Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

129 Pages « < 66 67 68 69 70 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 New Toyota Camry 2012, is Really coming now!

views
     
dares
post Jul 18 2012, 12:55 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(kenlye @ Jul 18 2012, 12:52 PM)
may i know is EBD work like VSC?
*
No, but VSC needs EBD to work.
BuFung
post Jul 18 2012, 12:55 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


QUOTE(kenlye @ Jul 18 2012, 12:52 PM)
may i know is EBD work like VSC?
*
think the diff between the 2 is.. EBD only distribute force differently between front wheels and rear wheels..

but VSC can do different force in any of the wheels... VSC help u steer the car when emergency...

EBD purely helping on reducing the stopping distance...
dares
post Jul 18 2012, 12:57 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(BuFung @ Jul 18 2012, 12:55 PM)
think the diff between the 2 is..  EBD only distribute force differently between front wheels and rear wheels..

but VSC can do different force in any of the wheels...  VSC help u steer the car when emergency... 

EBD purely helping on reducing the stopping distance...
*
Not necessarily just front and back, EBD can work on individual wheels as well.

VSC/ESC/ESP incorporates software and sensors and utilizes EBD to achieve stability during emergencies.
zweimmk
post Jul 18 2012, 12:58 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kukulong10 @ Jul 18 2012, 12:08 PM)
i know it is important but for those who cant afford the car with VSC so their life is not important? that is what Optiplex330 means.
*
I don't think he means it that way. If you really can't afford a car with VSC then so be it la. But it is a feature that should be made standard in this day and age regardless of the type of car a buyer is getting.

So I would rather have the feature than not, that's all.

When the latest generation Camry removed both traction control and vehicle stability control, I found it shocking as they are essentially asking consumers to pay MORE money for less features with the asking price. Even worse when you compare the Camry to all its competitors, the car comes across as a blatant ripoff and utter disrespect to its potential buyers. Long story short, their loss is their competitors gain, I ended up buying a competitor product instead.

If they keep this rubbish up, people will eventually realize the fact that they're been taken for a ride and boycott their products. It might not happen now but 10 to 15 years down the road, a lot can happen.
kenlye
post Jul 18 2012, 12:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



Added on July 18, 2012, 1:00 pm
QUOTE(dares @ Jul 18 2012, 12:57 PM)
Not necessarily just front and back, EBD can work on individual wheels as well.

VSC/ESC/ESP incorporates software and sensors and utilizes EBD to achieve stability during emergencies.
*
what u so sure about what u said ? any facts? or just your 2 cents?

This post has been edited by kenlye: Jul 18 2012, 01:00 PM
kepalapening
post Jul 18 2012, 01:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
No doubt VSC is important. Thanks to you guys.

The new Camry 2.5V did came with newer engine, dual VVTi + ACIS, EBD, TRC, etc.

Yes, traction control is not removed. Please check their website. Only VSC is absent.

How does the lacked of one feature makes the new Camry a crap as compared to Kia K5, as some of you guys here said?

Don't forget that the aero-corner design that reduces drag. Remember, KL to Perlis for only RM 60 (I don't care about L/km or km/L). Even some of the people here have doubt on the figure. But, this is the truth.

This post has been edited by kepalapening: Jul 18 2012, 01:07 PM
dares
post Jul 18 2012, 01:06 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(kenlye @ Jul 18 2012, 12:59 PM)

Added on July 18, 2012, 1:00 pm
what u so sure about what u said ? any facts? or just your 2 cents?
*
I got my 2 cents from Wikipedia rolleyes.gif

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_br...ce_distribution

choice quote from the article....
QUOTE
....ABS helps prevent wheel lock-up and EBD helps apply appropriate brake force to make ESC work effectively....


This post has been edited by dares: Jul 18 2012, 01:06 PM
kepalapening
post Jul 18 2012, 01:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(dares @ Jul 18 2012, 01:06 PM)
I got my 2 cents from Wikipedia  rolleyes.gif
You should cite a more reputable articles (books/journals/research papers).
Anybody can write anything in Wikipedia.

dares
post Jul 18 2012, 01:15 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(kepalapening @ Jul 18 2012, 01:10 PM)
You should cite a more reputable articles (books/journals/research papers).
Anybody can write anything in Wikipedia.
*
Will howstuffworks.com work then?

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/car-driving-...stribution2.htm

QUOTE
EBD can then correct the steering by activating one of the rear brakes. For instance, if the car begins to understeer, the inner rear brake is activated to increase the car's rotation. If the car begins to oversteer, the outer rear brake is activated to decrease the car's rotation. The yaw sensor can also be used in conjunction with electronic stability control (ESC) to prevent rollover accidents.


WTF am I trying to prove? doh.gif are people so skeptical as to believe EBD and ESC/VSC is the same thing?
michspc
post Jul 18 2012, 01:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
31 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(zweimmk @ Jul 18 2012, 12:58 PM)
I don't think he means it that way. If you really can't afford a car with VSC then so be it la. But it is a feature that should be made standard in this day and age regardless of the type of car a buyer is getting.

So I would rather have the feature than not, that's all.

When the latest generation Camry removed both traction control and vehicle stability control, I found it shocking as they are essentially asking consumers to pay MORE money for less features with the asking price. Even worse when you compare the Camry to all its competitors, the car comes across as a blatant ripoff and utter disrespect to its potential buyers. Long story short, their loss is their competitors gain, I ended up buying a competitor product instead.

If they keep this rubbish up, people will eventually realize the fact that they're been taken for a ride and boycott their products. It might not happen now but 10 to 15 years down the road, a lot can happen.
*
are u sure about the toyota remove TRC also in the latest generation of camry? I thought VSC is absence only...and Do u think the consumers pay more money for less features? Why dont u think they using new 2.5 Dual VVti engine with ACIS and more airbags than before....So i think they raises a few thousand for upgrading from 2.4 to 2.5v from vvti to dual vvti and fom 5 speed to 6 speed n and from 2 airbags to 4 airbags sound reasonable. ....

Dont tell me that dual vvti is a not a new tech or whatsoever...at least it still a improved feature for which the previous generation model not using it....

This post has been edited by michspc: Jul 18 2012, 01:35 PM
zweimmk
post Jul 18 2012, 01:30 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kepalapening @ Jul 18 2012, 01:04 PM)
No doubt VSC is important. Thanks to you guys.

The new Camry 2.5V did came with newer engine, dual VVTi + ACIS, EBD, TRC, etc.

Yes, traction control is not removed. Please check their website. Only VSC is absent.

How does the lacked of one feature makes the new Camry a crap as compared to Kia K5, as some of you guys here said?

Don't forget that the aero-corner design that reduces drag. Remember, KL to Perlis for only RM 60 (I don't care about L/km or km/L). Even some of the people here have doubt on the figure. But, this is the truth.
*
No, no Traction control. It's not listed on their spec list. You go check yourself under column safety.

The aero-corner design reduces drag coefficient, which improves mileage. It doesn't do anything to improve safety btw, same story with the engine - 100% all the technology given is to improve your mileage so in this respect, the 2.5V engine is definitely better than 2.4V.

This post has been edited by zweimmk: Jul 18 2012, 01:30 PM
kenlye
post Jul 18 2012, 01:33 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(dares @ Jul 18 2012, 01:15 PM)
Will howstuffworks.com work then?

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/car-driving-...stribution2.htm
WTF am I trying to prove?  doh.gif are people so skeptical as to believe EBD and ESC/VSC is the same thing?
*
Quote from howstuff works < EBD can then correct the steering by activating one of the rear brakes. For instance, if the car begins to understeer, the inner rear brake is activated to increase the car's rotation. If the car begins to oversteer, the outer rear brake is activated to decrease the car's rotation. The yaw sensor can also be used in conjunction with electronic stability control (ESC) to prevent rollover accidents. >
kepalapening
post Jul 18 2012, 01:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(zweimmk @ Jul 18 2012, 01:30 PM)
No, no Traction control. It's not listed on their spec list. You go check yourself under column safety.

The aero-corner design reduces drag coefficient, which improves mileage. It doesn't do anything to improve safety btw, same story with the engine - 100% all the technology given is to improve your mileage so in this respect, the 2.5V engine is definitely better than 2.4V.
*
The website did mentioned traction control.
michspc
post Jul 18 2012, 01:37 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
31 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
yes i saw that too


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
kukulong10
post Jul 18 2012, 01:40 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Jul 18 2012, 12:40 PM)
Bro, i think you had better stop commenting as its clear that you dont understand what VSC is and what we're trying to tell you here. So we'll agree to disagree. If you think VSC is not important for you or your family then so be it. But as for us here, we are very clear on the importance of VSC and thus we will continue to vouch for it.

But here are some articles that you may or may not find useful:

http://paultan.org/2012/06/27/esp-stabilit...-in-their-cars/

http://paultan.org/2007/04/16/all-us-cars-...ontrol-by-2011/

http://crave.cnet.co.uk/cartech/electronic...-cars-50006253/

http://www.themotorreport.com.au/35060/fed...atory-from-2011

http://www.wabco-auto.com/nc/media-center-...BpL%5D=31535999

If this doesnt change your mind, then nothing else will except maybe a real life accident.
*
conclusion..you are trying to prove that k5 is well better then camry..since k5 has all the features?
zweimmk
post Jul 18 2012, 01:43 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kepalapening @ Jul 18 2012, 01:34 PM)
The website did mentioned traction control.
*
The website listed TRC under safety features, but their spec list DID NOT put it in.

So it's contradiction actually. But you can always check your owners manual, if it is listed in then you have it loh, otherwise, I'm going to take it as without since the specification did not list it in at all.
kukulong10
post Jul 18 2012, 01:44 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(kepalapening @ Jul 18 2012, 01:04 PM)
No doubt VSC is important. Thanks to you guys.

The new Camry 2.5V did came with newer engine, dual VVTi + ACIS, EBD, TRC, etc.

Yes, traction control is not removed. Please check their website. Only VSC is absent.

How does the lacked of one feature makes the new Camry a crap as compared to Kia K5, as some of you guys here said?

Don't forget that the aero-corner design that reduces drag. Remember, KL to Perlis for only RM 60 (I don't care about L/km or km/L). Even some of the people here have doubt on the figure. But, this is the truth.
*
i agree with what you said.. they are trying to prove kia k5 is more worth of their money.
zweimmk
post Jul 18 2012, 01:45 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kukulong10 @ Jul 18 2012, 01:44 PM)
i agree with what you said.. they are trying to prove kia k5 is more worth of their money.
*
I don't drive a K5 btw, LOL. so don't drag me in it.
kukulong10
post Jul 18 2012, 01:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(zweimmk @ Jul 18 2012, 01:45 PM)
I don't drive a K5 btw, LOL. so don't drag me in it.
*
i did not mention you..jus other people who post in this forum before..
who do not wan VSC if it come with it..but if the new camry doesnt come with it, i can say that camry is still one of the safest the car on the road
zweimmk
post Jul 18 2012, 01:57 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kukulong10 @ Jul 18 2012, 01:48 PM)
i did not mention you..jus other people who post in this forum before..
who do not wan VSC if it come with it..but if the new camry doesnt come with it, i can say that camry is still one of the safest the car on the road
*
Value is very subjective and measured differently by each different individual

In this respect, if you stack the Camry against all its competitors, it will look very very bad because it's as bare as bare can be. It's kind of like brand A phone vs all other brands.

If you consider the Camry based on its size, comfort, NVH, after sales and resale value etc, then it will look much more promising.

At the end of the day, I think it just boils down to how much you like the car to buy it, LOL!

129 Pages « < 66 67 68 69 70 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0369sec    0.65    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 11:23 PM