Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V3, Dark Lord going strong
|
|
 Dec 30 2010, 08:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka  
|
QUOTE(fisherman10 @ Dec 30 2010, 01:53 AM) actually nowadays the NR in softwares are very good already. iso1600 shouldnt be much of a problem. NR is good, but u lost a lot of details by applying NR   . That's why I shot all my files in RAW with NR OFF  This post has been edited by Bliz: Dec 30 2010, 08:38 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2010, 07:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Dec 30 2010, 07:08 PM) No way! Hahaha! The most let you take 1 shot nia Lol, that's what I told you before(or was it other people?), u not gonna use D90 when u have D700, the D90 feels so suck after using D700  . Thinking to sell away my D90 already, initially wanted to keep D90 for 2 bodies. But now it seems like I rather change lens instead of fitting one at the D90 LOL.  |
|
|
Dec 30 2010, 07:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Dec 30 2010, 07:16 PM) Damn right, now I know why my friend dumped his D300 after getting D3. Rather change lens than to use D300 as sub body most of the time LOL. Get the D4 to complement your D700  |
|
|
Jan 1 2011, 11:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
My D700 shutter count is already 6k+ since I bought it 1 month ago, no worries la just snap n snap
|
|
|
Jan 2 2011, 11:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Jan 2 2011, 03:06 AM) None of the above, means, other N lens? U don't need to be a body builder to do that lar, i been carrying my D700+BG+70-200+SB900 frequently and i am skinny(definitely not body builder arm)  Played with my friend's D700 + BG + 70200. Awesomely awesome but very heavy  IIRC celciuz, you always carry that + SB900 right? Your hand must look like a bodybuilder    .. Once u are used to the weight then it will be fine, but it's still quite a lot of weight(My estimation is 4kg for all that gears)Added on January 2, 2011, 11:36 am QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Jan 2 2011, 10:03 AM) plan to get a 24-70 f2.8... 24mm is not wide for DX, later u complain not wide enough then sell again ani idea how low a used price can fetch...? very interested in getting dis lens... coz in d90... wide is stil ok for me... + some range oso... This post has been edited by Bliz: Jan 2 2011, 11:36 AM |
|
|
Jan 2 2011, 02:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Jan 2 2011, 02:17 PM) just back from wedding actual day shooting. Kitlens 18mm on APS-C also can die. House too cramped. I wished I got an FF body. What has FF body got to do with wedding? 18mm on crop sensor is wide enough for u to shoot I almost used my kitlens like a "18mm prime lens" Added on January 2, 2011, 2:18 pm I went for f/5.6-f/7.1 for group photos. Saves all my hassle.  Added on January 2, 2011, 2:19 pm Just now actual day wedding shoot for just 6 hours I have spammed almost 700+ shots, not counting shutter spam count tonight for dinner.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 2 2011, 07:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Jan 2 2011, 07:02 PM) i agree with you there bro ... tried the 85mm 1.4G on my D90 without a grip ... its totally off balance for me ... 85 1.4g is not meant for crop sensor, it's designed for FF sensor anyway, i find it balanced horribly on my previous D90 but on D700 it is perfect  |
|
|
Jan 2 2011, 07:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Jan 2 2011, 07:30 PM) the only reason we don't find it suit is because we still use DX model. No doubt on that, but there's always 50 1.4g for DX user cannot do anything. hahaha  |
|
|
Jan 3 2011, 03:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(jerrychoo2004 @ Jan 3 2011, 02:17 PM) no problem bro glad to be of help Do let us know once u get it, interested to buy one for portraiture as well, the 1.4G is too expensive for me by the way anyone has any comments on the sigma 85mm 1.4? i have ordered it to be paired with my D700 for portraiture  choose not to go for nikkor 85mm 1.4G coz the price is much higher |
|
|
Jan 3 2011, 05:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Jan 3 2011, 05:14 PM) ^ It's 2 years but it's ass kicking good( dun count in D3s/D3x, those the only Nikon camera it cannot beat ) CY why don't you wait for d800 instead? I mean seriously d700 it's been there for 2 years ++ isn't it? don't you scare lacking of technology or etc?? take that picture control for example. , i myself also bought one long not ago, after CY went to KLIMS he beh tahan and bought D700 himself |
|
|
Jan 3 2011, 05:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 3 2011, 05:24 PM) Siao lar you... ahaha not loaded ok. Anyways D700 is what I can afford la haha, as compared to D3. Got pop up flash! and cheaper! Not to mention just 1 fps slower~ U can tahan or not , i wait to see your D4 comes out |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 10:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 4 2011, 12:06 AM) Poison bliz first, 85mm before going to bed haha! I shall resist the temptation, the force is too great  |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 06:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
Time to spam
 DSC_5971 (Custom) (2) by Bliz®, on Flickr This post has been edited by Bliz: Jan 4 2011, 06:48 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 06:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 4 2011, 06:50 PM) Hi Bliz, just to tell you that you need a G lens! Lol, i dun need G lens  Sorry haha can't resist to stop poisoning you. |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 07:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 4 2011, 06:55 PM) Need la~ G lens is good~ hahaha!  See see~  i shall resist the temptation |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 07:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 4 2011, 07:13 PM) The lens actually gives bokeh on D90 too ya know 35mm F2? » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Then again, I'm hunting for a small tiny lens to use >(. At the moment, its my 50mm f/1.8D hahaha! It looks so cute on the D700. This post has been edited by Bliz: Jan 4 2011, 07:36 PM |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 08:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(razuryza @ Jan 4 2011, 07:36 PM) he doesnt has that la bro.. for sure he said about the 85mm g! I am asking him to get 35mm F2 since he wants a small lens, i know what lens he has Added on January 4, 2011, 7:39 pmsince u had mention 35mm f/2D.. here is on the DX (D80) at widest  |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 08:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Jan 4 2011, 08:19 PM) way too expensive for me.. still do saving for sigma 50mm 1.4 That's not bokeh to me wait la bro. later I will do that kind of bokeh as well. wait till I am pro.. who said? I am working while studying. and I am highly poisoned feel like steal money from bank. bro CY, 35.. 1.8G + D3100 oso can bokeh one lorrr  , time to show u some real bokeh   DSC_1896 by Bliz®, on Flickr Added on January 4, 2011, 8:26 pm QUOTE(razuryza @ Jan 4 2011, 07:53 PM) i get quoted once for rm4650.. if anybody can get lower tell me.. haha Rm4600 here This post has been edited by Bliz: Jan 4 2011, 08:26 PM |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 08:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Jan 4 2011, 08:29 PM) Hey Blitz, how's the 50mm 1.4D compared to the Sigma 50mm?? lol..... nearly twice the price, worth?? Other ppl who knows about this feel free to insert ya.. 1.4D lousy bokeh, soft at 1.4... If want get the best, don't get halfway later ended up selling it for the best .. IMHO, Sigma 50mm is the best for Nikon..simply love it |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 08:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Jan 4 2011, 08:40 PM) Dammn...... I thought u will say..... Arghh Sigma is juz slightly better than the 1.4D only Get sigma la, the best 50mm for nikon, no regret for sure.. I won't sell if if I am still using DX cam  So got excuse for me to not spend the extra mile  I'm so poisoned with the 50mm length for portrait  |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0436sec
 0.26
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 11:56 AM |
Quote
