QUOTE(Patent @ Aug 11 2011, 02:04 AM)
Very fun You shud try it too
Show off your Desktop !, [IMAGE HEAVY !]
|
|
Aug 11 2011, 06:46 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,789 posts Joined: Jul 2010 From: Silicon Valley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 11 2011, 03:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
563 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Everything happens for a reason |
|
|
|
Aug 11 2011, 05:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,748 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
QUOTE(Patent @ Aug 11 2011, 02:04 AM) Is it fun to use tiling WMs ? I wouldn't say fun, just more comfy for me. Tiling WM's were mostly designed around the needs of CLI users, mainly people who do a lot of editing in Vi or Emacs, giving them the ability to automatically tile projects side-by-side and make diff comparisons and whatnot. You'll see a lot of posers all over the web who show off a tiling wm, but actually use regular Nautilus or Thunar for their file management and Gedit or Mousepad for their editing. What's the point? Use a tiler only if you feel your apps and workflow will benefit from it. One benefit (regardless of whether you're a CLI or GUI guy) is that you'll never feel the need to minimize to a panel or tray ever again. It's an acquired taste, though. A tiling wm must feel like a second skin to you, or it'll just be a pain in the long run. Some of my most efficient setups are extremely low contrast and bland, like this one; ![]() P.S: Could you guys please start using thumbnails. This post has been edited by G-17: Aug 11 2011, 05:20 PM |
|
|
Aug 11 2011, 05:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
997 posts Joined: Feb 2007 |
QUOTE(G-17 @ Aug 11 2011, 05:17 PM) I wouldn't say fun, just more comfy for me. Tiling WM's were mostly designed around the needs of CLI users, mainly people who do a lot of editing in Vi or Emacs, giving them the ability to automatically tile projects side-by-side and make diff comparisons and whatnot. You'll see a lot of posers all over the web who show off a tiling wm, but actually use regular Nautilus or Thunar for their file management and Gedit or Mousepad for their editing. What's the point? Actually, I use ALOT of command line but still use gedit for editing. I like the background colour when editing. Its easy on the eyes.Use a tiler only if you feel your apps and workflow will benefit from it. One benefit (regardless of whether you're a CLI or GUI guy) is that you'll never feel the need to minimize to a panel or tray ever again. It's an acquired taste, though. A tiling wm must feel like a second skin to you, or it'll just be a pain in the long run. Some of my most efficient setups are extremely low contrast and bland, like this one; ![]() P.S: Could you guys please start using thumbnails. That being said, command line is imperative for network related stuff. The only networking tool I use with a nice GUI is wireshark. Everything else (tcpdump, nc, etc) all use command line. |
|
|
Aug 11 2011, 06:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,748 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
QUOTE(farkinid @ Aug 11 2011, 05:34 PM) Actually, I use ALOT of command line but still use gedit for editing. I like the background colour when editing. Its easy on the eyes. I'm curious. How does one do manual diff comparisons on GEdit?? (I mean side-by side, not using a diff checker) I've tried it before, but Gedit seems to prefer a tabbing type of mode.This post has been edited by G-17: Aug 11 2011, 06:13 PM |
|
|
Aug 11 2011, 06:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
997 posts Joined: Feb 2007 |
QUOTE(G-17 @ Aug 11 2011, 06:12 PM) I'm curious. How does one do manual diff comparisons on GEdit?? (I mean side-by side, not using a diff checker) I've tried it before, but Gedit seems to prefer a tabbing type of mode. I don't usually need to compare multiple documents. Usually its just to examine results and figure out what the data means. And there is ALOT of lines to go thru. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 13 2011, 09:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,748 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
Aug 15 2011, 02:15 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,789 posts Joined: Jul 2010 From: Silicon Valley |
I'm in love
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Aug 15 2011, 03:28 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,748 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
^Your font smoothing/aliasing needs work.
Search for the infinality patch in the Arch Unmaintained Repository (AUR), and maybe a patched libcairo2 package as well. Dunno if KDE overrides fonts.conf or not, though. |
|
|
Aug 15 2011, 07:02 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
560 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: On my portable dude |
QUOTE(cocooh @ Aug 15 2011, 01:15 AM) Welcome to the evil world of the heavyweight desktop. Like G-17 said, you need some work on your font anti-aliasing. This looks no better than what I had in Windows, and I still have no idea on how to solve that (on Windows). This post has been edited by FlameReaper: Aug 15 2011, 07:03 AM |
|
|
Aug 15 2011, 08:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,789 posts Joined: Jul 2010 From: Silicon Valley |
Ahh , ok
|
|
|
Aug 15 2011, 10:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,224 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
|
|
|
Aug 16 2011, 05:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
560 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: On my portable dude |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 17 2011, 12:22 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
560 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: On my portable dude |
|
|
|
Aug 18 2011, 01:21 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,789 posts Joined: Jul 2010 From: Silicon Valley |
KDE again
Alone in the dark ![]() |
|
|
Aug 18 2011, 06:39 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
560 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: On my portable dude |
^ Dude, can't you just use thumbnails??
... Also, by the way, seems you're using Chakra. Added on August 19, 2011, 1:10 amFiddling around with my newly-acquired N900. ![]() This post has been edited by FlameReaper: Aug 19 2011, 01:10 AM |
|
|
Aug 19 2011, 06:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
|
|
|
Aug 19 2011, 08:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
560 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: On my portable dude |
|
|
|
Aug 21 2011, 07:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,789 posts Joined: Jul 2010 From: Silicon Valley |
Sexiness
![]() |
|
|
Aug 21 2011, 07:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,748 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
QUOTE(Patent @ Aug 19 2011, 06:27 PM) Now that's sexy!!I've been considering a fullscreen conky layout for my EvilWM setup, but since I prefer small pixel/bitmap fonts (Terminus, MonteCarlo, Artwiz...etc), I have to think of a LOT of variables for them to cover the whole screen, which is where I'm stuck right now. Don't really want to waste resources on LUA/Cairo animations and stuff. >_< |
| Change to: | 0.0296sec
0.90
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 06:59 PM |