QUOTE(property101 @ Apr 22 2011, 10:54 PM)
a question for fellow property investors:
assuming there is a slight drop and property stagnant for a while in the near future, and you started bleeding cash to feed the installment. although you do have the holding power, i'm sure u do not want to indefinitely bleeding cash, how long the period is acceptable for an investor to keep holding on before cut lost?
always prepare cash reserve to withstand 2 yrs of installment IMHO... you can get it rented out to minimize cash bleeding..
IMHO, minor cash bleeding is still tolerable as long as you are confident the prop you are holding will give good returns in the long run..
I was suffering -ve cash flow when I bought my 1st prop 5 years ago bcos the place was untested, and interest rate was high.. not long after 1 year, when the valuation was pretty clear for that place, the rental was increase and thats where I started to gain some +cash flow, and 5 year down the road, the price had appreciated close to 100%..
Most ppl looking at immediate ROI as the key for potential.. however, IMHO, if a prop has its true nature of potential, the potential will always be there regardless what the immediate ROI is. When the true potential previal, it can be bigger than you tought.. ROI and Potential should be viewed from different angle.. The key is how confident are you with your property and long you can hold.. however, smaller players might avoid this kind of investment who cant effort to suffer any cash bleed at any point of time..
Having said the above, I would like to stress that it is not a generalize term but rather a case by case basis.. If your prop incur more losses in the long run, better get rid of it before shit get shitter..
my 2 humble rupiah..
Added on April 23, 2011, 11:14 amQUOTE(wankongyew @ Apr 23 2011, 10:40 AM)
I believe that most of the people here are talking from the perspective of investors as opposed to buying a house for staying in yourself. Even though I'm one of the leading bears in this forum, I still believe that if you manage to find a property that you like, is conveniently located for you and is affordable to you, you should by all means buy it regardless of the state of the overall market. My only advice is that people buying to stay should consider sub-sale properties in addition to new launches. I don't understand why so many people buying to stay only insist on new launches. New or old, you're likely to spend a fair bit to renovate the unit to your personal liking anyway.
Different ppl has different preference and IMHO, should not be generalized everyone should act the same...
-sometime subsale might incur more $$ for fixing old pipes and renovation.. some renovated house might not suit your taste anyway..
-the current attractive thing about new launch is the minimal upfront fee.. its not the installment that they cant afford, but rather the initial capital that they do not have.. Its easier to afford installment than initial capital nowadays.. Notice not many malaysian have enough cash and saving by looking at the ever increasing household debts and lifestyle..
-new launches nowadays mostly offer securtity concept as opposed those most of the subsale unit which do not hav G&G..
This post has been edited by eugene jk: Apr 23 2011, 11:14 AM