QUOTE(boyboy3663 @ Dec 5 2014, 12:04 PM)
4. In SnP Clause 26 (2) - The delivery of Vacant posession by the Vendor shall be supported by a certificate of completion and compliance certifying that the said building is safe and fit for occupation and includes the handling over the keys of the Parcel to the purchaser.
[I]For our case, yes VP is send together with CCC.[/I] The only uncertain here is handover of the key. Some say it's one week after we sign VP, anyone can confirm?
5. In SnP Clause 26 (3) - Upon the expiry of 14 days from the date of a notice from the Vendor requesting the Purchaser to take posession of the said Parcel, whether or not the Purchaser has actually entered into possession or occupation of the said Parcel, the Purchaser shall be deemed to have taken delivery of vacant possesion.
The date of taken vacant possesion is confirmed at 27 Nov 2014. It's unfair for us as the LAD will stop at 27 Nov despite we only receive the letter on 27/28 Nov.
I think the developer is following what is actually need to follow in the SnP and it's hard for us to fight for. The only doubt is why the CCC is issued even thought the building is not fully completed? Can we complain to Majlis Perbandaran Selayang about this?
JazzSerena's 'pot of gold' foto is the best weapon against the developers assertion that the Amara is 'fit for occupation'. And the architect was less than honest.[I]For our case, yes VP is send together with CCC.[/I] The only uncertain here is handover of the key. Some say it's one week after we sign VP, anyone can confirm?
5. In SnP Clause 26 (3) - Upon the expiry of 14 days from the date of a notice from the Vendor requesting the Purchaser to take posession of the said Parcel, whether or not the Purchaser has actually entered into possession or occupation of the said Parcel, the Purchaser shall be deemed to have taken delivery of vacant possesion.
The date of taken vacant possesion is confirmed at 27 Nov 2014. It's unfair for us as the LAD will stop at 27 Nov despite we only receive the letter on 27/28 Nov.
I think the developer is following what is actually need to follow in the SnP and it's hard for us to fight for. The only doubt is why the CCC is issued even thought the building is not fully completed? Can we complain to Majlis Perbandaran Selayang about this?
Architect's ccc dated 11/11/14
Jazzserena's posting dated 29/11/14
It will be good evidence if ever residents decide to challenge the developer, or for tribunal purposes. I am sure the architect does not want to face majlis or PAM over this.
Dec 5 2014, 10:53 PM

Quote
0.0239sec
0.28
6 queries
GZIP Disabled