Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Official Microsoft Windows Vista Discussion Thread, Strictly NO warez discussion
|
dualshock
|
Dec 6 2006, 04:17 PM
|
|
QUOTE(linkinstreet @ Dec 6 2006, 10:44 AM) oh yeah, I forgot. I just use dos command anyways for this tho  want this as your bootscreen?  download the file below and follow the instruction Mirror 1Mirror 2can the loading bar move?? if can that would be superb...thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
linkinstreet
|
Dec 6 2006, 05:12 PM
|
Red Bull Addict
|
sadly no, I think the maker is working on a version with a moving bar tho
|
|
|
|
|
|
rayfoo
|
Dec 6 2006, 06:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netto Hikari
|
Dec 6 2006, 10:03 PM
|
|
guys, is vista worth to get? any pros n cons of it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
linkinstreet
|
Dec 6 2006, 11:47 PM
|
Red Bull Addict
|
Read through the thread. It's definately worth every penny you pay for the pirated disc
|
|
|
|
|
|
linkinstreet
|
Dec 6 2006, 11:54 PM
|
Red Bull Addict
|
fancy a new kind of wallpaper? QUOTE As disclosed and confirmed by multiple sources: One of the new UI features being added to Windows Vista during the blackout time leading to RTM is currently known internally as "Motion Desktop" and could very easily retain this title as its final name. It will allow for the end user to run an animated or interactive desktop wallpaper to complement the UI already present in Windows Vista. The Vista SKUs which will contain this new feature along with the degree of customizability the end user will see in creating his own Motion Desktop are as yet unknown. More details as I have them. Internal discussions seem to suggest that interactive Motion Desktops should be able to integrate with relative ease into various Windows Live services, and one can expect third-party and first-party Motion Desktops to be displayed on a Live gallery similar to what is currently in use for sidebar and live gadgets. Update (10-24-06): As confirmed by Paul Thurrott, Motion Desktop will be an Ultimate Extras feature only, and it will be rolled out in January 2007, and will not be much different from running a screensaver as a wallpaper (similar to Long's screensaver application) as internally confirmed by Michael. Source: In-House
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netto Hikari
|
Dec 7 2006, 02:13 AM
|
|
QUOTE(linkinstreet @ Dec 6 2006, 11:47 PM) Read through the thread. It's definately worth every penny you pay for the pirated discmeh....55 pages just to want to confirm something. can all winxp software run in vista? mainly is games ,antivirus,bt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
rayfoo
|
Dec 7 2006, 08:30 AM
|
|
anyone manage to install adobe reader v8.0 for vista succesfully? getting some MSI Installer error
This post has been edited by rayfoo: Dec 7 2006, 08:30 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
linkinstreet
|
Dec 7 2006, 08:47 AM
|
Red Bull Addict
|
I use alternative software as Adobe reader was a bit too resorce hunry for me. @netto hikari majority of the software can still be used
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redhu
|
Dec 7 2006, 01:29 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Vista Software Compatibility List http://iexbeta.com/wiki/index.php/Windows_...patibility_ListBTW, I've no problem using Adobe Reader 7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
binary
|
Dec 7 2006, 04:21 PM
|
|
installed vista ulimate last night. first impression, the GUI is awesome but some of my apps and software didn't run porperly in vista. Finally, switched back to XP. I'll wait until mid of next year to install Vista when they solved all the compatibility issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vinci777
|
Dec 7 2006, 09:25 PM
|
|
er...a small question here... Windows Vista Beta 2... wat version wat this? izzit same as RC2 or its the final release b4 we retail?
|
|
|
|
|
|
dualshock
|
Dec 7 2006, 10:08 PM
|
|
the sequence of release is like this
beta 1>beta 2>RC1>RC2>RTM(final)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vinci777
|
Dec 7 2006, 11:52 PM
|
|
QUOTE(dualshock @ Dec 7 2006, 10:08 PM) the sequence of release is like this beta 1>beta 2>RC1>RC2>RTM(final) Thanks ^^ Guess my company cd is outdated...heh.. Btw to all Vista Users, do u guys experience this problem b4 where ur CPU Clock seen in Cpu-z are not stable? coz my fren installed RC1 and beta 2. Both have same problem where his cpu clock runs from 1000mhz to 2200mhz (stock) randomly...
|
|
|
|
|
|
mengsuan
|
Dec 8 2006, 12:21 AM
|
9W2NNS
|
QUOTE(Vinci777 @ Dec 7 2006, 11:52 PM) Thanks ^^ Guess my company cd is outdated...heh.. Btw to all Vista Users, do u guys experience this problem b4 where ur CPU Clock seen in Cpu-z are not stable? coz my fren installed RC1 and beta 2. Both have same problem where his cpu clock runs from 1000mhz to 2200mhz (stock) randomly... AMD cool and quiet or Intel Speedstep activated?
|
|
|
|
|
|
linkinstreet
|
Dec 8 2006, 10:59 AM
|
Red Bull Addict
|
No such problem for me... Meh.. I want WinFS!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZiYi
|
Dec 8 2006, 11:07 AM
|
|
QUOTE(rayfoo @ Dec 7 2006, 08:30 AM) anyone manage to install adobe reader v8.0 for vista succesfully? getting some MSI Installer error Try run the installer as administrater. BTW I'm using 7.0.8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dualshock
|
Dec 8 2006, 11:43 AM
|
|
QUOTE(rayfoo @ Dec 7 2006, 08:30 AM) anyone manage to install adobe reader v8.0 for vista succesfully? getting some MSI Installer error i downloaded the installation file last night and installed it without any hitch...not even needing to install with compatibility mode or run as administrator... try to re-download the installer...it's not that big anyway...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vinci777
|
Dec 8 2006, 12:10 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mengsuan @ Dec 8 2006, 12:21 AM) AMD cool and quiet or Intel Speedstep activated? hmm..its at default setting.. should be activate rite? however running in XP hav no problems... CPU-z problem or vista? unsure bout it
|
|
|
|
|
|
binary
|
Dec 8 2006, 02:37 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Vinci777 @ Dec 8 2006, 12:10 PM) hmm..its at default setting.. should be activate rite? however running in XP hav no problems... CPU-z problem or vista? unsure bout it I'm having the same problem too when running CPU-z in Vista. The CPU reading keep changing from 1000Mhz to 2.2Ghz (using 3500+). I dont hv this problem when using winxp. I guess cpu-z is not ready yet for vista. Just wait n see.
|
|
|
|
|