always at the mercy of content providers. So costs are rising faster than revenue," said an analyst with an investment bank in Kuala Lumpur. "On top of that there is more competition now with other providers and IPTV is increasingly becoming the norm around the world. Satellite TV is dying," he added.

Ananda mentioned that an analyst stated that Pay-TV costs are rising faster than revenue. Then Ananda added more... "on top of that (analyst statement)" ... that IPTV is increasingly becoming the norm and Satellite TV is dying. Only Ananda said that the "Satellite TV is dying" which the analyst did not mention.

I really wonder what tycoon Ananda is trying to say.

If I was the reporter who interviewed him for that story, I would have asked him many questions that would make him look stupid for such comments !

Below should be the type of questions and comments that I would express to him...

First and foremost... remember the old days when wooden telephone poles was used to hang phone cables so... does he know how long it took for Telekom to install this infrastructure to the whole nation ? How many years did many small towns in Malaysia have to wait just to have phone service ?

After many years, does Ananda know how long it took for towns nationwide to change phone poles to underground phone cables? Even today, some small towns still use phone poles. The phone infrastructure was progressively changed by Telekom from phone poles to underground phone cables which took many many years to complete nationwide.

Where did Ananda get the actual statistics to comment that "Satellite TV is dying" ?

He should be the first person to know that installing the full infrastructure to use underground fiber cables is much much more expensive because of costs of the fiber cables, ports and routers, distributors, etc. Note: I am referring to the underground fiber cables outside our homes, internal wiring in our homes don't use fiber cables.

Each fiber cable for IPTV is limited to a number of users it can support. So the IPTV providers have to estimate how many cables to lay underground that is enough for future demand. It cost money to dig again to add more cables.

Although the full infrastructure for Satellite TV/Radio cost billions of ringgit, its coverage is immediately available nationwide... and don't depend on the population size in any towns or location areas. IPTV or Cable TV companies will have to survey first and then decide whether its commercially possible to provide underground fiber cables for small towns with small population, such as 50,000 residents in a small town. I really think these companies will NEVER install the expensive fiber cables to small kampungs (with only a few hundred people in each kampung and these kampungs are spread in a large area) ! In the case of Satellite TV, there is no such "decision" to make because its completely not necessary. Just go to any kampung home, install the Sat decoder+dish and thats it !

Even in advanced countries such as USA, NOT ALL towns, townships, suburbs in their entire vast country have Cable TV or IPTV ! I know this as a fact. All of us do know just how BIG the USA is ! Yes, I agree that IPTV and Cable TV is readily available now in many cities in US but it will never be possible to cover the entire US nationwide. This is where Satellite TV plays such an important role because its readily available to a very large area that each satellite is located in the "sky above".

So I must really criticise Ananda because I truly wonder just where he got this nonsense and absolute crap that he stupidly believe that "Satellite TV is dying". There is a chance that I could be wrong BUT if Ananda is right in front of me now, I will still challenge him to prove to me with evidence and actual statistics that support his stupid opinion that Sat TV is dying !

Of course everyone wants IPTV or Cable TV. Who doesn't ? Of course I WANT IT !!! As I have mentioned many times before, will it be possible and how long do we have to wait for IPTV or Cable TV to be available nationwide? I know no one suggested it but it will be very stupid to suggest stopping Satellite TV right now, and put the people in the whole nation in limbo who then stupidly wait for many many unknown years for something that may never come for many rakyat in smaller towns !

If anyone here feels whatever I have mentioned here is not correct, I will not be offended and don't mind if anyone corrected me, hehe.

My apologies to smileguy... for my "heated" reply here. I mean no offense to you. I am NOT pointing my sarcasms and criticisms at you but directed at Ananda for his rather careless and stupid statement. OMG ! doh.gif

NEW ADDITION
The kind gentleman "anfieldude" later posted a reply about my error so I have posted my reply at Post 1127...
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=ST&f=198&t=2114557&st=1127#

I have replied with further explanations that its still ridiculous to claim that "Satellite TV is dying" so please read it. Part of my reply include... "Yes, I publicly convey my apology to Ananda only for the part of the statement that did not come from his mouth."


This post has been edited by jamesleetech: Mar 30 2012, 12:08 AM
kaspersky-fan
post Mar 29 2012, 08:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,602 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
but if im not mistaken... its only rm30 cheaper for astro packages..

what channels are you into anyway?
krel89
post Mar 29 2012, 09:05 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
409 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(kaspersky-fan @ Mar 29 2012, 08:57 PM)
but if im not mistaken... its only rm30 cheaper for astro packages..

what channels are you into anyway?
*
SP 1..


Added on March 29, 2012, 9:13 pm
QUOTE(jamesleetech @ Mar 29 2012, 08:55 PM)
Smileguy, my thanks for bringing this "fascinating" news here.

I really wonder what tycoon Ananda is trying to say.

If I was the reporter who interviewed him for that story, I would have asked him many questions that would make him look stupid for such comments !

Below should be the type of questions and comments that I would express to him...

First and foremost... remember the old days when wooden telephone poles was used to hang phone cables so... does he know how long it took for Telekom to install this infrastructure to the whole nation ? How many years did many small towns in Malaysia have to wait just to have phone service ?

After many years, does Ananda know how long it took for towns nationwide to change to underground phone cables? Even today, some small towns still use phone poles. The phone infrastructure was progressively changed by Telekom from phone poles to underground phone cables which took many many years to complete nationwide.

Where did Ananda get the actual statistics to comment that "Satellite TV is dying" ?

He should be the first person to know that installing the full infrastructure to use underground fiber cables is much much more expensive because of costs of the fiber cables, ports and routers, distributors, etc. Note: I am referring to the underground fiber cables outside our homes, internal wiring in our homes don't use fiber cables.

Each fiber cable for IPTV is limited to a number of users it can support. So the IPTV providers have to estimate how many cables to lay underground that is enough for future demand. It cost money to dig again to add more cables.

Although the full infrastructure for Satellite TV/Radio cost billions of ringgit, its coverage is immediately available nationwide... and don't depend on the population size in any towns or location areas. IPTV or Cable TV companies will have to survey first and then decide whether its commercially possible to provide underground fiber cables for small towns with small population, such as 50,000 residents in a small town. I really think these companies will NEVER install the expensive fiber cables to small kampungs (with only a few hundred people in each kampung and these kampungs are spread in a large area) ! In the case of Satellite TV, there is no such "decision" to make because its completely not necessary. Just go to any kampung home, install the Sat decoder+dish and thats it !

Even in advanced countries such as USA, NOT ALL towns, townships, suburbs in their entire vast country have Cable TV or IPTV ! I know this as a fact. All of us do know just how BIG the USA is ! Yes, I agree that IPTV and Cable TV is readily available now in many cities in US but it will never be possible to cover the entire US nationwide. This is where Satellite TV plays such an important role because its readily available to a very large area that each satellite is located in the "sky above".

So I must really criticise Ananda because I truly wonder just where he got this nonsense and absolute crap that he stupidly believe that "Satellite TV is dying". There is a chance that I could be wrong BUT if Ananda is right in front of me now, I will still challenge him to prove to me with evidence and actual statistics that support his stupid opinion that Sat TV is dying !

Of course everyone wants IPTV or Cable TV. Who doesn't ? Of course I WANT IT !!! As I have mentioned many times before, will it be possible and how long do we have to wait for IPTV or Cable TV to be available nationwide? I know no one suggested it but it will be very stupid to suggest stopping Satellite TV right now, and put the people in the whole nation in limbo who then stupidly wait for many many unknown years for something that may never come for many rakyat in smaller towns !

If anyone here feels whatever I have mentioned here is not correct, I will not be offended and don't mind if anyone corrected me, hehe.

My apologies to smileguy... for my "heated" reply here. I mean no offense to you. I am NOT pointing my sarcasms and criticisms at you but directed at Ananda for his rather careless and stupid statement. OMG !  doh.gif
*
maybe he take example in singapore?? hahahahah yawn.gif



This post has been edited by krel89: Mar 29 2012, 09:21 PM
jamesleetech
post Mar 29 2012, 09:50 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
684 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


QUOTE(krel89 @ Mar 29 2012, 09:05 PM)
maybe he take example in singapore?? hahahahah yawn.gif

Hehe... you are assuming that Ananda took example from Singapore. Its ok for expressing your thoughts.

Singapore is a small island country so definitely its so much easier to build the necessary infrastructure for Cable TV and IPTV. The situation is very different for countries with a much much larger area such as Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia. As I have mentioned before, there are various difficulties and reasons why Cable TV and IPTV may not be possible for nationwide coverage.

If Ananda wish to use example, he can also choose Liechtenstein, which is one of the smallest country in the world with only 62 sq. miles of about 34,000 population which is located on the Rhine River between Switzerland and Austria in the Alps. It will be much much much more easier to start Cable TV and IPTV there, LOL !

It will also be ridiculous and very stupid IF Ananda compare Malaysia with Singapore. I will also mention the same reasons as I have stated in my earlier post !

smile.gif

This post has been edited by jamesleetech: Mar 29 2012, 10:00 PM
krel89
post Mar 29 2012, 10:11 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
409 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(jamesleetech @ Mar 29 2012, 09:50 PM)
Hehe... you are assuming that Ananda took example from Singapore. Its ok for expressing your thoughts.

Singapore is a small island country so definitely its so much easier to build the necessary infrastructure for Cable TV and IPTV. The situation is very different for countries with a much much larger area such as Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia. As I have mentioned before, there are various difficulties and reasons why Cable TV and IPTV may not be possible for nationwide coverage.

If Ananda wish to use example, he can also choose Liechtenstein, which is one of the smallest country in the world with only 62 sq. miles of about 34,000 population which is located on the Rhine River between Switzerland and Austria in the Alps. It will be much much much more easier to start Cable TV and IPTV there, LOL !

It will also be ridiculous and very stupid IF Ananda compare Malaysia with Singapore. I will also mention the same reasons as I have stated in my earlier post !

smile.gif
*
haha.. if only direct tv available here.. 1st channel subsribe, is Adult channel.. hahahaha confirm my PVR HD full with that channel only
anfieldude
post Mar 29 2012, 10:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(jamesleetech @ Mar 29 2012, 08:55 PM)
Smileguy, my thanks for bringing this "fascinating" news here.

Here's a portion of what Ananda stated...
"Pay-TV companies are always at the mercy of content providers. So costs are rising faster than revenue," said an analyst with an investment bank in Kuala Lumpur. "On top of that there is more competition now with other providers and IPTV is increasingly becoming the norm around the world. Satellite TV is dying," he added.

Ananda mentioned that an analyst stated that Pay-TV costs are rising faster than revenue. Then Ananda added more... "on top of that (analyst statement)" ... that IPTV is increasingly becoming the norm and Satellite TV is dying. Only Ananda said that the "Satellite TV is dying" which the analyst did not mention.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
james,

Re-read the article. An unnamed source from Usaha Tegas made that comment not AK...
jamesleetech
post Mar 29 2012, 11:16 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
684 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


QUOTE(anfieldude @ Mar 29 2012, 10:15 PM)
james,

Re-read the article. An unnamed source from Usaha Tegas made that comment not AK...

Thanks for your input. I re-read the article carefully. All my reply here is only about the "Satellite TV is dying" statement.

Ananda started Usaha Tegas and practically owns and control this company. The unnamed source is an official from this company who declined to be named due to ongoing discussions. That official did NOT state it was a personal opinion. So, any comments from within Usaha Tegas who made such ridiculous comment on "Sat TV is dying" means that Usaha Tegas is partly or wholely responsible for its own official's statement.

Yes, I publicly convey my apology to Ananda only for the part of the statement that did not come from his mouth. However, Ananda is wholely responsible for any official or unofficial statements that came from within Usaha Tegas... although Ananda did not deny or confirm the "statement" by the unnamed Usaha Tegas official which was reported by Reuters and published by The Malaysian Insider.

However, the ongoing unconfirmed direction and discussions by Usaha Tegas towards IPO ...and... the unnamed official statement from Usaha Tegas, means that I can reasonably be led to believe that Ananda (who controls the company) have the same believe that the "Satellite TV is dying".

I did not clarify clearly and wrongly stated that the "Satellite TV is dying" came from Ananda himself.

Whether it came from an unnamed official, whoever, or whomsoever or Ananda himself and as long as its a frivolous and uncollaborated statement coming from within Usaha Tegas, ... the "Satellite TV is dying" statement is ridiculous when they fully knew that satellite TV plays a crucial role for nationwide coverage and therefore is NOT dying as allegedly claimed. Yes, I fully agree that Sat TV is affected by cable IPTV and the trend is moving towards IPTV but to claim that satellite TV is dying is an overstatement in itself.

Reference on Ananda ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ananda_Krishnan

This post has been edited by jamesleetech: Mar 29 2012, 11:41 PM
jamesleetech
post Mar 29 2012, 11:42 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
684 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


QUOTE(krel89 @ Mar 29 2012, 10:11 PM)
haha.. if only direct tv available here.. 1st channel subsribe, is Adult channel.. hahahaha confirm my PVR HD full with that channel only

Hehe... normal behaviour for me but not everyone have the same opinion. If DirecTV is available and installed in your home, can I cum to your house ? Ooops... correction... can I come to your house ? brows.gif

This post has been edited by jamesleetech: Mar 29 2012, 11:42 PM
smileguy
post Mar 30 2012, 06:41 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,147 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(jamesleetech @ Mar 29 2012, 11:42 PM)
Hehe... normal behaviour for me but not everyone have the same opinion. If DirecTV is available and installed in your home, can I cum to your house ? Ooops... correction... can I come to your house ?  brows.gif
*
That was a joke rclxm9.gif
Well , who said satelite tv is dying is not the issue but infact it is,Astro wl incur more costs end of the day.IPTV has variety ,a good internet connection and the world is yours.All astro cld do was go nationwide besides that what did it achieve,rain fade phased it out.If no monopoly astro wld hv died long ago,just with competetitors about to start and astro has felt the heat.The main idea to go into satelite is to lease transponders ,here is where their money is! sweat.gif
RAMChYLD
post Mar 30 2012, 10:05 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,715 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Klang


QUOTE(smileguy @ Mar 30 2012, 06:41 AM)
That was a joke  rclxm9.gif
Well , who said satelite tv is dying is not the issue but infact it is,Astro wl incur more costs end of the day.IPTV has variety ,a good internet connection and the world is yours.All astro cld do was go nationwide besides that what did it achieve,rain fade phased it out.If no monopoly astro wld hv died long ago,just with competetitors about to start and astro has felt the heat.The main idea to go into satelite is to lease transponders ,here is where their money is! sweat.gif
*
Assteruk's greed made them make a lot of wrong decisions. Assteruk chose Ku Band instead of other more resilient bands, probably because receiver and transmitter system cheaper (or SKMM won't let them use other bands). There is also warning by ITU that Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia not suitable for Ku Band deployment. They ignore.

Agree with smileguy, assteruk sub probably make up only a small portion of their income. The rest comes from leasing out bandwidth on MEASAT to content providers by their sister company (and yet they complain not enough bandwidth...)

This post has been edited by RAMChYLD: Mar 30 2012, 10:07 AM
smileguy
post Mar 30 2012, 10:32 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,147 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
ku band was tragedy, the idea to go for ku band was maybe mainly its easy to spot the dishes up there ,to stop us from using dishes alike to get FTA,secondly the satelite launch was targetted to serve other countries for leasing business.Measat is almost fully leased to india with no more space for own use!We are the idiots now watching compressed and not so HD channels sad.gif

This post has been edited by smileguy: Mar 30 2012, 10:33 AM
Qash-M
post Mar 30 2012, 10:44 AM

#FreePalestine
*******
Senior Member
6,103 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
From: Marang, Terengganu



QUOTE(smileguy @ Mar 30 2012, 10:32 AM)
ku band was tragedy, the idea to go for ku band was  maybe mainly its easy to spot the dishes up there ,to stop us from using dishes alike to get FTA,secondly the satelite launch was targetted to serve other countries for leasing business.Measat  is almost fully leased  to india with no more space for own use!We are  the idiots now watching compressed and not so HD channels sad.gif
*
Over +9000 for that. nod.gif sweat.gif
skylinelover
post Mar 30 2012, 11:06 AM

Future Crypto Player😄👊Driver Abamsado😎😎
********
All Stars
11,244 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
hahaha that is y i going 2 cancel astro soon n switch unifi once the dam thing available in my area laugh.gif rclxms.gif whatever is on astro i can get more than that on the internet hahaha
smileguy
post Mar 30 2012, 11:47 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,147 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(skylinelover @ Mar 30 2012, 11:06 AM)
hahaha that is y i going 2 cancel astro soon n switch unifi once the dam thing available in my area laugh.gif rclxms.gif whatever is on astro i can get more than that on the internet hahaha
*
This is the reply i got today ,

Dear Mr. ,

Thank you for contacting TM UniFi.

Referring to your e-mail dated 29th March 2012 on UniFi availability and upon checking system, we regret to inform that your address as per previous e-mail is currently not under UniFi coverage area at this moment. However, we are adding FDCs (Fibre Drop Cabinets) as fast as we can. We are deploying new areas all the time. Some sections of a city may get service before others. It’s all dependent on how fast we can dig and lay cable in a given neighborhood, and get the required hardware in place. We are currently unable to give better estimation time.
sweat.gif
Maybe FDC may help to serve all towns and maybe areas within 5km radius

This post has been edited by smileguy: Mar 30 2012, 11:49 AM
RAMChYLD
post Mar 30 2012, 12:41 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,715 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Klang


That's the big problem with UniFi and ABN

Fiber fail.

Wait for fiber rollout takes forever. They should at least let people use the decoder with other ISPs in "limited mode" ie crap QVGA video out and no HD. But no, they insist on locking down. Hence failing to gain market share.
SUSlogit85
post Mar 30 2012, 12:42 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,814 posts

Joined: Dec 2008



QUOTE(smileguy @ Mar 30 2012, 11:47 AM)
This is the reply i got today ,

Dear Mr. ,

Thank you for contacting TM UniFi.

Referring to your e-mail dated 29th March 2012 on UniFi availability and upon checking system,  we regret to inform that  your address as per previous e-mail is currently not under UniFi coverage area at this moment. However, we are adding FDCs (Fibre Drop Cabinets) as fast as we can. We are deploying new areas all the time. Some sections of a city may get service before others. It’s all dependent on how fast we can dig and lay cable in a given neighborhood, and get the required hardware in place. We are currently unable to give better estimation time.
sweat.gif
Maybe FDC may help to serve all towns and maybe areas within 5km radius
*
yah same here i also received email he also say FDC We are currently unable to give better estimation time. they wont tell when available my area cry.gif
krel89
post Mar 30 2012, 04:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
409 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(logit85 @ Mar 30 2012, 12:42 PM)
yah same here i also received email he also say FDC We are currently unable to give better estimation time. they wont tell when available my area  cry.gif
*
yela.. mana boleh janji sebarangan.. nnt kata "janji melayu" opsss..
hahahahaha
mazaziman
post Mar 30 2012, 05:47 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
385 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Lighthalzen


hi guys, just wanna ask a few question. if subscribe to astro byond pvr, the pvr came with built in hard disk or, i need to buy separated external hard disk for it? AFAIK, only WD AV 320GB works with astro byond pvr decoder.
smileguy
post Mar 30 2012, 06:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,147 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(mazaziman @ Mar 30 2012, 05:47 PM)
hi guys, just wanna ask a few question. if subscribe to astro byond pvr, the pvr came with built in hard disk or, i need to buy separated external hard disk for it? AFAIK, only WD AV 320GB works with astro byond pvr decoder.
*
take pvr built in dont go for external. cool2.gif
kaspersky-fan
post Mar 30 2012, 07:43 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,602 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
QUOTE(RAMChYLD @ Mar 30 2012, 10:05 AM)
Assteruk's greed made them make a lot of wrong decisions. Assteruk chose Ku Band instead of other more resilient bands, probably because receiver and transmitter system cheaper (or SKMM won't let them use other bands). There is also warning by ITU that Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia not suitable for Ku Band deployment. They ignore.

Agree with smileguy, assteruk sub probably make up only a small portion of their income. The rest comes from leasing out bandwidth on MEASAT to content providers by their sister company (and yet they complain not enough bandwidth...)
*
I do not think it works that way. The MEASAT satellite is owned by MEASAT. Even Astro requires to pay MEASAT for leasing bandwidth to broadcast to us. They may be sister companies, but they are totally separate entities. However, Astro is a big client of MEASAT and perhaps there may be slight discount?



125 Pages « < 55 56 57 58 59 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0302sec    0.50    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 12:20 PM