Yea, I'm talking about the CPL; You can try it and see the difference; But I think the kit-lens have rotating front elements which makes using CPL difficult.

Anyway, for the last 2 picture, which you have both overexpose and underexpose, HDR will give you the best result from both.

How to do vignetting shooting without using DX lens on FX body? any idea?

PP

i know one guys normally not editing any sports shot and yes manual lens

---

Added on January 21, 2011, 2:07 amsepam sepam tgk ape cite


This post has been edited by Isepunye: Jan 21 2011, 02:07 AM

I found something for those who said sigma 50mm is better than nikon 50mm @f/1.4
http://www.bythom.com/Sigma-50-HSM-lensreview.htm

---

Added on January 21, 2011, 4:46 amno other way else than PP?
I am sucks at PP.

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 21 2011, 04:46 AM

very easy maaa.. if using photoshop, under Filter>Distort>Lens Correction...

adjust the vignetting value u want

Question, nikon d7000 vs nikon d90. Which is recommended for a beginner. I know that nikon d7000 takes better photos or has better features, however as a beginner is that a good camera to start off with? Moreover Nikon d90 is roughly Rm1000 cheaper

D7000. No regret with that 1k more to spend !

grab D7000...although im using D90...coz got more feature..but i love my D90

I think I need to play around with photoshop again. Thanks anyway

The question is D3100 or D7000.
if you are expecting entry level body go for D3100 instead. Else? D7000 definitely.

next time.. try asking uncle google... he knows a lot u know..

D90 and D3100, I would probably go for D90 to be frank . Cannot tahan D3100's build, and no twin dials like D90, no CLS too! Wah a few things don't have cannot tahan la~

Will you buy a brand new D90. Compared to brand new D3100?
as it's been 2 years+ in the market.

I'd get D7000 over D90 or D3100
Well if budget really problems, D90 anytime. No AF motor = more $$$ spend on lens and etc.

Why not? I bought a 2years ++ old D700 brand new 2months ago, if it's a good camera, it will always be one

Fuyooh.. Pioson O' Latte in the early morning. Now I have no more Idea how to generate money. expect working hard like a donkey for camera and lens.

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 21 2011, 10:42 AM

+1 ....if you know that its good,and it will serve the purpose that u wanted..MAYBE to some,newer technology hence a better looking output,but all and all its pours down to the skills of the person oso..crap skill,having a d3s also will produce just a so-so picture only lah..

This post has been edited by zackskate666: Jan 21 2011, 10:42 AM

I'm actually one of those who bought the 2yr+ old camera recently... haha. So far satisfied with it, complains (maybe because there's no newer FX body other than the D3s lols).

so long didnt posted in this thread...before this celciuz using d90,now d700 already...maybe after this we can see d3s maybe?...
all people upgrading..im the only one downgrade..from 2 body to one...

I from one to none