Yeah, same here. I just learned something new today.

Thanks for the input CY

@KTCY , KTCY would you mind to let me know how much u bought your 24mm?

@Bliz , 16-35mm failed to resist flaring? Correct me if im wrong. Bliz where you get your 16-35mm?

KTCY sure will say "it's for me to know, for you to find out"
haha..anyways, his price always cheaper than market price..

Flaring I don't have chance to test it yet, got my 16-35 at Melaka

Sorry , if i made any mistakes please correct me ya.

I dont know is is okay to ask the price?

Alright , if got chance to test it out , keep me update. Thank ! Alright got it ! thank for telling me

Dealer price at 6.5k
I get slightly cheaper

u make no mistake..is okay to ask for price..but bro KTCY always got special discount which we hardly found in market..lol

no mistakes. just add 's' on ur thank to make it 'thanks'

D7000
F2.8
1/800
ISO100

C&C Appreciated

thanks you !

Nope, shooting at f/1.4 or f/2 or f/8 doesn't exactly affect your exposure. Just need to set up well it will be ok. f/1.4 tend to have more vignetting compared to f/2 or f/4.

KTCY, like I said it is the aperture diameter. I'm not talking about filter thread.

50 f/1.2 is just 41.67 aperture opening. You can have bigger barrel than the aperture opening, but not smaller ;-)

Correct, aperture diameter . I didn't mention about the filter thread or barrel size.

Take the Sigma for example, 50mm f/1.4 using 72mm and the 50mm f/1.4D using 52mm (I think). But the aperture opening is still the same, only differences is the barrel size.

Take 85 f/1.2L (72mm) versus 85mm f/1.4G (77mm), why smaller aperture can have bigger filter size? It doesn't matter, cause 85/1.2 = 70.83mm. You still have space.

About time you learn?

Correct, that is why I said it is something simple

Welcome.

Welcome.

Welcome.

85mm...
its so poisoning...

U've been sharing her photos quite a bit more than other gals...
Not that its a bad thing thou.

Celciuz, says like, the background is very bright, and your subject place there isnt that bright, and you metered your subject with correct exposure,
how about the bright background ? wouldn't it be brighter ?
then how you overcome to that situation ?
I no skill man

I think he's good at choosing spot, or mayb using reflector That's y his subject is alwiz balanced lit comparing with the background

cant help but to comment

apart from location, there's always a choice to use a flash as fill to brighten up the subject and bring it to be the same as the background.

Heheh reflector.
you see his picture the model skin looks smooth smooth and white white wan.
you just reminded me of reflector.
never use it thou... me not that Pro

But has to know how to set properly if not the flash effect
too strong make the background imbalance

its not as hard as you thought it to be actually. Expose for the background 1st without the flash, only to introduce the flash later in manual and adjust to desired intensity..

My noob shot with fillflash


KEN_3798 by Kent3888, on Flickr

---

Added on March 4, 2011, 1:02 pmPixel peep, which 1 is sharper?

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews...omp=0&APIComp=0

This post has been edited by Kent3888: Mar 4 2011, 01:02 PM