Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V5, Anticipating D700 replacement !
|
Bliz
|
Feb 17 2011, 01:32 PM
|
|
QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Feb 17 2011, 12:25 PM) vr 70-300mm = cant be AF since this lens doesn't have motor. this lens are AF vr 55-300mm = new lens, improve local length and VR version, now are VRIIvr 55-200mm = old lens, if have choice, take 55-300  so, take 55300 p/s: correct me if worng  I believe he's taking about 70-300vrII, if that's the case, skip the other 2 lens and get this instead, very good lens for the price u paid. I believe the price is around RM1800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 18 2011, 10:04 AM
|
|
QUOTE(iman_210 @ Feb 18 2011, 09:26 AM) Contemplating to forego my nikkor 18-35 to get a 17-35 f 2.8..Is it worth the purchase? If i were u i would skip the 17-35 F/2.8 and get the 16-35 F/4VR instead, will be collecting mine this saturday
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 18 2011, 01:41 PM
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 18 2011, 01:18 PM) All? Lulz when I see this statement. Drop the idea of getting that 18-270. If you need tele lens, get 70300. Only people that do not have 70-200 crave for it, for those who already have it we just worship it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 18 2011, 01:48 PM
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 18 2011, 01:43 PM) Once you've used good IQ lens you can never turn back... LOL. N coat lens for me all the way, damn my 16-35 tomorrow only can collect .. Been waiting for almost 1 week
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 18 2011, 02:01 PM
|
|
QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Feb 18 2011, 02:00 PM) my vote goes to 70-300 VR ... almost wanted to get it last time but went for Tokina 11-16 instead ... no regrets getting the Tokina ...  Wah from telephoto to WA  ... btw the tokina is a bit soft compared to the nikkor 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 18 2011, 02:25 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Feb 18 2011, 02:15 PM) holy ....  Lol my pants are getting wet just by seeing those images  , but u can get even better by getting the latest 200mm F/2 VRII
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 18 2011, 02:34 PM
|
|
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Feb 18 2011, 02:32 PM) Bokeh wise I guess still 300mm f2.0 rawks  I wonder how heavy is that thing, must practice more muscles before getting those lens  ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 18 2011, 02:39 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Feb 18 2011, 02:36 PM) after that you can carry a bazooka without problem  No problem carrying bazooka but have problem owning it ( too expensive  )
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 18 2011, 02:43 PM
|
|
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Feb 18 2011, 02:40 PM) The person still can handheld it at 1/160s  , very strong arms
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 18 2011, 11:10 PM
|
|
QUOTE(General_Nic @ Feb 18 2011, 09:26 PM) So nice... I nid to wait till 2013 for 24mm... Btw, reli poisoned 99 by Sigma 50mm on FX d other day >_< Tempting to get FX body with only 50mm instead of getting 24mm 3 nites cant sleep well d  Most of the 1.4 lens will absolutely shine on the FX body  , auto upgrade for all your existing lenses by changing to FX body
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 19 2011, 03:56 PM
|
|
Finally received my 16-35 F/4 VR Nikkor 16-35 F/4 VR by Bliz®, on Flickr This post has been edited by Bliz: Feb 19 2011, 04:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 19 2011, 04:41 PM
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 19 2011, 04:38 PM) Great, now start funding for 85G  . You know you want it. Damn must resist the poison
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 19 2011, 04:56 PM
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 19 2011, 04:42 PM) You think you can?  . Just wait and see haha~ so far your lens selection very similar to mine  I think it will be the same soon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 19 2011, 05:06 PM
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 19 2011, 05:01 PM) Let me continue poisoning you sure soon grab the 85G de  . Heng's place got stock? Hahaha! No stock there luckily, btw heng not around wanted to ask the lenshood for u..They only have 1.4D there
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 19 2011, 09:47 PM
|
|
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 19 2011, 09:36 PM) Happy for you bro. Cosmos they sold me 2nd handed handphone with 1st hand price. they even tell me it's a brand new phone.  How I know it's a second handed? There is a picture of some1 apartment in my Phone memory. I was like.  FTW You sux Just did my 1st pre wed photo shoot. damn tiring la weii.. never know it is that tiring. but I am happy.  Hehe spam some food pics using 16-35 first, the close focusing distance is a plus  .... prewed is oklar, actual wedding day is way more tiring DSC_7230 by Bliz®, on Flickr DSC_7237 by Bliz®, on Flickr DSC_7239 by Bliz®, on Flickr
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 19 2011, 09:55 PM
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 19 2011, 09:52 PM) But but but... the Canon users thinks 550D -> D90, 60D -> D7000, 50D,7D -> D300s  7D is better than d300s i agree on that, but not the rest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 19 2011, 09:58 PM
|
|
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 19 2011, 09:55 PM) we are here to gain knowledge in photography dude. not to hear your sarcasm joke, and poisoning other with gears especially those who don't have any knowledge in photography. when you firstly ask an advice from your friend regarding what camera should you buy. and they tell your about D3x. what do you think? earn money by selling corpse? I do understand that is a joke. but that poisoning joke is not suitable for answering a newbie question bro. just my 2 cents. ignore it if you do mind. Excited.  bro mind me asking. have you ever do studio photo shoot? Never do any studio photoshoots b4 cos i thnk it's boring with controlled lighting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 19 2011, 10:10 PM
|
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 19 2011, 10:03 PM) But I always don't understand Canon's strategy. They always have competition even within their own products  . 550D -> 60D -> 7D. All using same sensor... Fuh, action la~  Lol just my opinion only la, cos i still noob and want to learn how to adopt to different lightning
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 19 2011, 10:26 PM
|
|
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 19 2011, 10:25 PM) I like their calculators, much better than casio and never failed me in exam. After so many years still running strong. I like their L lens. At least they dare to say officially that their lens are weather sealed unlike nikon so that crazy and rich people can bring it when they bath and shower with their rubber ducky.  No doubt the built quality of the L lens is amazing, not saying that Nikon is bad  .. Well u cant go wrong with Nikon nor Canon la, both are good cameras anyway... anyway we are here to discuss Nikon not to bash Canon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bliz
|
Feb 19 2011, 10:34 PM
|
|
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 19 2011, 10:27 PM)  The failure of their product differentiation is only a recent phenomena. So we'll see the coming near futures. The competition now between the big 2 is getting ever so intense because of what Canon did to their entry-level dslr. Nikon offers more value for money now. More competition=more price cuts which is good for consumer like us, but that only happened on DSLR body not on lenses
|
|
|
|
|